Literature DB >> 21847603

Diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasonography in patients with inconclusive magnetic resonance imaging diagnosis of biliopancreatic abnormalities.

Rasoul Sotoudehmanesh1, Morteza Khatibian, Mohammad-Reza Ghadir, Mohammad Bagheri, Amir Pejman Hashemi-Taheri, Nahid Sedighi, Ali Ali-Asgari, Fatemeh Zeinali, Shadi Shahraeeni, Shadi Kolahdoozan.   

Abstract

AIM: To determine the sensitivity and specificity of endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) in patients with inconclusive magnetic resonance imaging/magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRI/MRCP) in pancreatobiliary abnormalities.
METHODS: During 10 months, patients with pancreatobiliary diseases referred to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) because of inconclusive MRI/MRCP diagnosis were scheduled to undergo endoscopic ultrasonography. Patients were divided into four major groups: patients with (i) resectable periampullary neoplasms who were referred to a surgeon, (ii) unresectable periampullary cancer who underwent ERCP for biliary stenting, (iii) bile duct stone who were referred to ERCP for stone extraction, and (iv) normal pancreatobiliary tract. Reference standards for comparison were ERCP, surgery, a biopsy confirming malignancy, or the clinical course during follow up (at least 12 months) in cases without evidences of malignancy.
RESULTS: One hundred and seven patients (51 men; mean [SD] age 60.0 [15.5]) were included in the study. Final diagnoses were common bile duct (CBD) stone (n = 24), periampullary neoplasms (n = 46), others (n = 23) and no pathologic findings (n = 14). EUS determined the staging for clinical decision-making in 47 patients with neoplasms which showed that tumors in 34 patients (79.1%) were unresectable (advanced stage). After EUS, 47 patients (43.9%) did not require ERCP. The accuracy of EUS for the diagnosis of CBD stone and periampullary neoplasms were 96.3% and 99.1%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: EUS is a useful modality in cases of inconclusive MRI/MRCP indicating pancreatobiliary disorders.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21847603     DOI: 10.1007/s12664-011-0120-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0254-8860


  34 in total

1.  Radial scanning and linear array endosonography for staging pancreatic cancer: a prospective randomized comparison.

Authors:  F Gress; T Savides; O Cummings; S Sherman; G Lehman; S Zaidi; R Hawes
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 9.427

2.  Value of sonography in obstructive jaundice. Limitations of bile duct caliber as an index of obstruction.

Authors:  O M Pedersen; K Nordgård; S Kvinnsland
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 2.423

3.  Role of endoscopic ultrasonography in prevention of unnecessary endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a prospective study of 150 patients.

Authors:  Rasoul Sotoudehmanesh; Shadi Kolahdoozan; Ali Ali Asgari; Masoud Dooghaei-Moghaddam; Sanaz Ainechi
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 2.153

4.  Correlation between spiral computed tomography, endoscopic ultrasonography and findings at operation in pancreatic and ampullary tumours.

Authors:  M J Midwinter; C J Beveridge; J B Wilsdon; M K Bennett; C J Baudouin; R M Charnley
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  Magnetic resonance-cholangiopancreatography in the diagnosis of biliopancreatic diseases.

Authors:  D Lomanto; P Pavone; A Laghi; V Panebianco; P Mazzocchi; F Fiocca; E Lezoche; R Passariello; V Speranza
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 2.565

6.  Choledocholithiasis and bile duct stenosis: diagnostic accuracy of MR cholangiopancreatography.

Authors:  C D Becker; M Grossholz; M Becker; G Mentha; R de Peyer; F Terrier
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  The use of endoscopic ultrasonography to reduce the cost of treating ampullary tumors.

Authors:  D M Quirk; D W Rattner; C Fernandez-del Castillo; A L Warshaw; W R Brugge
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 9.427

8.  Half-Fourier RARE MR cholangiopancreatography: experience in 300 subjects.

Authors:  A S Fulcher; M A Turner; G W Capps; A M Zfass; K M Baker
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  A comparison of ultrasound, computed tomography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant jaundice and cholestasis.

Authors:  P A Pasanen; K P Partanen; P H Pikkarainen; E M Alhava; E K Janatuinen; A E Pirinen
Journal:  Eur J Surg       Date:  1993-01

10.  Prospective comparison of endoscopic ultrasonography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the detection of bile duct stones.

Authors:  S A Norton; D Alderson
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 6.939

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: consensus conference-based guidelines.

Authors:  Ferdinando Agresta; Fabio Cesare Campanile; Nereo Vettoretto; Gianfranco Silecchia; Carlo Bergamini; Pietro Maida; Pietro Lombari; Piero Narilli; Domenico Marchi; Alessandro Carrara; Maria Grazia Esposito; Stefania Fiume; Giuseppe Miranda; Simona Barlera; Marina Davoli
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 3.445

2.  Sensitivity and Specificity of Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography versus Endoscopic Ultrasonography against Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography in Diagnosing Choledocholithiasis: The Indonesian Experience.

Authors:  Dadang Makmun; Achmad Fauzi; Hamzah Shatri
Journal:  Clin Endosc       Date:  2017-02-28
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.