BACKGROUND: Hypertension frequently coexists with diabetes mellitus, resulting in increased cardiovascular risk. Thus, BP control is crucial in decreasing morbidity and mortality in this difficult-to-treat patient population. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of aliskiren in hypertensive patients with diabetes not adequately responsive to the combination ofvalsartan and hydrochlorothiazide (HCT). METHODS: After a 1- to 4-week washout period, patients with a mean sitting diastolic BP (msDBP) ≥95 mmHg were treated with valsartan 160 mg for 2 weeks followed by valsartan/HCT 160 mg/25 mg for an additional 4 weeks (single-blind active run-in period). Patients whose msDBP remained ≥85 mmHg after the active run-in period were randomized (1 : 1) to receive aliskiren 150 mg (n = 184) or placebo (n = 179) as add-on therapy for 6 weeks. Aliskiren was then force-titrated to 300 mg once daily for another 6 weeks. Efficacy variables were: the change in msDBP and mean sitting systolic BP (msSBP) from baseline to week 12 endpoint, diastolic response (msDBP <80 mmHg or reduction of at least 10 mmHg), and BP control rate (<130/80 mmHg). RESULTS: Of the 363 patients randomized, 328 (90.4%) completed the study (aliskiren and placebo groups: 89.7% and 91.1%, respectively). At week 12 endpoint, the least squares mean (LSM) changes in msDBP (aliskiren vs placebo: -5.8 vs -4.8 mmHg; p = 0.2767) and msSBP (aliskiren vs placebo: -7.3 vs -4.8 mmHg; p = 0.0725) were numerically greater in patients treated with aliskiren compared with those treated with placebo; however, this difference was not statistically significant. The proportion of diastolic responders (aliskiren and placebo: 68.5% and 72.9%, respectively; p = 0.8482) and patients achieving BP control (aliskiren and placebo: 16.0% and 16.4%, respectively; p = 0.7511) were similar for both groups. Overall, 63 (34%) and 59 (33%) patients in the aliskiren and placebo groups, respectively, experienced adverse events (AEs). The most commonly reported AEs were headache (placebo group: 6.1%) and dizziness (aliskiren group: 4.4%). Aliskiren was well tolerated. CONCLUSION: The reductions in BP with aliskiren added to valsartan/HCT in this study were numerically greater compared with placebo added to valsartan/HCT, although not statistically significant.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND:Hypertension frequently coexists with diabetes mellitus, resulting in increased cardiovascular risk. Thus, BP control is crucial in decreasing morbidity and mortality in this difficult-to-treat patient population. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of aliskiren in hypertensivepatients with diabetes not adequately responsive to the combination of valsartan and hydrochlorothiazide (HCT). METHODS: After a 1- to 4-week washout period, patients with a mean sitting diastolic BP (msDBP) ≥95 mmHg were treated with valsartan 160 mg for 2 weeks followed by valsartan/HCT 160 mg/25 mg for an additional 4 weeks (single-blind active run-in period). Patients whose msDBP remained ≥85 mmHg after the active run-in period were randomized (1 : 1) to receive aliskiren 150 mg (n = 184) or placebo (n = 179) as add-on therapy for 6 weeks. Aliskiren was then force-titrated to 300 mg once daily for another 6 weeks. Efficacy variables were: the change in msDBP and mean sitting systolic BP (msSBP) from baseline to week 12 endpoint, diastolic response (msDBP <80 mmHg or reduction of at least 10 mmHg), and BP control rate (<130/80 mmHg). RESULTS: Of the 363 patients randomized, 328 (90.4%) completed the study (aliskiren and placebo groups: 89.7% and 91.1%, respectively). At week 12 endpoint, the least squares mean (LSM) changes in msDBP (aliskiren vs placebo: -5.8 vs -4.8 mmHg; p = 0.2767) and msSBP (aliskiren vs placebo: -7.3 vs -4.8 mmHg; p = 0.0725) were numerically greater in patients treated with aliskiren compared with those treated with placebo; however, this difference was not statistically significant. The proportion of diastolic responders (aliskiren and placebo: 68.5% and 72.9%, respectively; p = 0.8482) and patients achieving BP control (aliskiren and placebo: 16.0% and 16.4%, respectively; p = 0.7511) were similar for both groups. Overall, 63 (34%) and 59 (33%) patients in the aliskiren and placebo groups, respectively, experienced adverse events (AEs). The most commonly reported AEs were headache (placebo group: 6.1%) and dizziness (aliskiren group: 4.4%). Aliskiren was well tolerated. CONCLUSION: The reductions in BP with aliskiren added to valsartan/HCT in this study were numerically greater compared with placebo added to valsartan/HCT, although not statistically significant.
Authors: Julia Vogel; Philip Boehme; Susanne Homann; Mario Boehm; Katharina Andrea Schütt; Katharina Boden; Jakob Balitzki; Jörg Hüser; Wilfried Dinh; Hubert Truebel; Peter Sandner; Thomas Mondritzki Journal: Hypertens Res Date: 2021-09-22 Impact factor: 3.872