Literature DB >> 21846541

Bacterial and Candida albicans adhesion on different root canal filling materials and sealers.

Christian Senges1, Karl-Thomas Wrbas, Markus Altenburger, Marie Follo, Bettina Spitzmüller, Annette Wittmer, Elmar Hellwig, Ali Al-Ahmad.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Microbial adhesion and subsequent biofilm formation on endodontic root canal filling materials and sealers lead to survival of microorganisms in treated root canals and subsequently to endodontic treatment failures. The present study focused on initial microbial adhesion to different endodontic filling materials.
METHODS: The following endodontic biomaterials were tested: AH-Plus, Tubli Seal, gutta-percha, Real Seal SE, EndoREZ, Apexit Plus, GuttaFlow, and dentin. Samples of each material were prepared. Bovine dentin samples were used as a control. The initial adhesions of salivary bacteria as well as the subsequent single species were quantified by determination of colony-forming units (CFUs) and visualized by scanning electron microscopy and confocal microscopy (CLSM): Enterococcus faecalis, Streptococcus mutans, Streptococcus sanguis, Candida albicans, and Prevotella nigrescens.
RESULTS: Initially adherent microorganisms could be detected and microscopically visualized on each of the materials tested. Considering the values of the CFUs and the covering grade as detected by CLSM, there were significant differences among the materials. Fewer bacteria tended to adhere to Apexit Plus, whereas Real Seal SE and the widely used gutta-percha showed the highest number of adherent bacteria. This tendency was not detected for C. albicans.
CONCLUSIONS: Endodontic microorganisms have a high affinity to root canal filling materials and sealers, especially to gutta-percha. Because of this high level of bacterial adhesion, subsequent biofilm formation on these materials could be suggested as leading to the persistence of microorganisms in root canals.
Copyright © 2011 American Association of Endodontists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21846541     DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2011.05.034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endod        ISSN: 0099-2399            Impact factor:   4.171


  5 in total

1.  Supplementary sampling of obturation materials enhances microbial analysis of endodontic treatment failures: a proof of principle study.

Authors:  L Karygianni; A C Anderson; C Tennert; K Kollmar; M J Altenburger; E Hellwig; A Al-Ahmad
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2014-03-28       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Rapid kill-novel endodontic sealer and Enterococcus faecalis.

Authors:  Nurit Beyth; Dana Kesler Shvero; Nathan Zaltsman; Yael Houri-Haddad; Itzhak Abramovitz; Michael Perez Davidi; Ervin I Weiss
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Repair of a strip perforation with calcium-enriched mixture cement: a case report.

Authors:  Mohammad Jafar Eghbal; Mahta Fazlyab; Saeed Asgary
Journal:  Iran Endod J       Date:  2014-07-05

4.  Evaluation physical characteristics and comparison antimicrobial and anti-inflammation potentials of dental root canal sealers containing hinokitiol in vitro.

Authors:  Yin-Hua Shih; Dan-Jae Lin; Kuo-Wei Chang; Shih-Min Hsia; Shun-Yao Ko; Shyh-Yuan Lee; Shui-Sang Hsue; Tong-Hong Wang; Yi-Ling Chen; Tzong-Ming Shieh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-10       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  An in vitro study on the effects of serum proteins on Enterococcus faecalis adhesion to three types of root sealers and gutta-percha.

Authors:  Xinwei Lin; Danlu Chi; Qimei Gong; Zhongchun Tong
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2021-12-07       Impact factor: 2.757

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.