Literature DB >> 21840680

International values of corneal elevation in normal subjects by rotating Scheimpflug camera.

Matthew T Feng1, Michael W Belin, Renato Ambrósio, Satinder P S Grewal, Wang Yan, Mohamed Shafik Shaheen, Charlotte A Jordon, Charles McGhee, Naoyuki Maeda, Tobias H Neuhann, H Burkhard Dick, Andreas Steinmueller.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To examine whether clinically significant differences exist in corneal elevation data from a sampling of countries worldwide.
SETTING: International multicenter.
DESIGN: Evaluation of diagnostic test or technology.
METHODS: One randomly selected eye of normal adults from 8 countries spanning 6 continents was examined using the Pentacam Eye Scanner. Anterior and posterior elevations were measured at the apex and thinnest point. Differences between countries were assessed by Kruskal-Wallis. Normative thresholds were defined according to the Tukey method.
RESULTS: The study examined 1 eye of 555 patients. Median elevations were similar across countries. Upper limits of normal for collective international data were 3.5 μm, 6.0 μm, 7.5 μm, and 13.5 μm at the anterior apex, anterior thinnest point, posterior apex, and posterior thinnest point, respectively. These and country-specific thresholds were similar to normal values from previous data; however, country-specific thresholds flagged additional eyes in China, Egypt, and India. Those thresholds were 4.5 μm at the anterior thinnest point (China and Egypt), 7.4 μm at the posterior apex (India), and 11.0 μm and 12.0 μm at the posterior thinnest point (China and Egypt, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: In general, international variations were clinically insignificant; thus, current screening guidelines maintained their applicability. Notable exceptions were China, Egypt, and India, where country-specific thresholds may better reflect the test populations and minimize potential false negative results from screening. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned. Additional disclosures are found in the footnotes. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21840680     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2011.04.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg        ISSN: 0886-3350            Impact factor:   3.351


  5 in total

1.  Evaluation of corneal epithelial and stromal thickness in keratoconus using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Naoyuki Maeda; Tomoya Nakagawa; Ritsuko Higashiura; Mutsumi Fuchihata; Shizuka Koh; Kohji Nishida
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-07-12       Impact factor: 2.447

2.  Clear-cornea cataract surgery: pupil size and shape changes, along with anterior chamber volume and depth changes. A Scheimpflug imaging study.

Authors:  Anastasios John Kanellopoulos; George Asimellis
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-10-24

Review 3.  Pentacam® Corneal Tomography for Screening of Refractive Surgery Candidates: A Review of the Literature, Part I.

Authors:  Mahsaw N Motlagh; Majid Moshirfar; Michael S Murri; David F Skanchy; Hamed Momeni-Moghaddam; Yasmyne C Ronquillo; Phillip C Hoopes
Journal:  Med Hypothesis Discov Innov Ophthalmol       Date:  2019

4.  Corneal Scheimpflug topography values to distinguish between normal eyes, ocular allergy, and keratoconus in children.

Authors:  Matheus Ivan Schmitz Vieira; Alessandro Adad Jammal; Carlos Eduardo Leite Arieta; Monica Alves; Jose Paulo Cabral de Vasconcellos
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 5.  Assessing progression of keratoconus: novel tomographic determinants.

Authors:  Joshua K Duncan; Michael W Belin; Mark Borgstrom
Journal:  Eye Vis (Lond)       Date:  2016-03-11
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.