UNLABELLED: Although exposure to secondhand smoke (SHS) is reportedly high in prison, few studies have measured this in the prison environment, and none have done so in Europe. We measured two indicators of SHS exposure (particulate matter PM10 and nicotine) in fixed locations before (2009) and after (2010) introduction of a partial smoking ban in a Swiss prison. Access to smoking cessation support was available to detainees throughout the study. OBJECTIVES: To measure SHS before and after the introduction of a partial smoking ban. METHODS: Assessment of particulate matter PM10 (suspended microparticles of 10 μm) and nicotine in ambient air, collected by real-time aerosol monitor and nicotine monitoring devices. RESULTS: The authors observed a significant improvement of nicotine concentrations in the air after the introduction of the smoking ban (before: 7.0 μg/m(3), after: 2.1 μg/m(3), difference 4.9 μg/m(3), 95% CI for difference: 0.52 to 9.8, p=0.03) but not in particulate matter PM10 (before: 0.11 mg/m(3), after: 0.06 mg/m(3), difference 0.06 mg/m(3), 95% CI for difference of means: -0.07 to 0.19, p=0.30). CONCLUSIONS: The partial smoking ban was followed by a decrease in nicotine concentrations in ambient air. These improvements can be attributed to the introduction of the smoking ban since no other policy change occurred during this period. Although this shows that concentrations of SHS decreased significantly, protection was still incomplete and further action is necessary to improve indoor air quality.
UNLABELLED: Although exposure to secondhand smoke (SHS) is reportedly high in prison, few studies have measured this in the prison environment, and none have done so in Europe. We measured two indicators of SHS exposure (particulate matter PM10 and nicotine) in fixed locations before (2009) and after (2010) introduction of a partial smoking ban in a Swiss prison. Access to smoking cessation support was available to detainees throughout the study. OBJECTIVES: To measure SHS before and after the introduction of a partial smoking ban. METHODS: Assessment of particulate matter PM10 (suspended microparticles of 10 μm) and nicotine in ambient air, collected by real-time aerosol monitor and nicotine monitoring devices. RESULTS: The authors observed a significant improvement of nicotine concentrations in the air after the introduction of the smoking ban (before: 7.0 μg/m(3), after: 2.1 μg/m(3), difference 4.9 μg/m(3), 95% CI for difference: 0.52 to 9.8, p=0.03) but not in particulate matter PM10 (before: 0.11 mg/m(3), after: 0.06 mg/m(3), difference 0.06 mg/m(3), 95% CI for difference of means: -0.07 to 0.19, p=0.30). CONCLUSIONS: The partial smoking ban was followed by a decrease in nicotine concentrations in ambient air. These improvements can be attributed to the introduction of the smoking ban since no other policy change occurred during this period. Although this shows that concentrations of SHS decreased significantly, protection was still incomplete and further action is necessary to improve indoor air quality.
Authors: Karine Moschetti; Pierre Stadelmann; Tenzin Wangmo; Alberto Holly; Patrick Bodenmann; Jean-Blaise Wasserfallen; Bernice S Elger; Bruno Gravier Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2015-09-10 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Sean Semple; Helen Sweeting; Evangelia Demou; Greig Logan; Rachel O'Donnell; Kate Hunt Journal: Ann Work Expo Health Date: 2017-08-01 Impact factor: 2.179
Authors: Leah R Jayes; Elena Ratschen; Rachael L Murray; Suzy Dymond-White; John Britton Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2016-02-04 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Carla J Berg; Samantha A Smith; Ta Misha Bascombe; Nino Maglakelidze; Lela Starua; Marina Topuridze Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2016-01-25 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Evangelia Demou; Ruaraidh Dobson; Helen Sweeting; Ashley Brown; Scott Sidwell; Rachel O'Donnell; Kate Hunt; Sean Semple Journal: Ann Work Expo Health Date: 2020-11-16 Impact factor: 2.779