Literature DB >> 21844381

Creating compact comparative health care information: what are the key quality attributes to present for cataract and total hip or knee replacement surgery?

Olga C Damman1,2, Peter Spreeuwenberg1, Jany Rademakers1, Michelle Hendriks1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The recent emphasis on providing comparative health care data to the public has resulted in a large amount of online information. To focus on the most essential attributes, insight is needed into which attributes are actually considered by consumers.
OBJECTIVE: To assess which attributes of Dutch hospital performance information contribute most to consumers' hospital choice for cataract and total hip or knee replacement surgery.
DESIGN: Two discrete-choice experiments were performed: one for cataract surgery and one for total hip or knee replacement surgery. Participants viewed hypothetical hospitals based on representative values for 10 attributes (e.g., distance to the hospital, waiting time for the surgery, conduct of professionals, information provision, complication rate) and were asked to select the hospital they would choose if they needed treatment. We used multilevel logistic regression analysis to test the effects of the attributes and the interactions between attributes and respondent characteristics on consumers' hospital choice.
RESULTS: All except one attribute (length of the first appointment with the ophthalmologist) contributed significantly to consumers' choices. Although some differences were found between cataract and hip/knee replacement surgery, the most influential attributes for both types of surgeries were distance, waiting time, and the attributes of patient safety (complication rate of capsular rupture and the use of procedures to prevent adverse effects of thrombosis). Interaction effects were found between hospital attributes, on one hand, and age, education, and consumer choice orientation, on the other hand.
CONCLUSIONS: As for cataract and total hip/knee replacement surgery, the attributes that seem most important to consumers when choosing a hospital are access (waiting time and distance) and patient safety attributes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21844381     DOI: 10.1177/0272989X11415115

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Decis Making        ISSN: 0272-989X            Impact factor:   2.583


  13 in total

1.  Facts and Fears in Public Reporting: Patients' Information Needs and Priorities When Selecting a Hospital for Cancer Care.

Authors:  Susan Chimonas; Elizabeth Fortier; Diane G Li; Allison Lipitz-Snyderman
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2019-06-21       Impact factor: 2.583

Review 2.  Risk as an attribute in discrete choice experiments: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Mark Harrison; Dan Rigby; Caroline Vass; Terry Flynn; Jordan Louviere; Katherine Payne
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.883

Review 3.  A Systematic Review of the Factors that Patients Use to Choose their Surgeon.

Authors:  Alexander T Yahanda; Kelly J Lafaro; Gaya Spolverato; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Patients' expectations of variation in quality of care relates to their search for comparative performance information.

Authors:  Nicole A B M Ketelaar; Marjan J Faber; Jozé C Braspenning; Gert P Westert
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 2.655

5.  Patients' Need for Tailored Comparative Health Care Information: A Qualitative Study on Choosing a Hospital.

Authors:  Nicolien C Zwijnenberg; Michelle Hendriks; Evelien Bloemendal; Olga C Damman; Judith D de Jong; Diana Mj Delnoij; Jany Jd Rademakers
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 5.428

6.  Characterizing Patient Preferences Surrounding Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  John M Reuter; Carolyn A Hutyra; Cary S Politzer; Christopher C Calixte; Daniel J Scott; David E Attarian; Richard C Mather
Journal:  JB JS Open Access       Date:  2018-10-23

Review 7.  Determinants of patient choice of healthcare providers: a scoping review.

Authors:  Aafke Victoor; Diana M J Delnoij; Roland D Friele; Jany J D J M Rademakers
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-08-22       Impact factor: 2.908

8.  Are patients' preferences regarding the place of treatment heard and addressed at the point of referral: an exploratory study based on observations of GP-patient consultations.

Authors:  Aafke Victoor; Janneke Noordman; Johan A Sonderkamp; Diana M J Delnoij; Roland D Friele; Sandra van Dulmen; Jany J D J M Rademakers
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2013-12-10       Impact factor: 2.497

9.  Multilevel Modeling and Policy Development: Guidelines and Applications to Medical Travel.

Authors:  Eduardo Garcia-Garzon; Peter Zhukovsky; Elisa Haller; Sara Plakolm; David Fink; Dafina Petrova; Vaishali Mahalingam; Igor G Menezes; Kai Ruggeri
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-05-24

10.  Perspective of potential patients on the hospital volume-outcome relationship and the minimum volume threshold for total knee arthroplasty: a qualitative focus group and interview study.

Authors:  Charlotte M Kugler; Karina K De Santis; Tanja Rombey; Kaethe Goossen; Jessica Breuing; Nadja Könsgen; Tim Mathes; Simone Hess; René Burchard; Dawid Pieper
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.