Literature DB >> 21847033

Current problems and future opportunities of abdominal magnetic resonance imaging at higher field strengths.

Fabian Springer1, Petros Martirosian, Andreas Boss, Claus D Claussen, Fritz Schick.   

Abstract

Introduction of high-field-strength whole-body MR scanners to clinical routine made abdominal magnetic resonance (MR) imaging widely available. Higher field strength provides improved signal yield, but other issues such as shorter wavelength and increased power deposition of radiofrequency in tissue must also be taken into account. This review describes current problems and future opportunities of abdominal MR imaging at 3.0 T under special consideration of relevant physical properties and technical challenges: impact of higher field strength on signal-to-noise ratio, Larmor frequency, and chemical shift effects are elucidated in detail. Furthermore, changes in longitudinal and transverse relaxation times as well as increased susceptibility effects at 3.0 T are reported. General safety issues and limitations in radiofrequency power deposition are discussed. Subsequently, implications of the previously mentioned changed MR properties at 3.0 T on clinical abdominal examinations applying different sequence types are described.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21847033     DOI: 10.1097/RMR.0b013e3181e8f9b9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Top Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 0899-3459


  3 in total

1.  Diagnostic relevance of high field MRI in clinical neuroradiology: the advantages and challenges of driving a sports car.

Authors:  Mike P Wattjes; Frederik Barkhof
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-07-21       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  IVIM Diffusion-weighted Imaging of the Liver at 3.0T: Comparison with 1.5T.

Authors:  Yong Cui; Hadrien Dyvorne; Cecilia Besa; Nancy Cooper; Bachir Taouli
Journal:  Eur J Radiol Open       Date:  2015

3.  Reproducibility of intravoxel incoherent motion of liver on a 3.0T scanner: free-breathing and respiratory-triggered sequences acquired with different numbers of excitations.

Authors:  Andrzej Cieszanowski; Katarzyna Pasicz; Joanna Podgórska; Ewa Fabiszewska; Witold Skrzyński; Jakub Jasieniak; Agnieszka Anysz-Grodzicka; Iwona Grabska; Jakub Pałucki; Martyna Naduk-Ostrowska; Beata Jagielska; Paweł Kukołowicz
Journal:  Pol J Radiol       Date:  2018-09-17
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.