PURPOSE: To evaluate the validity of commonly used anatomical designations for the four hyperreflective outer retinal bands seen in current-generation optical coherence tomography, a scale model of outer retinal morphology was created using published information for direct comparison with optical coherence tomography scans. METHODS: Articles and books concerning histology of the outer retina from 1900 until 2009 were evaluated, and data were used to create a scale model drawing. Boundaries between outer retinal tissue compartments described by the model were compared with intensity variations of representative spectral-domain optical coherence tomography scans using longitudinal reflectance profiles to determine the region of origin of the hyperreflective outer retinal bands. RESULTS: This analysis showed a high likelihood that the spectral-domain optical coherence tomography bands attributed to the external limiting membrane (the first, innermost band) and to the retinal pigment epithelium (the fourth, outermost band) are correctly attributed. Comparative analysis showed that the second band, often attributed to the boundary between inner and outer segments of the photoreceptors, actually aligns with the ellipsoid portion of the inner segments. The third band corresponded to an ensheathment of the cone outer segments by apical processes of the retinal pigment epithelium in a structure known as the contact cylinder. CONCLUSION: Anatomical attributions and subsequent pathophysiologic assessments pertaining to the second and third outer retinal hyperreflective bands may not be correct. This analysis has identified testable hypotheses for the actual correlates of the second and third bands. Nonretinal pigment epithelium contributions to the fourth band (e.g., Bruch membrane) remain to be determined.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the validity of commonly used anatomical designations for the four hyperreflective outer retinal bands seen in current-generation optical coherence tomography, a scale model of outer retinal morphology was created using published information for direct comparison with optical coherence tomography scans. METHODS: Articles and books concerning histology of the outer retina from 1900 until 2009 were evaluated, and data were used to create a scale model drawing. Boundaries between outer retinal tissue compartments described by the model were compared with intensity variations of representative spectral-domain optical coherence tomography scans using longitudinal reflectance profiles to determine the region of origin of the hyperreflective outer retinal bands. RESULTS: This analysis showed a high likelihood that the spectral-domain optical coherence tomography bands attributed to the external limiting membrane (the first, innermost band) and to the retinal pigment epithelium (the fourth, outermost band) are correctly attributed. Comparative analysis showed that the second band, often attributed to the boundary between inner and outer segments of the photoreceptors, actually aligns with the ellipsoid portion of the inner segments. The third band corresponded to an ensheathment of the cone outer segments by apical processes of the retinal pigment epithelium in a structure known as the contact cylinder. CONCLUSION: Anatomical attributions and subsequent pathophysiologic assessments pertaining to the second and third outer retinal hyperreflective bands may not be correct. This analysis has identified testable hypotheses for the actual correlates of the second and third bands. Nonretinal pigment epithelium contributions to the fourth band (e.g., Bruch membrane) remain to be determined.
Authors: Robert J Zawadzki; Stacey S Choi; Steven M Jones; Scot S Oliver; John S Werner Journal: J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis Date: 2007-05 Impact factor: 2.129
Authors: Christian Ahlers; Erich Götzinger; Michael Pircher; Isabelle Golbaz; Franz Prager; Christopher Schütze; Bernhard Baumann; Christoph K Hitzenberger; Ursula Schmidt-Erfurth Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2009-09-24 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Barry Cense; Weihua Gao; Jeffrey M Brown; Steven M Jones; Ravi S Jonnal; Mircea Mujat; B Hyle Park; Johannes F de Boer; Donald T Miller Journal: Opt Express Date: 2009-11-23 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: C A Toth; D G Narayan; S A Boppart; M R Hee; J G Fujimoto; R Birngruber; C P Cain; C D DiCarlo; W P Roach Journal: Arch Ophthalmol Date: 1997-11
Authors: Donald C Hood; Xian Zhang; Rithambara Ramachandran; Christine L Talamini; Ali Raza; Jonathan P Greenberg; Jerome Sherman; Stephen H Tsang; David G Birch Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2011-12-28 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: José Maria Ruiz-Moreno; Francisco Lugo; Javier A Montero; David P Piñero Journal: Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol Date: 2012-02-23 Impact factor: 3.117
Authors: Samuel G Jacobson; Artur V Cideciyan; Igor V Peshenko; Alexander Sumaroka; Elena V Olshevskaya; Lihui Cao; Sharon B Schwartz; Alejandro J Roman; Melani B Olivares; Sam Sadigh; King-Wai Yau; Elise Heon; Edwin M Stone; Alexander M Dizhoor Journal: Hum Mol Genet Date: 2012-10-03 Impact factor: 6.150