Literature DB >> 21841505

Soluble mesothelin, megakaryocyte potentiating factor, and osteopontin as markers of patient response and outcome in mesothelioma.

Kevin Hollevoet1, Kristiaan Nackaerts, Robert Gosselin, Walter De Wever, Lionel Bosquée, Paul De Vuyst, Paul Germonpré, Eliane Kellen, Catherine Legrand, Yoshiro Kishi, Joris R Delanghe, Jan P van Meerbeeck.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Soluble mesothelin (SM), megakaryocyte potentiating factor (MPF), and osteopontin (OPN) are blood biomarkers of mesothelioma. This study evaluates their use as markers of response to therapy and outcome.
METHODS: Sixty-two patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma were included in an observational multicenter study. Blood samples and matched computed tomography scans were collected at diagnosis and, when possible, during and after therapy. For each patient, the best overall radiological response was compared with the changes in serum SM, MPF, and plasma OPN levels across corresponding time points.
RESULTS: In five patients, blood sampling was done shortly before and after extrapleural pneumonectomy. SM and MPF levels markedly decreased after surgery, whereas OPN levels showed a median increase. Fifty-seven patients were surveilled during (and after) chemotherapy, of whom 27 (47%) had stable disease, 14 (25%) partial response, and 16 (28%) progressive disease. In patients with stable disease, SM and MPF levels did not change significantly across the corresponding time points, whereas OPN levels significantly decreased. In those with partial response, SM and MPF levels significantly decreased, whereas OPN levels showed no significant change. In patients with progressive disease, all three biomarker levels significantly increased. Patient responses correlated with a 15% change in all three biomarkers, although SM and MPF appeared more accurate than OPN. Low baseline OPN levels were independently associated with favorable progression-free survival and overall survival. Neither SM nor MPF showed prognostic value.
CONCLUSIONS: SM and MPF levels were more closely associated with disease course than OPN and might prove useful in monitoring patient response in mesothelioma. Baseline OPN levels were an independent negative predictor of survival. These promising results require further validation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21841505     DOI: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e3182272294

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Oncol        ISSN: 1556-0864            Impact factor:   15.609


  29 in total

1.  Serum mesothelin and megakaryocyte potentiating factor in pancreatic and biliary cancers.

Authors:  Elad Sharon; Jingli Zhang; Kevin Hollevoet; Seth M Steinberg; Ira Pastan; Masanori Onda; Jochen Gaedcke; B Michael Ghadimi; Thomas Ried; Raffit Hassan
Journal:  Clin Chem Lab Med       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 3.694

2.  Mesothelin, Calretinin, and Megakaryocyte Potentiating Factor as Biomarkers of Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma.

Authors:  Carmina Jiménez-Ramírez; Swaantje Casjens; Cuauhtémoc Arturo Juárez-Pérez; Irina Raiko; Luz M Del Razo; Dirk Taeger; Emma S Calderón-Aranda; Hans-Peter Rihs; Leonor Concepción Acosta-Saavedra; Daniel Gilbert Weber; Alejandro Cabello-López; Beate Pesch; María Dolores Ochoa-Vázquez; Katarzyna Burek; Luis Torre-Bouscoulet; José Rogelio Pérez-Padilla; Erik Marco García-Bazan; Thomas Brüning; Georg Johnen; Guadalupe Aguilar-Madrid
Journal:  Lung       Date:  2019-07-02       Impact factor: 2.584

3.  The continual search for ideal biomarkers for mesothelioma: the hurdles.

Authors:  Fraser J Brims; Y C Gary Lee; Jenette Creaney
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.895

4.  Radical surgery for malignant pleural mesothelioma: have we identified the appropriate selection tools?

Authors:  Nico van Zandwijk; Glen Reid; Anthony Linton; Steven Kao
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2012-11

Review 5.  Role of osteopontin in the pathophysiology of cancer.

Authors:  Lalita A Shevde; Rajeev S Samant
Journal:  Matrix Biol       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 11.583

6.  Plasma Biomarker Enrichment of Clinical Prognostic Indices in Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma.

Authors:  Harvey I Pass; Chandra Goparaju; Osvaldo Espin-Garcia; Jessica Donington; Michele Carbone; Devalben Patel; Zhuo Chen; Ronald Feld; John Cho; Shirish Gadgeel; Antoinette Wozniak; Abraham Chachoua; Natasha Leighl; Ming-Sound Tsao; Marc de Perrot; Wei Xu; Geoffrey Liu
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2016-02-21       Impact factor: 15.609

Review 7.  Diagnosis and prognosis-review of biomarkers for mesothelioma.

Authors:  Huan H Sun; Allen Vaynblat; Harvey I Pass
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2017-06

Review 8.  Serum mesothelin and other biomarkers: what have we learned in the last decade?

Authors:  Alfonso Cristaudo; Alessandra Bonotti; Giovanni Guglielmi; Poupak Fallahi; Rudy Foddis
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 9.  Prognostic value of several biomarkers for the patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma.

Authors:  Hui Liu; Licun Wu; Kai Ji; Wei Wang
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2015-09-11

Review 10.  Malignant pleural mesothelioma: current and future perspectives.

Authors:  Konstantinos Porpodis; Paul Zarogoulidis; Efimia Boutsikou; Antonis Papaioannou; Nikolaos Machairiotis; Kosmas Tsakiridis; Nikolaos Katsikogiannis; Bojan Zaric; Branislav Perin; Haidong Huang; Ioanna Kougioumtzi; Dionysios Spyratos; Konstantinos Zarogoulidis
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.895

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.