AIMS: Women with remote histories of gestational diabetes mellitus can reduce their diabetes risk through lifestyle changes, but the effectiveness of interventions in women with more recent histories of gestational diabetes has not been reported. Therefore, we conducted a pilot study of a low-intensity web-based pedometer programme targeting glucose intolerance among women with recent gestational diabetes. METHODS:Women with a gestational diabetes delivery within the past 3 years were randomized to a 13-week intervention consisting of a structured web-based pedometer programme which gave personalized steps-per-week goals, pedometers and education regarding lifestyle modification, or to a letter about diabetes risk reduction and screening after delivery for gestational diabetes (control condition). The main outcome measures were change in fasting plasma glucose and 2-h glucose levels on a 75-g oral glucose tolerance test between baseline and 13-week follow-up. Weight was a secondary outcome and behavioural constructs (self-efficacy, social support, risk perception) were also assessed. RESULTS:Forty-nine women were enrolled. At 13-week follow-up, women randomized to the intervention did not have significant changes in behavioural constructs, physical activity or anthropometrics compared with women in the control group. Changes in fasting plasma glucose (-0.046 mmol/l vs. 0.038 mmol/l, P = 0.65), 2-h glucose values (-0.48 mmol/l vs. -0.42 mmol/l, P = 0.91) and weight (-0.14 kg vs. -1.5 kg, P = 0.13) were similar between the control and intervention groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Structured web-based education utilizing pedometers is feasible although uptake may be low. Such programmes may need to be supplemented with additional measures in order to be effective for reduction of diabetes risk.
RCT Entities:
AIMS: Women with remote histories of gestational diabetes mellitus can reduce their diabetes risk through lifestyle changes, but the effectiveness of interventions in women with more recent histories of gestational diabetes has not been reported. Therefore, we conducted a pilot study of a low-intensity web-based pedometer programme targeting glucose intolerance among women with recent gestational diabetes. METHODS:Women with a gestational diabetes delivery within the past 3 years were randomized to a 13-week intervention consisting of a structured web-based pedometer programme which gave personalized steps-per-week goals, pedometers and education regarding lifestyle modification, or to a letter about diabetes risk reduction and screening after delivery for gestational diabetes (control condition). The main outcome measures were change in fasting plasma glucose and 2-h glucose levels on a 75-g oral glucose tolerance test between baseline and 13-week follow-up. Weight was a secondary outcome and behavioural constructs (self-efficacy, social support, risk perception) were also assessed. RESULTS: Forty-nine women were enrolled. At 13-week follow-up, women randomized to the intervention did not have significant changes in behavioural constructs, physical activity or anthropometrics compared with women in the control group. Changes in fasting plasma glucose (-0.046 mmol/l vs. 0.038 mmol/l, P = 0.65), 2-h glucose values (-0.48 mmol/l vs. -0.42 mmol/l, P = 0.91) and weight (-0.14 kg vs. -1.5 kg, P = 0.13) were similar between the control and intervention groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Structured web-based education utilizing pedometers is feasible although uptake may be low. Such programmes may need to be supplemented with additional measures in order to be effective for reduction of diabetes risk.
Authors: Husna Razee; Hidde P van der Ploeg; Ilse Blignault; Ben J Smith; Adrian E Bauman; Mark McLean; N Wah Cheung Journal: Health Promot J Austr Date: 2010-08
Authors: Catherine Kim; Laura N McEwen; John D Piette; Jennifer Goewey; Assiamira Ferrara; Elizabeth A Walker Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2007-06-15 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Catherine Kim; Laura N McEwen; Edith C Kieffer; William H Herman; John D Piette Journal: Diabetes Educ Date: 2008 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 2.140
Authors: Dean J Wantland; Carmen J Portillo; William L Holzemer; Rob Slaughter; Eva M McGhee Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2004-11-10 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: David N Cavallo; Deborah F Tate; Dianne S Ward; Robert F DeVellis; Linden M Thayer; Alice S Ammerman Journal: Transl Behav Med Date: 2014-12 Impact factor: 3.046
Authors: Sarah M Brokaw; Dorota Carpenedo; Paul Campbell; Marcene K Butcher; Steven D Helgerson; Todd S Harwell Journal: Matern Child Health J Date: 2018-04
Authors: Nina Rautio; Jari Jokelainen; Eeva Korpi-Hyövälti; Heikki Oksa; Timo Saaristo; Markku Peltonen; Leena Moilanen; Mauno Vanhala; Matti Uusitupa; Jaakko Tuomilehto; Sirkka Keinänen-Kiukaanniemi Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2014-05-01 Impact factor: 2.681
Authors: David N Cavallo; Deborah F Tate; Amy V Ries; Jane D Brown; Robert F DeVellis; Alice S Ammerman Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2012-11 Impact factor: 5.043