Literature DB >> 21844438

Effect of physician and hospital experience on patient outcomes for endovascular treatment of aortoiliac occlusive disease.

Jeffrey E Indes1, Charles T Tuggle, Anant Mandawat, Bart E Muhs, Julie A Sosa.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of physician volume and specialty and hospital volume on population-level outcomes after endovascular repair of aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD).
DESIGN: A retrospective cross-sectional analysis of all inpatients undergoing endovascular repair of AIOD. Physician volume was classified as low (<17 procedures per year [<50th percentile]) or high (≥17 procedures per year). Physicians were defined as surgeons if they performed at least 1 carotid, aortic, or iliac endarterectomy; open aortic repair; above- or below-knee amputation; or aortoiliac-femoral bypass. Hospital volume was low (<116 procedures per year [<50th percentile]) or high (≥116 procedures per year). PATIENTS: Eight hundred eighteen inpatients who underwent endovascular repair of AIOD in the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Nationwide Inpatient Sample from January 2003 through December 2007.
SETTING: National hospital database. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: In-hospital complications and mortality, length of stay, and cost.
RESULTS: Of the 818 procedures, 59.0% of high-volume physicians were surgeons and 65.0% practiced at high-volume hospitals. Unadjusted complication rates were significantly higher for low-volume compared with high-volume physicians (18.7% vs 12.6%; P = .02); rates were not significantly different by physician specialty (P = .88) or hospital volume (P = .16). Shorter length of stay was associated with high-volume physicians (P = .001), high-volume hospitals (P = .001), and surgeon providers (P = .03), whereas decreased cost was associated with physician specialty (P = .004). On multivariate analysis, high physician volume was associated with significantly lower complications (P = .04); high hospital volume, with shorter length of stay (P = .002); and nonsurgeons, with higher costs (P = .05).
CONCLUSIONS: Overall, volume at the physician and hospital levels appears to be a robust predictor of patient outcomes after endovascular interventions for AIOD. Surgeons performing endovascular procedures for AIOD have a decreased associated hospital cost compared with nonsurgeons.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21844438     DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.2011.187

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Surg        ISSN: 0004-0010


  3 in total

1.  Outcomes of endovascular lower extremity interventions depend more on indication than physician specialty.

Authors:  Justin R Wallace; Theodore Yuo; Luke Marone; Rabih A Chaer; Michel S Makaroun
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2013-10-03       Impact factor: 4.268

2.  Improving operating efficiency with emphasis on prosthetic surgery.

Authors:  Neil Baum; David F Mobley; Paul Perito
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2015 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.285

3.  Impact of Hospital Volume on Clinical Outcomes after Aortoiliac Stenting in Patients with Peripheral Artery Disease.

Authors:  Osamu Iida; Mitsuyoshi Takahara; Yasutaka Yamauchi; Yoshiaki Shintani; Teruyasu Sugano; Yoshito Yamamoto; Daizo Kawasaki; Hiroyoshi Yokoi; Akira Miyamoto; Toshiaki Mano; Masato Nakamura
Journal:  J Atheroscler Thromb       Date:  2019-10-05       Impact factor: 4.928

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.