BACKGROUND: Since 2007 interhospital transport of intensive care patients in Lower Saxony appertains to the performance requirements of emergency medical services. Against this background the Working Group for Evaluation of Intensive Care Transport (Arbeitsgemeinschaft Evaluation Intensivverlegung) was established. This group formulated standardized definitions for the requirements of intensive care transport vehicles and a federal statewide monitoring of intensive care transport was implemented to analyze if simultaneously on-call intensive care transport systems (intensive care helicopter and ground based mobile intensive care units) can be deployed need-based and efficiently. METHODS: A prospective follow-up study and evaluation of intensive care transport in Lower Saxony between April 1(st) 2008 and July 31(st) 2010 was carried out. RESULTS: A total of 6,779 data records were evaluated in this study of which 4,941 (72.9%) missions were located in Lower Saxony, 2,928 (43.2%) missions were carried out by helicopters and 3,851 (56.8%) by ground based mobile intensive care units. The mean duration of a mission was 3 h 59min±2 h 25 min, 4 h 39 min±2 h 23 min by ground based mobile intensive care units and 2 h 21 in±30 min by helicopter units. All systems proved to be feasible for intensive care transport. The degree of urgency was estimated correctly in 94.8% of the evaluated missions and 58.0% of the transfers could not be deployed. In 76.8% patients were transferred to hospitals with a higher level of medical care, 51.7% of patients were transferred for intensive care therapy and 40.4% for an operation/intervention. Of the patients 38.2% required mechanical ventilation and in 48.3% invasive monitoring was carried out. CONCLUSION: Interhospital transfer of intensive care patients can be carried out need-based with a limited number of intensive care transport vehicles if the missions are deployed effectively by standardized disposition in accordance with performance requirements.
BACKGROUND: Since 2007 interhospital transport of intensive care patients in Lower Saxony appertains to the performance requirements of emergency medical services. Against this background the Working Group for Evaluation of Intensive Care Transport (Arbeitsgemeinschaft Evaluation Intensivverlegung) was established. This group formulated standardized definitions for the requirements of intensive care transport vehicles and a federal statewide monitoring of intensive care transport was implemented to analyze if simultaneously on-call intensive care transport systems (intensive care helicopter and ground based mobile intensive care units) can be deployed need-based and efficiently. METHODS: A prospective follow-up study and evaluation of intensive care transport in Lower Saxony between April 1(st) 2008 and July 31(st) 2010 was carried out. RESULTS: A total of 6,779 data records were evaluated in this study of which 4,941 (72.9%) missions were located in Lower Saxony, 2,928 (43.2%) missions were carried out by helicopters and 3,851 (56.8%) by ground based mobile intensive care units. The mean duration of a mission was 3 h 59min±2 h 25 min, 4 h 39 min±2 h 23 min by ground based mobile intensive care units and 2 h 21 in±30 min by helicopter units. All systems proved to be feasible for intensive care transport. The degree of urgency was estimated correctly in 94.8% of the evaluated missions and 58.0% of the transfers could not be deployed. In 76.8% patients were transferred to hospitals with a higher level of medical care, 51.7% of patients were transferred for intensive care therapy and 40.4% for an operation/intervention. Of the patients 38.2% required mechanical ventilation and in 48.3% invasive monitoring was carried out. CONCLUSION: Interhospital transfer of intensive care patients can be carried out need-based with a limited number of intensive care transport vehicles if the missions are deployed effectively by standardized disposition in accordance with performance requirements.
Authors: H Schröder; A-K Brockert; S K Beckers; A Follmann; A Sommer; F Kork; R Rossaint; M Felzen Journal: Anaesthesist Date: 2020-07-15 Impact factor: 1.041