Literature DB >> 21840359

A systematic review of the evidence on the effectiveness and risks of inactivated influenza vaccines in different target groups.

Barbara Michiels1, Frans Govaerts, Roy Remmen, Etienne Vermeire, Samuel Coenen.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To systematically review the evidence regarding the efficacy, effectiveness and risks of the use of inactivated influenza vaccines in children, healthy adults, elderly individuals and individuals with co-morbidities such as diabetes, chronic lung disease, cardiovascular disease, kidney or liver disease and immune suppression.
METHODS: The Cochrane database of systematic reviews was searched for relevant reviews and supplemented with searches of the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials database and Medline. Two reviewers independently assessed review and trial quality and extracted data. RESULTS AND
CONCLUSIONS: The inactivated influenza vaccine has been proven effective in preventing laboratory-confirmed influenza among healthy adults (16-65 years) and children (≥6 years) (GRADE A evidence). However, there is strikingly limited good-quality evidence (all GRADE B, C or not existing) of the effectiveness of influenza vaccination on complications such as pneumonia, hospitalisation and influenza-specific and overall mortality. Inconsistent results are found in studies among children younger than 6 years, individuals with COPD, institutionalised elderly (65 years or older), elderly with co-morbidities and healthcare workers in elderly homes, which can only be explained by bias of unknown origin. The vaccination of pregnant women might be beneficial for their newborns, and vaccination of children might be protective in non-recipients of the vaccine of all ages living in the same community (one RCT, Grade B evidence). Copyright Â
© 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21840359     DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.08.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vaccine        ISSN: 0264-410X            Impact factor:   3.641


  61 in total

Review 1.  Vaccination of healthcare workers: A review.

Authors:  Skerdi Haviari; Thomas Bénet; Mitra Saadatian-Elahi; Philippe André; Pierre Loulergue; Philippe Vanhems
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Technical guidelines for the application of seasonal influenza vaccine in China (2014-2015).

Authors:  Luzhao Feng; Peng Yang; Tao Zhang; Juan Yang; Chuanxi Fu; Ying Qin; Yi Zhang; Chunna Ma; Zhaoqiu Liu; Quanyi Wang; Genming Zhao; Hongjie Yu
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  The antibody response to influenza vaccination is not impaired in type 2 diabetics.

Authors:  Patricia A Sheridan; Heather A Paich; Jean Handy; Erik A Karlsson; Stacey Schultz-Cherry; Michael Hudgens; Sam Weir; Terry Noah; Melinda A Beck
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 3.641

4.  Annual influenza vaccination.

Authors:  David A Kelly; David J Macey; Donna B Mak
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Ethnic disparities in influenza vaccination in Canada.

Authors:  Bradford D Gessner
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2012-09-10       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  Strategies to achieve the healthy people 2020 annual influenza vaccine coverage goal for health-care personnel: recommendations from the national vaccine advisory committee.

Authors: 
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2013 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.792

Review 7.  Vaccines in Multiple Sclerosis.

Authors:  Eric M L Williamson; Salim Chahin; Joseph R Berger
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 5.081

Review 8.  Vaccination in the elderly: what can be recommended?

Authors:  Pierre-Olivier Lang; Richard Aspinall
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 9.  The Unexpected Impact of Vaccines on Secondary Bacterial Infections Following Influenza.

Authors:  Amber M Smith; Victor C Huber
Journal:  Viral Immunol       Date:  2017-11-17       Impact factor: 2.257

10.  Induction of ICOS+CXCR3+CXCR5+ TH cells correlates with antibody responses to influenza vaccination.

Authors:  Salah-Eddine Bentebibel; Santiago Lopez; Gerlinde Obermoser; Nathalie Schmitt; Cynthia Mueller; Carson Harrod; Emilio Flano; Asuncion Mejias; Randy A Albrecht; Derek Blankenship; Hui Xu; Virginia Pascual; Jacques Banchereau; Adolfo Garcia-Sastre; Anna Karolina Palucka; Octavio Ramilo; Hideki Ueno
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 17.956

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.