BACKGROUND: Despite increased cardiometabolic risk in individuals with mental illness taking antipsychotic medication, metabolic screening practices are often incomplete or inconsistent. METHOD: We undertook a systematic search and a PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses) meta-analysis of studies examining routine metabolic screening practices in those taking antipsychotics both for patients in psychiatric care before and following implementation of monitoring guidelines. RESULTS: We identified 48 studies (n=290 534) conducted between 2000 and 2011 in five countries; 25 studies examined predominantly schizophrenia-spectrum disorder populations; 39 studies (n=218 940) examined routine monitoring prior to explicit guidelines; and nine studies (n=71 594) reported post-guideline monitoring. Across 39 studies, routine baseline screening was generally low and above 50% only for blood pressure [69.8%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 50.9-85.8] and triglycerides (59.9%, 95% CI 36.6-81.1). Cholesterol was measured in 41.5% (95% CI 18.0-67.3), glucose in 44.3% (95% CI 36.3-52.4) and weight in 47.9% (95% CI 32.4-63.7). Lipids and glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c) were monitored in less than 25%. Rates were similar for schizophrenia patients, in US and UK studies, for in-patients and out-patients. Monitoring was non-significantly higher in case-record versus database studies and in fasting samples. Following local/national guideline implementation, monitoring improved for weight (75.9%, CI 37.3-98.7), blood pressure (75.2%, 95% CI 45.6-95.5), glucose (56.1%, 95% CI 43.4-68.3) and lipids (28.9%, 95% CI 20.3-38.4). Direct head-to-head pre-post-guideline comparison showed a modest but significant (15.4%) increase in glucose testing (p=0.0045). CONCLUSIONS: In routine clinical practice, metabolic monitoring is concerningly low in people prescribed antipsychotic medication. Although guidelines can increase monitoring, most patients still do not receive adequate testing.
BACKGROUND: Despite increased cardiometabolic risk in individuals with mental illness taking antipsychotic medication, metabolic screening practices are often incomplete or inconsistent. METHOD: We undertook a systematic search and a PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses) meta-analysis of studies examining routine metabolic screening practices in those taking antipsychotics both for patients in psychiatric care before and following implementation of monitoring guidelines. RESULTS: We identified 48 studies (n=290 534) conducted between 2000 and 2011 in five countries; 25 studies examined predominantly schizophrenia-spectrum disorder populations; 39 studies (n=218 940) examined routine monitoring prior to explicit guidelines; and nine studies (n=71 594) reported post-guideline monitoring. Across 39 studies, routine baseline screening was generally low and above 50% only for blood pressure [69.8%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 50.9-85.8] and triglycerides (59.9%, 95% CI 36.6-81.1). Cholesterol was measured in 41.5% (95% CI 18.0-67.3), glucose in 44.3% (95% CI 36.3-52.4) and weight in 47.9% (95% CI 32.4-63.7). Lipids and glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c) were monitored in less than 25%. Rates were similar for schizophreniapatients, in US and UK studies, for in-patients and out-patients. Monitoring was non-significantly higher in case-record versus database studies and in fasting samples. Following local/national guideline implementation, monitoring improved for weight (75.9%, CI 37.3-98.7), blood pressure (75.2%, 95% CI 45.6-95.5), glucose (56.1%, 95% CI 43.4-68.3) and lipids (28.9%, 95% CI 20.3-38.4). Direct head-to-head pre-post-guideline comparison showed a modest but significant (15.4%) increase in glucose testing (p=0.0045). CONCLUSIONS: In routine clinical practice, metabolic monitoring is concerningly low in people prescribed antipsychotic medication. Although guidelines can increase monitoring, most patients still do not receive adequate testing.
Authors: Marc De Hert; Johan Detraux; Ruud van Winkel; Weiping Yu; Christoph U Correll Journal: Nat Rev Endocrinol Date: 2011-10-18 Impact factor: 43.330
Authors: Robert O Cotes; Alex de Nesnera; Michael Kelly; Karen Orsini; Haiyi Xie; Greg McHugo; Stephen Bartels; Mary F Brunette Journal: Community Ment Health J Date: 2015-02-03
Authors: Davy Vancampfort; Joseph Firth; Christoph U Correll; Marco Solmi; Dan Siskind; Marc De Hert; Rebekah Carney; Ai Koyanagi; André F Carvalho; Fiona Gaughran; Brendon Stubbs Journal: World Psychiatry Date: 2019-02 Impact factor: 49.548
Authors: W Wolfgang Fleischhacker; Celso Arango; Paul Arteel; Thomas R E Barnes; William Carpenter; Ken Duckworth; Silvana Galderisi; Lisa Halpern; Martin Knapp; Stephen R Marder; Mary Moller; Norman Sartorius; Peter Woodruff Journal: Schizophr Bull Date: 2014-04 Impact factor: 9.306
Authors: Kristen M Ward; Larisa Yeoman; Cora McHugh; A Zarina Kraal; Stephanie A Flowers; Amy E Rothberg; Alla Karnovsky; Arun K Das; Vicki L Ellingrod; Kathleen A Stringer Journal: Pharmacotherapy Date: 2018-06 Impact factor: 4.705
Authors: Davy Vancampfort; Martien Wampers; Alex J Mitchell; Christoph U Correll; Amber De Herdt; Michel Probst; Marc De Hert Journal: World Psychiatry Date: 2013-10 Impact factor: 49.548