AIM: To evaluate the impact of pathological review by pathologist with genitourinary expertise (PGU) on treatment modality of localized prostate cancer, we analyzed Gleason grade (GG) migration and the final treatment decision in a cohort of patients designated for permanent prostate brachytherapy (PPB). METHODS: From February 2005 to July 2010, a total of 247 patients with localized prostate cancer diagnosed by local community hospitals were referred to our hospital for PPB monotheray. All pathologic slides of prostate biopsies were reviewed by a single PGU. Patients ultimately selected their treatment modality from our recommendations based on the review. Indication for PPB monotherapy was the NCCN classification of patients as good or intermediate risk. In addition, patient with Primary GG 4 was regarded as unadapted case. RESULTS: Six cases were reinterpreted as no cancer (2.4%). GG change occurred in 94 cases (38.1%) of which 77 (81.9%) were upgraded and 17 (18.1%) downgraded. Of the total 247 patients, 86 (34.8%) changed therapies and 30 (12.1%) did so based on the pathologic slide review. CONCLUSIONS: Pathological review of biopsy specimens is mandatory for the determination of treatment modality especially in candidates for monotherapy of permanent prostate brachytherapy.
AIM: To evaluate the impact of pathological review by pathologist with genitourinary expertise (PGU) on treatment modality of localized prostate cancer, we analyzed Gleason grade (GG) migration and the final treatment decision in a cohort of patients designated for permanent prostate brachytherapy (PPB). METHODS: From February 2005 to July 2010, a total of 247 patients with localized prostate cancer diagnosed by local community hospitals were referred to our hospital for PPB monotheray. All pathologic slides of prostate biopsies were reviewed by a single PGU. Patients ultimately selected their treatment modality from our recommendations based on the review. Indication for PPB monotherapy was the NCCN classification of patients as good or intermediate risk. In addition, patient with Primary GG 4 was regarded as unadapted case. RESULTS: Six cases were reinterpreted as no cancer (2.4%). GG change occurred in 94 cases (38.1%) of which 77 (81.9%) were upgraded and 17 (18.1%) downgraded. Of the total 247 patients, 86 (34.8%) changed therapies and 30 (12.1%) did so based on the pathologic slide review. CONCLUSIONS: Pathological review of biopsy specimens is mandatory for the determination of treatment modality especially in candidates for monotherapy of permanent prostate brachytherapy.
Authors: Carys W Thomas; Terry C Bainbridge; Thomas A Thomson; Colleen E McGahan; W James Morris Journal: Brachytherapy Date: 2007 Apr-Jun Impact factor: 2.362
Authors: Michael J Burdick; Chandana A Reddy; James Ulchaker; Kenneth Angermeier; Andrew Altman; Nabil Chehade; Arul Mahadevan; Patrick A Kupelian; Eric A Klein; Jay P Ciezki Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2008-10-28 Impact factor: 7.038