Literature DB >> 21847885

The money blind: how to stop industry bias in biomedical science, without violating the First Amendment.

Christopher T Robertson1.   

Abstract

The pharmaceutical and medical device industries use billions of dollars to support the biomedical science that physicians, regulators, and patients use to make healthcare decisions--the decisions that drive an increasingly large portion of the American economy. Compelling evidence suggests that this industry money buys favorable results, biasing the outcomes of scientific research. Current efforts to manage the problem, including disclosure mandates and peer reviews, are ineffective. A blinding mechanism, operating through an intermediary such as the National Institutes of Health, could instead be developed to allow industry support of science without allowing undue influence. If the editors of biomedical journals fail to mandate that industry funders utilize such a solution, the federal government has several regulatory levers available, including conditioning federal funding and direct regulation, both of which could be done without violating the First Amendment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21847885     DOI: 10.1177/009885881103700207

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Law Med        ISSN: 0098-8588


  2 in total

1.  A randomized study of how physicians interpret research funding disclosures.

Authors:  Aaron S Kesselheim; Christopher T Robertson; Jessica A Myers; Susannah L Rose; Victoria Gillet; Kathryn M Ross; Robert J Glynn; Steven Joffe; Jerry Avorn
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-09-20       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Incomplete medication adherence of chronically ill patients in German primary care.

Authors:  Jakob Hüther; Alessa von Wolff; Dorit Stange; Martin Härter; Michael Baehr; Dorothee C Dartsch; Levente Kriston
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2013-03-22       Impact factor: 2.711

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.