PURPOSE: Copy number variants have emerged as a major cause of human disease such as autism and intellectual disabilities. Because copy number variants are common in normal individuals, determining the functional and clinical significance of rare copy number variants in patients remains challenging. The adoption of whole-genome chromosomal microarray analysis as a first-tier diagnostic test for individuals with unexplained developmental disabilities provides a unique opportunity to obtain large copy number variant datasets generated through routine patient care. METHODS: A consortium of diagnostic laboratories was established (the International Standards for Cytogenomic Arrays consortium) to share copy number variant and phenotypic data in a central, public database. We present the largest copy number variant case-control study to date comprising 15,749 International Standards for Cytogenomic Arrays cases and 10,118 published controls, focusing our initial analysis on recurrent deletions and duplications involving 14 copy number variant regions. RESULTS: Compared with controls, 14 deletions and seven duplications were significantly overrepresented in cases, providing a clinical diagnosis as pathogenic. CONCLUSION: Given the rapid expansion of clinical chromosomal microarray analysis testing, very large datasets will be available to determine the functional significance of increasingly rare copy number variants. This data will provide an evidence-based guide to clinicians across many disciplines involved in the diagnosis, management, and care of these patients and their families.
PURPOSE: Copy number variants have emerged as a major cause of human disease such as autism and intellectual disabilities. Because copy number variants are common in normal individuals, determining the functional and clinical significance of rare copy number variants in patients remains challenging. The adoption of whole-genome chromosomal microarray analysis as a first-tier diagnostic test for individuals with unexplained developmental disabilities provides a unique opportunity to obtain large copy number variant datasets generated through routine patient care. METHODS: A consortium of diagnostic laboratories was established (the International Standards for Cytogenomic Arrays consortium) to share copy number variant and phenotypic data in a central, public database. We present the largest copy number variant case-control study to date comprising 15,749 International Standards for Cytogenomic Arrays cases and 10,118 published controls, focusing our initial analysis on recurrent deletions and duplications involving 14 copy number variant regions. RESULTS: Compared with controls, 14 deletions and seven duplications were significantly overrepresented in cases, providing a clinical diagnosis as pathogenic. CONCLUSION: Given the rapid expansion of clinical chromosomal microarray analysis testing, very large datasets will be available to determine the functional significance of increasingly rare copy number variants. This data will provide an evidence-based guide to clinicians across many disciplines involved in the diagnosis, management, and care of these patients and their families.
Authors: Christian R Marshall; Abdul Noor; John B Vincent; Anath C Lionel; Lars Feuk; Jennifer Skaug; Mary Shago; Rainald Moessner; Dalila Pinto; Yan Ren; Bhooma Thiruvahindrapduram; Andreas Fiebig; Stefan Schreiber; Jan Friedman; Cees E J Ketelaars; Yvonne J Vos; Can Ficicioglu; Susan Kirkpatrick; Rob Nicolson; Leon Sloman; Anne Summers; Clare A Gibbons; Ahmad Teebi; David Chitayat; Rosanna Weksberg; Ann Thompson; Cathy Vardy; Vicki Crosbie; Sandra Luscombe; Rebecca Baatjes; Lonnie Zwaigenbaum; Wendy Roberts; Bridget Fernandez; Peter Szatmari; Stephen W Scherer Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 2008-01-17 Impact factor: 11.025
Authors: A C Smith; L McGavran; J Robinson; G Waldstein; J Macfarlane; J Zonona; J Reiss; M Lahr; L Allen; E Magenis Journal: Am J Med Genet Date: 1986-07
Authors: E H Cook; V Lindgren; B L Leventhal; R Courchesne; A Lincoln; C Shulman; C Lord; E Courchesne Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 1997-04 Impact factor: 11.025
Authors: E Rajcan-Separovic; C Harvard; X Liu; B McGillivray; J G Hall; Y Qiao; J Hurlburt; J Hildebrand; E C R Mickelson; J J A Holden; M E S Lewis Journal: J Med Genet Date: 2006-09-08 Impact factor: 6.318
Authors: David T Miller; Margaret P Adam; Swaroop Aradhya; Leslie G Biesecker; Arthur R Brothman; Nigel P Carter; Deanna M Church; John A Crolla; Evan E Eichler; Charles J Epstein; W Andrew Faucett; Lars Feuk; Jan M Friedman; Ada Hamosh; Laird Jackson; Erin B Kaminsky; Klaas Kok; Ian D Krantz; Robert M Kuhn; Charles Lee; James M Ostell; Carla Rosenberg; Stephen W Scherer; Nancy B Spinner; Dimitri J Stavropoulos; James H Tepperberg; Erik C Thorland; Joris R Vermeesch; Darrel J Waggoner; Michael S Watson; Christa Lese Martin; David H Ledbetter Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 2010-05-14 Impact factor: 11.025
Authors: Marjolein H Willemsen; Bridget A Fernandez; Carlos A Bacino; Erica Gerkes; Arjan P M de Brouwer; Rolph Pfundt; Birgit Sikkema-Raddatz; Stephen W Scherer; Christian R Marshall; Lorraine Potocki; Hans van Bokhoven; Tjitske Kleefstra Journal: Eur J Hum Genet Date: 2009-11-18 Impact factor: 4.246
Authors: Heather C Mefford; Severine Clauin; Andrew J Sharp; Rikke S Moller; Reinhard Ullmann; Raj Kapur; Dan Pinkel; Gregory M Cooper; Mario Ventura; H Hilger Ropers; Niels Tommerup; Evan E Eichler; Christine Bellanne-Chantelot Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 2007-09-26 Impact factor: 11.025
Authors: F D Hannes; A J Sharp; H C Mefford; T de Ravel; C A Ruivenkamp; M H Breuning; J-P Fryns; K Devriendt; G Van Buggenhout; A Vogels; H Stewart; R C Hennekam; G M Cooper; R Regan; S J L Knight; E E Eichler; J R Vermeesch Journal: J Med Genet Date: 2008-06-11 Impact factor: 6.318
Authors: Jill A Rosenfeld; Ryan N Traylor; G Bradley Schaefer; Elizabeth W McPherson; Blake C Ballif; Eva Klopocki; Stefan Mundlos; Lisa G Shaffer; Arthur S Aylsworth Journal: Eur J Hum Genet Date: 2012-02-08 Impact factor: 4.246
Authors: Erwin Brosens; Florian Marsch; Elisabeth M de Jong; Hitisha P Zaveri; Alina C Hilger; Vera Gisela Choinitzki; Alice Hölscher; Per Hoffmann; Stefan Herms; Thomas M Boemers; Benno M Ure; Martin Lacher; Michael Ludwig; Bert H Eussen; Robert M van der Helm; Hannie Douben; Diane Van Opstal; Rene M H Wijnen; H Berna Beverloo; Yolande van Bever; Alice S Brooks; Hanneke IJsselstijn; Daryl A Scott; Johannes Schumacher; Dick Tibboel; Heiko Reutter; Annelies de Klein Journal: Eur J Hum Genet Date: 2016-07-20 Impact factor: 4.246
Authors: Abigail S Carey; Li Liang; Jonathan Edwards; Tracy Brandt; Hui Mei; Andrew J Sharp; Daphne T Hsu; Jane W Newburger; Richard G Ohye; Wendy K Chung; Mark W Russell; Jill A Rosenfeld; Lisa G Shaffer; Michael K Parides; Lisa Edelmann; Bruce D Gelb Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Genet Date: 2013-09-10
Authors: Malgorzata I Srebniak; Karin E M Diderich; Lutgarde C P Govaerts; Marieke Joosten; Sam Riedijk; Robert Jan H Galjaard; Diane Van Opstal Journal: Eur J Hum Genet Date: 2013-11-06 Impact factor: 4.246
Authors: Virpi M Leppa; Stephanie N Kravitz; Christa Lese Martin; Joris Andrieux; Cedric Le Caignec; Dominique Martin-Coignard; Christina DyBuncio; Stephan J Sanders; Jennifer K Lowe; Rita M Cantor; Daniel H Geschwind Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 2016-08-25 Impact factor: 11.025
Authors: Nicole de Leeuw; Trijnie Dijkhuizen; Jayne Y Hehir-Kwa; Nigel P Carter; Lars Feuk; Helen V Firth; Robert M Kuhn; David H Ledbetter; Christa Lese Martin; Conny M A van Ravenswaaij-Arts; Steven W Scherer; Soheil Shams; Steven Van Vooren; Rolf Sijmons; Morris Swertz; Ros Hastings Journal: Hum Mutat Date: 2012-06 Impact factor: 4.878