Literature DB >> 21837220

N-Methyl-2-oxo-1-phenyl-propan-1-aminium chloride.

Shi Juan Wang1.   

Abstract

In the structure of the title compound, C(10)H(14)NO(+)·Cl(-), both H atoms bound to nitro-gen are involved in N-H⋯Cl hydrogen-bonding inter-actions. These inter-actions join the cations and anions into dimeric units (two cations and two anions) with R(4) (2)(8) motifs lying about inversion centers.

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 21837220      PMCID: PMC3151816          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811024032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For the screening of mol­ecular salts with physicochemical properties, see: Tong & Whitesell et al. (1998 ▶); Shanker (1994 ▶). Over 40% of commercially available salts are hydro­chlorides (Gould et al., 1986 ▶), and this trend is reflected in the available set of salt structures included in the Cambridge Structural Database (Allen et al., 2002 ▶). For a closely related structure, see: Au & Tafeenko (1986 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C10H14NO+·Cl− M = 199.67 Monoclinic, a = 12.631 (3) Å b = 8.2564 (17) Å c = 11.423 (2) Å β = 114.63 (3)° V = 1082.9 (4) Å3 Z = 4 Mo Kα radiation μ = 0.32 mm−1 T = 293 K 0.20 × 0.20 × 0.20 mm

Data collection

Rigaku Mercury 2 diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrystalClear; Rigaku, 2002 ▶) T min = 0.825, T max = 1.000 10899 measured reflections 2486 independent reflections 1858 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.053

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.053 wR(F 2) = 0.172 S = 1.12 2486 reflections 118 parameters H-atom parameters constrained Δρmax = 0.27 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.20 e Å−3 Data collection: CrystalClear (Rigaku, 2002 ▶); cell refinement: CrystalClear; data reduction: CrystalClear; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: DIAMOND (Brandenburg, 1998 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶). Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811024032/yk2004sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811024032/yk2004Isup2.hkl Supplementary material file. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811024032/yk2004Isup3.cml Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C10H14NO+·ClF(000) = 424
Mr = 199.67Dx = 1.225 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ybcCell parameters from 2486 reflections
a = 12.631 (3) Åθ = 2.6–27.5°
b = 8.2564 (17) ŵ = 0.32 mm1
c = 11.423 (2) ÅT = 293 K
β = 114.63 (3)°Prism, colorless
V = 1082.9 (4) Å30.20 × 0.20 × 0.20 mm
Z = 4
Rigaku Mercury 2 diffractometer2486 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube1858 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
graphiteRint = 0.053
Detector resolution: 13.6612 pixels mm-1θmax = 27.5°, θmin = 3.0°
CCD_Profile_fitting scansh = −16→16
Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrystalClear; Rigaku, 2002)k = −10→10
Tmin = 0.825, Tmax = 1.000l = −14→14
10899 measured reflections
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.053Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.172H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.12w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.1P)2 + 0.0P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
2486 reflections(Δ/σ)max = 0.001
118 parametersΔρmax = 0.27 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = −0.20 e Å3
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Cl10.84648 (5)0.60715 (7)1.05463 (5)0.0477 (2)
N10.88712 (14)0.4261 (2)0.83566 (16)0.0372 (4)
H1A0.86330.46280.89490.045*
H1E0.96380.40490.87640.045*
C40.6325 (2)0.3894 (3)0.7610 (2)0.0557 (7)
H4A0.67210.44380.83840.067*
C50.82470 (17)0.2721 (2)0.78105 (19)0.0371 (5)
H5A0.85440.22860.72070.045*
C70.85316 (19)0.1511 (3)0.8920 (2)0.0429 (5)
C80.69366 (18)0.2949 (3)0.7093 (2)0.0396 (5)
C90.5129 (2)0.4023 (4)0.6973 (3)0.0725 (9)
H9A0.47240.46630.73170.087*
C100.8142 (3)−0.0187 (3)0.8562 (3)0.0646 (8)
H10A0.8363−0.08290.93290.097*
H10B0.8501−0.06180.80360.097*
H10C0.7311−0.02120.80910.097*
C110.6337 (2)0.2185 (3)0.5944 (2)0.0606 (7)
H11A0.67370.15780.55740.073*
C120.5143 (3)0.2308 (4)0.5332 (3)0.0782 (10)
H12A0.47460.17590.45610.094*
C130.4533 (2)0.3214 (4)0.5833 (3)0.0747 (9)
H13A0.37270.32860.54120.090*
C10.8697 (2)0.5566 (3)0.7395 (2)0.0535 (6)
H1B0.91260.65110.78240.080*
H1C0.78840.58260.69700.080*
H1D0.89700.52020.67710.080*
O20.90399 (18)0.1954 (2)1.00174 (16)0.0685 (6)
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Cl10.0439 (4)0.0545 (4)0.0443 (4)0.0016 (2)0.0181 (3)−0.0090 (2)
N10.0367 (10)0.0430 (10)0.0320 (9)0.0007 (7)0.0144 (8)0.0012 (7)
C40.0402 (13)0.081 (2)0.0412 (14)0.0042 (12)0.0126 (11)−0.0107 (12)
C50.0380 (11)0.0403 (11)0.0351 (11)0.0030 (9)0.0174 (9)0.0010 (9)
C70.0411 (12)0.0458 (12)0.0444 (13)0.0062 (10)0.0206 (10)0.0087 (10)
C80.0359 (11)0.0461 (13)0.0330 (11)−0.0001 (9)0.0106 (9)0.0020 (9)
C90.0463 (15)0.104 (3)0.0649 (18)0.0143 (15)0.0204 (14)−0.0088 (16)
C100.0814 (19)0.0464 (15)0.0628 (18)−0.0013 (13)0.0269 (15)0.0096 (12)
C110.0575 (16)0.0673 (17)0.0466 (14)0.0056 (13)0.0114 (12)−0.0156 (12)
C120.0593 (18)0.091 (2)0.0570 (17)−0.0015 (16)−0.0033 (14)−0.0222 (16)
C130.0389 (15)0.103 (2)0.0652 (19)0.0037 (15)0.0045 (13)−0.0044 (18)
C10.0651 (16)0.0445 (13)0.0481 (14)−0.0040 (12)0.0208 (12)0.0077 (10)
O20.0939 (15)0.0638 (13)0.0361 (10)0.0005 (10)0.0155 (9)0.0099 (8)
N1—C11.488 (3)C9—C131.375 (4)
N1—C51.489 (3)C9—H9A0.9300
N1—H1A0.9000C10—H10A0.9600
N1—H1E0.9000C10—H10B0.9600
C4—C91.380 (3)C10—H10C0.9600
C4—C81.391 (3)C11—C121.376 (4)
C4—H4A0.9300C11—H11A0.9300
C5—C81.522 (3)C12—C131.359 (4)
C5—C71.534 (3)C12—H12A0.9300
C5—H5A0.9800C13—H13A0.9300
C7—O21.203 (3)C1—H1B0.9600
C7—C101.486 (4)C1—H1C0.9600
C8—C111.366 (3)C1—H1D0.9600
C1—N1—C5114.80 (17)C4—C9—H9A119.7
C1—N1—H1A108.6C7—C10—H10A109.5
C5—N1—H1A108.6C7—C10—H10B109.5
C1—N1—H1E108.6H10A—C10—H10B109.5
C5—N1—H1E108.6C7—C10—H10C109.5
H1A—N1—H1E107.5H10A—C10—H10C109.5
C9—C4—C8119.9 (2)H10B—C10—H10C109.5
C9—C4—H4A120.0C8—C11—C12120.4 (3)
C8—C4—H4A120.0C8—C11—H11A119.8
N1—C5—C8112.75 (17)C12—C11—H11A119.8
N1—C5—C7108.00 (17)C13—C12—C11121.3 (3)
C8—C5—C7110.70 (17)C13—C12—H12A119.3
N1—C5—H5A108.4C11—C12—H12A119.3
C8—C5—H5A108.4C12—C13—C9118.9 (3)
C7—C5—H5A108.4C12—C13—H13A120.6
O2—C7—C10123.0 (2)C9—C13—H13A120.6
O2—C7—C5120.2 (2)N1—C1—H1B109.5
C10—C7—C5116.8 (2)N1—C1—H1C109.5
C11—C8—C4118.9 (2)H1B—C1—H1C109.5
C11—C8—C5120.2 (2)N1—C1—H1D109.5
C4—C8—C5120.9 (2)H1B—C1—H1D109.5
C13—C9—C4120.6 (3)H1C—C1—H1D109.5
C13—C9—H9A119.7
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N1—H1A···Cl10.902.263.1345 (19)163
N1—H1E···Cl1i0.902.193.0747 (19)167
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯AD—HH⋯ADAD—H⋯A
N1—H1A⋯Cl10.902.263.1345 (19)163
N1—H1E⋯Cl1i0.902.193.0747 (19)167

Symmetry code: (i) .

  3 in total

1.  The Cambridge Structural Database: a quarter of a million crystal structures and rising.

Authors:  Frank H Allen
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr B       Date:  2002-05-29

2.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

3.  In situ salt screening--a useful technique for discovery support and preformulation studies.

Authors:  W Q Tong; G Whitesell
Journal:  Pharm Dev Technol       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 3.133

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.