Literature DB >> 21836501

Image compression impact on quantitative angiogenesis analysis of ovarian epithelial neoplasms.

Jacqueline S Nicolosi1, Adriana O Yoshida, Luís O Z Sarian, Cleide A M Silva, Liliana A L A Andrade, Sophie F M Derchain, José Vassallo, André Almeida Schenka.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to investigate the impact of digital image compression on manual and semiautomatic quantification of angiogenesis in ovarian epithelial neoplasms (including benign, borderline, and malignant specimens).
DESIGN: We examined 405 digital images (obtained from a previously validated computer-assisted analysis system), which were equally divided into 5 groups: images captured in Tagged Image File Format (TIFF), low and high compression Joint Photographic Experts Group (JPEG) formats, and low and high compression JPEG images converted from the TIFF files. MEASUREMENTS: Microvessel density counts and CD34 endothelial areas manually and semiautomatically determined from TIFF images were compared with those from the other 4 groups.
RESULTS: Mostly, the correlations between TIFF and JPEG images were very high (intraclass correlation coefficients >0.8), especially for low compression JPEG images obtained by capture, regardless of the variable considered. The only exception consisted in the use of high compression JPEG files for semiautomatic microvessel density counts, which resulted in intraclass correlation coefficients of <0.7. Nonetheless, even then, interconversion between TIFF and JPEG values could be successfully achieved using prediction models established by linear regression.
CONCLUSION: Image compression does not seem to significantly compromise the accuracy of angiogenesis quantitation in the ovarian epithelial tumors, although low compression JPEG images should always be preferred over high compression ones.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 21836501     DOI: 10.1097/PAI.0b013e31821c501a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol        ISSN: 1533-4058


  3 in total

1.  Comment on "Quality evaluation of microscopy and scanned histological images for diagnostic purposes": Are scanners better than microscopes?

Authors:  Yukako Yagi; Liron Pantanowitz
Journal:  J Pathol Inform       Date:  2012-04-18

2.  Influence of study design on digital pathology image quality evaluation: the need to define a clinical task.

Authors:  Ljiljana Platiša; Leen Van Brantegem; Asli Kumcu; Richard Ducatelle; Wilfried Philips
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2017-06-21

3.  Impact of Altering Various Image Parameters on Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Image Analysis Data Quality.

Authors:  Liron Pantanowitz; Chi Liu; Yue Huang; Huazhang Guo; Gustavo K Rohde
Journal:  J Pathol Inform       Date:  2017-09-07
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.