Literature DB >> 21844608

Differences in geriatric anthropometric data between DXA-based subject-specific estimates and non-age-specific traditional regression models.

April J Chambers1, Alison L Sukits, Jean L McCrory, Rakie Cham.   

Abstract

Age, obesity, and gender can have a significant impact on the anthropometrics of adults aged 65 and older. The aim of this study was to investigate differences in body segment parameters derived using two methods: (1) a dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) subject-specific method (Chambers et al., 2010) and (2) traditional regression models (de Leva, 1996). The impact of aging, gender, and obesity on the potential differences between these methods was examined. Eighty-three healthy older adults were recruited for participation. Participants underwent a whole-body DXA scan (Hologic QDR 1000/W). Mass, length, center of mass, and radius of gyration were determined for each segment. In addition, traditional regressions were used to estimate these parameters (de Leva, 1996). A mixed linear regression model was performed (α = 0.05). Method type was significant in every variable of interest except forearm segment mass. The obesity and gender differences that we observed translate into differences associated with using traditional regressions to predict anthropometric variables in an aging population. Our data point to a need to consider age, obesity, and gender when utilizing anthropometric data sets and to develop regression models that accurately predict body segment parameters in the geriatric population, considering gender and obesity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21844608      PMCID: PMC4886334          DOI: 10.1123/jab.27.3.197

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Biomech        ISSN: 1065-8483            Impact factor:   1.833


  31 in total

1.  Sensitivity of the results produced by the inverse dynamic analysis of a human stride to perturbed input data.

Authors:  Miguel P T Silva; Jorge A C Ambrósio
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.840

2.  Influence of body segments' parameters estimation models on inverse dynamics solutions during gait.

Authors:  Guillaume Rao; David Amarantini; Eric Berton; Daniel Favier
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2005-06-20       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Obesity and workers' compensation: results from the Duke Health and Safety Surveillance System.

Authors:  Truls Ostbye; John M Dement; Katrina M Krause
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2007-04-23

4.  Changes in segmental inertial properties with age.

Authors:  Jennifer Muri; Samantha L Winter; John H Challis
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  Weight, shape, and mortality risk in older persons: elevated waist-hip ratio, not high body mass index, is associated with a greater risk of death.

Authors:  Gill M Price; Ricardo Uauy; Elizabeth Breeze; Christopher J Bulpitt; Astrid E Fletcher
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 7.045

6.  Prevalence of overweight and obesity in the United States, 1999-2004.

Authors:  Cynthia L Ogden; Margaret D Carroll; Lester R Curtin; Margaret A McDowell; Carolyn J Tabak; Katherine M Flegal
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-04-05       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Distribution of mass to the segments of elderly males and females.

Authors:  R K Jensen; P Fletcher
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  Anthropometric assessment of 10-y changes in body composition in the elderly.

Authors:  Virginia A Hughes; Ronenn Roubenoff; Michael Wood; Walter R Frontera; William J Evans; Maria A Fiatarone Singh
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 7.045

9.  Pelvic body composition measurements by quantitative computed tomography: association with recent hip fracture.

Authors:  T Lang; A Koyama; C Li; J Li; Y Lu; I Saeed; E Gazze; J Keyak; T Harris; X Cheng
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2008-01-30       Impact factor: 4.398

10.  Changes in body segment inertial parameters of obese individuals with weight loss.

Authors:  Sara L Matrangola; Michael L Madigan; Maury A Nussbaum; Robert Ross; Kevin P Davy
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2008-10-17       Impact factor: 2.712

View more
  2 in total

1.  Segmental Musculoskeletal Examinations using Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry (DXA): Positioning and Analysis Considerations.

Authors:  Nicolas H Hart; Sophia Nimphius; Tania Spiteri; Jodie L Cochrane; Robert U Newton
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2015-08-11       Impact factor: 2.988

2.  Impact of the seated height to stature ratio on torso segment parameters.

Authors:  Zachary Merrill; Charles Woolley; Rakié Cham
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2020-07-20       Impact factor: 2.778

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.