Literature DB >> 2183868

Comparison of once daily atenolol, nitrendipine and their combination in mild to moderate essential hypertension.

D Maclean1, E T Mitchell, R Lewis, N Irvine, J S McLay, J McEwen, R R Coulson, N D Slater, T J Fitzsimons, D G McDevitt.   

Abstract

1. The aim of the study was to compare the efficacy and the tolerability of treatment with atenolol (50-100 mg once daily), nitrendipine (20-40 mg once daily) and their combination (atenolol 50 mg + nitrendipine 20 mg) once daily in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension. 2. The study was a randomised, double-blind, placebo controlled parallel groups design: blood pressures were measured at 'trough' effect (i.e. 24 h after dosing) to assess the adequacy of once-daily treatment. 3. Mean blood pressures (mm Hg) recorded on four occasions over 12 weeks of treatment were significantly lower both with atenolol (155/97 sitting: 155/104 standing) and with the combination of atenolol plus nitrendipine (153/96 sitting: 152/104 standing) than with placebo (169/108 sitting: 169/114 standing). Nitrendipine alone had no significant effect on blood pressure 24 h after dosing (165/104 sitting: 165/110 standing). 4. Withdrawals due to adverse effects were more common during treatment with nitrendipine: 7/32 of the patients experienced adverse effects attributable to intense systemic vasodilatation (e.g., flushing, erythema, headache). 2/37 patients taking atenolol were withdrawn: one because he developed a psoriatic rash and the other because of impaired peripheral circulation. Of the 35 patients taking combination treatment, two were withdrawn: one developed headaches and dyspnoea, and the other asthma. 5. The results suggest that once daily dosing with nitrendipine does not control blood pressure throughout the 24 h period in the majority of patients, and is associated with a considerable burden of adverse effects. Combination treatment was better tolerated but appeared to offer no advantages over atenolol alone in terms either of blood pressure control or adverse effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2183868      PMCID: PMC1380116          DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1990.tb03664.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0306-5251            Impact factor:   4.335


  20 in total

1.  Clinical experience with long-term nitrendipine treatment in essential hypertension.

Authors:  A Tourkantonis; A Lasaridis; L Settas
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Pharmacol       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 3.105

2.  Relationship between the antihypertensive effect and steady-state plasma concentration of nifedipine given alone or in combination with a beta-adrenoceptor blocking agent.

Authors:  O Lederballe Pedersen; C K Christensen; E Mikkelsen; K D Rämsch
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1980-10       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 3.  Adverse reactions to calcium antagonists.

Authors:  J G Lewis
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1983-02       Impact factor: 9.546

4.  [Elevation of serum creatine phosphokinase during pindolol treatment (author's transl)].

Authors:  K Imataka; A Seki; N Takahashi; J Fujii; Y Ohuchi; K Kuwako; T Umeda; K Machii; T Hasegawa; A Ozoe
Journal:  Nihon Naika Gakkai Zasshi       Date:  1981-04-10

5.  Use of calcium antagonists as monotherapy in the management of hypertension.

Authors:  F B Müller; P Bolli; P Erne; W Kiowski; F R Bühler
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1984-08-31       Impact factor: 4.965

6.  Efficacy and safety of nitrendipine in patients with severe hypertension: a multiclinic study.

Authors:  A K Jain; F G McMahon; J R Ryan; R Maronde; N Vlachakis; W Mroczek
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Pharmacol       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 3.105

7.  Efficacy of once daily nitrendipine in essential hypertension--a study using ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.

Authors:  J H Lazarus; M D Littley; D I Phillips
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 3.012

8.  Haemodynamic effects of nifedipine in essential hypertension at rest and during exercise.

Authors:  P Lund-Johansen; P Omvik
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  1983-08       Impact factor: 4.844

9.  Role of nifedipine in treatment of hypertension.

Authors:  M B Murphy; A J Scriven; C T Dollery
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1983-07-23

10.  A double-blind randomized cross-over study of the efficacy and tolerability of nifedipine and nitrendipine in the treatment of mild to moderate hypertension.

Authors:  A M Heagerty; J D Swales
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 4.335

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Atenolol. A reappraisal of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic use in cardiovascular disorders.

Authors:  A N Wadworth; D Murdoch; R N Brogden
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 9.546

2.  Efficacy and tolerability of a fixed-dose combination of metoprolol extended release/amlodipine in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension: a randomized, parallel-group, multicentre comparison with losartan plus amlodipine.

Authors:  Anil Pareek; Nitin B Chandurkar; Ravishankar Sharma; Dharmendra Tiwari; Bhagwan S Gupta
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.859

Review 3.  Blood pressure lowering efficacy of beta-1 selective beta blockers for primary hypertension.

Authors:  Gavin W K Wong; Heidi N Boyda; James M Wright
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-03-10
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.