Daniel Gaston1, Edward Susko, Andrew J Roger. 1. Centre for Comparative Genomics and Evolutionary Bioinformatics, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada, B3H 1X5.
Abstract
MOTIVATION: To understand the evolution of molecular function within protein families, it is important to identify those amino acid residues responsible for functional divergence; i.e. those sites in a protein family that affect cofactor, protein or substrate binding preferences; affinity; catalysis; flexibility; or folding. Type I functional divergence (FD) results from changes in conservation (evolutionary rate) at a site between protein subfamilies, whereas type II FD occurs when there has been a shift in preferences for different amino acid chemical properties. A variety of methods have been developed for identifying both site types in protein subfamilies, both from phylogenetic and information-theoretic angles. However, evaluation of the performance of these methods has typically relied upon a handful of reasonably well-characterized biological datasets or analyses of a single biological example. While experimental validation of many truly functionally divergent sites (true positives) can be relatively straightforward, determining that particular sites do not contribute to functional divergence (i.e. false positives and true negatives) is much more difficult, resulting in noisy 'gold standard' examples. RESULTS: We describe a novel, phylogeny-based functional divergence classifier, FunDi. Unlike previous approaches, FunDi uses a unified mixture model-based approach to detect type I and type II FD. To assess FunDi's overall classification performance relative to other methods, we introduce two methods for simulating functionally divergent datasets. We find that the FunDi method performs better than several other predictors over a wide variety of simulation conditions. AVAILABILITY: http://rogerlab.biochem.dal.ca/Software CONTACT: andrew.roger@dal.ca SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
MOTIVATION: To understand the evolution of molecular function within protein families, it is important to identify those amino acid residues responsible for functional divergence; i.e. those sites in a protein family that affect cofactor, protein or substrate binding preferences; affinity; catalysis; flexibility; or folding. Type I functional divergence (FD) results from changes in conservation (evolutionary rate) at a site between protein subfamilies, whereas type II FD occurs when there has been a shift in preferences for different amino acid chemical properties. A variety of methods have been developed for identifying both site types in protein subfamilies, both from phylogenetic and information-theoretic angles. However, evaluation of the performance of these methods has typically relied upon a handful of reasonably well-characterized biological datasets or analyses of a single biological example. While experimental validation of many truly functionally divergent sites (true positives) can be relatively straightforward, determining that particular sites do not contribute to functional divergence (i.e. false positives and true negatives) is much more difficult, resulting in noisy 'gold standard' examples. RESULTS: We describe a novel, phylogeny-based functional divergence classifier, FunDi. Unlike previous approaches, FunDi uses a unified mixture model-based approach to detect type I and type II FD. To assess FunDi's overall classification performance relative to other methods, we introduce two methods for simulating functionally divergent datasets. We find that the FunDi method performs better than several other predictors over a wide variety of simulation conditions. AVAILABILITY: http://rogerlab.biochem.dal.ca/Software CONTACT: andrew.roger@dal.ca SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Authors: Sergio A Muñoz-Gómez; Edward Susko; Kelsey Williamson; Laura Eme; Claudio H Slamovits; David Moreira; Purificación López-García; Andrew J Roger Journal: Nat Ecol Evol Date: 2022-01-13 Impact factor: 19.100
Authors: Matthew W Brown; Susan C Sharpe; Jeffrey D Silberman; Aaron A Heiss; B Franz Lang; Alastair G B Simpson; Andrew J Roger Journal: Proc Biol Sci Date: 2013-08-28 Impact factor: 5.349