Literature DB >> 21838549

Adaptive trial designs.

Tze Leung Lai1, Philip William Lavori, Mei-Chiung Shih.   

Abstract

We review adaptive designs for clinical trials, giving special attention to the control of the Type I error in late-phase confirmatory trials, when the trial planner wishes to adjust the final sample size of the study in response to an unblinded analysis of interim estimates of treatment effects. We point out that there is considerable inefficiency in using the adaptive designs that employ conditional power calculations to reestimate the sample size and that maintain the Type I error by using certain weighted test statistics. Although these adaptive designs have little advantage over familiar group-sequential designs, our review also describes recent developments in adaptive designs that are both flexible and efficient. We also discuss the use of Bayesian designs, when the context of use demands control over operating characteristics (Type I and II errors) and correction of the bias of estimated treatment effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21838549      PMCID: PMC4296970          DOI: 10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-010611-134504

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol        ISSN: 0362-1642            Impact factor:   13.820


  13 in total

1.  Type I error in sample size re-estimations based on observed treatment difference.

Authors:  Z Shun; W Yuan; W E Brady; H Hsu
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2001-02-28       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  A sample size adjustment procedure for clinical trials based on conditional power.

Authors:  Gang Li; Weichung J Shih; Tailiang Xie; Jiang Lu
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 5.899

3.  Efficient group sequential designs when there are several effect sizes under consideration.

Authors:  Christopher Jennison; Bruce W Turnbull
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2006-03-30       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 4.  A brief review on software developments for group sequential and adaptive designs.

Authors:  Gernot Wassmer; Marc Vandemeulebroecke
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.207

5.  Efficient adaptive designs with mid-course sample size adjustment in clinical trials.

Authors:  Jay Bartroff; Tze Leung Lai
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2008-05-10       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 6.  Optimizing trial design: sequential, adaptive, and enrichment strategies.

Authors:  Cyrus Mehta; Ping Gao; Deepak L Bhatt; Robert A Harrington; Simona Skerjanec; James H Ware
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2009-02-03       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 7.  Adaptive clinical trials: progress and challenges.

Authors:  Christopher S Coffey; John A Kairalla
Journal:  Drugs R D       Date:  2008

8.  Self-designing clinical trials.

Authors:  L D Fisher
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1998-07-30       Impact factor: 2.373

9.  The role of internal pilot studies in increasing the efficiency of clinical trials.

Authors:  J Wittes; E Brittain
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1990 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.373

10.  Internal pilot studies for estimating sample size.

Authors:  M A Birkett; S J Day
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1994 Dec 15-30       Impact factor: 2.373

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Cardiovascular drug discovery: a perspective from a research-based pharmaceutical company.

Authors:  G Gromo; J Mann; J D Fitzgerald
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2014-06-02       Impact factor: 6.915

2.  Perspective: Randomized Controlled Trials Are Not a Panacea for Diet-Related Research.

Authors:  James R Hébert; Edward A Frongillo; Swann A Adams; Gabrielle M Turner-McGrievy; Thomas G Hurley; Donald R Miller; Ira S Ockene
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2016-05-16       Impact factor: 8.701

3.  Adaptive designs for comparative effectiveness research trials.

Authors:  John A Kairalla; Christopher S Coffey; Mitchell A Thomann; Ronald I Shorr; Keith E Muller
Journal:  Clin Res Regul Aff       Date:  2014-11-13

Review 4.  Adding a treatment arm to an ongoing clinical trial: a review of methodology and practice.

Authors:  Dena R Cohen; Susan Todd; Walter M Gregory; Julia M Brown
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 2.279

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.