Literature DB >> 21837741

Events in procurement as risk factors for ischemic cholangiopathy in liver transplantation using donation after cardiac death donors.

C Burcin Taner1, Ilynn G Bulatao, Darrin L Willingham, Dana K Perry, Lena Sibulesky, Surakit Pungpapong, Jaime Aranda-Michel, Andrew P Keaveny, David J Kramer, Justin H Nguyen.   

Abstract

The use of donation after cardiac death (DCD) liver grafts is controversial because of the overall increased rates of graft loss and morbidity, which are mostly related to the consequences of ischemic cholangiopathy (IC). In this study, we sought to determine the factors leading to graft loss and the development of IC and to compare patient and graft survival rates for recipients of DCD liver grafts and recipients of donation after brain death (DBD) liver grafts in a large series at a single transplant center. Two hundred liver transplants with DCD donors were performed between 1998 and 2010 at Mayo Clinic Florida. Logistic regression models were used in the univariate and multivariate analyses of predictors for the development of IC. Additional analyses using Cox regression models were performed to identify predictors of graft survival and to compare outcomes for DCD and DBD graft recipients. In our series, the patient survival rates for the DCD and DBD groups at 1, 3, and 5 years was 92.6%, 85%, and 80.9% and 89.8%, 83.0%, and 76.6%, respectively (P = not significant). The graft survival rates for the DCD and DBD groups at 1, 3, and 5 years were 80.9%, 72.7%, and 68.9% and 83.3%, 75.1%, and 68.6%, respectively (P = not significant). In the DCD group, 5 patients (2.5%) had primary nonfunction, 7 patients (3.5%) had hepatic artery thrombosis, and 3 patients (1.5%) experienced hepatic necrosis. IC was diagnosed in 24 patients (12%), and 11 of these patients (5.5%) required retransplantation. In the multivariate analysis, the asystole-to-cross clamp duration [odds ratio = 1.161, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.021-1.321] and African American recipient race (odds ratio = 5.374, 95% CI = 1.368-21.103) were identified as significant factors for predicting the development of IC (P < 0.05). This study has established a link between the development of IC and the asystole-to-cross clamp duration. Procurement techniques that prolong the nonperfusion period increase the risk for the development of IC in DCD liver grafts.
Copyright © 2011 American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 21837741     DOI: 10.1002/lt.22404

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Liver Transpl        ISSN: 1527-6465            Impact factor:   5.799


  25 in total

1.  Comparative effectiveness of donation after cardiac death versus donation after brain death liver transplantation: Recognizing who can benefit.

Authors:  Colleen L Jay; Anton I Skaro; Daniela P Ladner; Edward Wang; Vadim Lyuksemburg; Yaojen Chang; Hongmei Xu; Sandhya Talakokkla; Neehar Parikh; Jane L Holl; Gordon B Hazen; Michael M Abecassis
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 5.799

2.  Evolving utilization of donation after circulatory death livers in liver transplantation: The day of DCD has come.

Authors:  Omar Haque; Qing Yuan; Korkut Uygun; James F Markmann
Journal:  Clin Transplant       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 2.863

3.  Outcomes of Donation After Circulatory Death Liver Grafts From Donors 50 Years or Older: A Multicenter Analysis.

Authors:  Kristopher P Croome; Amit K Mathur; David D Lee; Adyr A Moss; Charles B Rosen; Julie K Heimbach; C Burcin Taner
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 4.  Donations After Circulatory Death in Liver Transplant.

Authors:  Emre A Eren; Nicholas Latchana; Eliza Beal; Don Hayes; Bryan Whitson; Sylvester M Black
Journal:  Exp Clin Transplant       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 0.945

5.  Is liver transplantation using organs donated after cardiac death cost-effective or does it decrease waitlist death by increasing recipient death?

Authors:  Leigh Anne Dageforde; Irene D Feurer; C Wright Pinson; Derek E Moore
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2012-07-04       Impact factor: 3.647

6.  Technical feasibility of liver transplantation without cold storage.

Authors:  S Gül; F Klein; G Puhl; P Neuhaus
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2013-12-08       Impact factor: 3.445

7.  Can we reduce ischemic cholangiopathy rates in donation after cardiac death liver transplantation after 10 years of practice? Canadian single-centre experience

Authors:  Kerollos Wanis
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 8.  Liver transplantation: Current status and challenges.

Authors:  Caroline C Jadlowiec; Timucin Taner
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-05-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 9.  Aetiology and risk factors of ischaemic cholangiopathy after liver transplantation.

Authors:  Moustafa Mabrouk Mourad; Abdullah Algarni; Christos Liossis; Simon R Bramhall
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Survival of recipients of livers from donation after circulatory death who are relisted and undergo retransplant for graft failure.

Authors:  A M Allen; W R Kim; H Xiong; J Liu; P G Stock; J R Lake; S Chinnakotla; J J Snyder; A K Israni; B L Kasiske
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2014-04-14       Impact factor: 8.086

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.