Literature DB >> 21846654

A review of the scientific basis for radiation protection of the patient.

B M Moores1, D Regulla.   

Abstract

The use of ionising radiation in medicine is the single largest man-made source of population exposure. Individual and collective doses to patients arising from the medical use of ionising radiations continue to rise significantly year on year. This is due to the increasing use of medical imaging procedures in modern healthcare systems as well as the continued development of new high dose techniques. This paper reviews the scientific basis for the principles of radiation protection as defined by the International Commission on Radiological Protection. These principles attempt to include exposures arising from both medical and non-medical applications within a common framework and have evolved over many years and changing socio-economic considerations. In particular, the concepts of justification and ALARA (doses should be as low as reasonably achievable), which underpin the principles for medical exposures are assessed in terms of their applicability to the scientific process and relevance to a rapidly changing technologically-led healthcare system. Radiation protection is an integral component of patient safety in medical practices and needs to be evidence based and amenable to the scientific process. The limitations imposed by the existing philosophy of radiation protection to the development of a quantitative framework for adequately assessing the performance of medical imaging systems are highlighted. In particular, medical practitioners will require quantitative guidance as to the risk-benefits arising from modern X-ray imaging methods if they are to make rational judgements as to the applicability of modern high-dose techniques to particular diagnostic and therapeutic tasks. At present such guidance is variable due to the lack of a rational framework for assessing the clinical impact of medical imaging techniques. The possible integration of radiation protection concepts into fundamental bio-medical imaging research activities is discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21846654     DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncr262

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry        ISSN: 0144-8420            Impact factor:   0.972


  7 in total

1.  Whole body imaging in the diagnosis of blunt trauma, ionizing radiation hazards and residual risk.

Authors:  J P Kepros; R C Opreanu; R Samaraweera; A Briningstool; C A Morrison; B D Mosher; P Schneider; P Stevens
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2012-07-12       Impact factor: 3.693

2.  Ground truth data generation for skull-face overlay.

Authors:  O Ibáñez; F Cavalli; B R Campomanes-Álvarez; C Campomanes-Álvarez; A Valsecchi; M I Huete
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 2.686

3.  Duty to Inform and Informed Consent in Diagnostic Radiology: How Ethics and Law can Better Guide Practice.

Authors:  Victoria Doudenkova; Jean-Christophe Bélisle Pipon
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2016-03

4.  Development of a computer simulation technique for low-dose chest radiographs: a phantom study.

Authors:  Rie Murakami; Shigehiko Katsuragawa
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2020-02-05

Review 5.  [Aspects of radiation protection during chest X-radiography].

Authors:  M C Seidenbusch; K Schneider
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 0.635

6.  Protective Effects of Hong Shan Capsule against Lethal Total-Body Irradiation-Induced Damage in Wistar Rats.

Authors:  Jianzhong Li; Jing Xu; Weiheng Xu; Yang Qi; Yiming Lu; Lei Qiu; Zhenlin Hu; Zhiyong Chu; Yifeng Chai; Junping Zhang
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 5.923

7.  COST-RISK-BENEFIT ANALYSIS IN DIAGNOSTIC RADIOLOGY: A THEORETICAL AND ECONOMIC BASIS FOR RADIATION PROTECTION OF THE PATIENT.

Authors:  B Michael Moores
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2015-12-24       Impact factor: 0.972

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.