Literature DB >> 21835953

Aspirin or enoxaparin thromboprophylaxis for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma treated with lenalidomide.

Alessandra Larocca1, Federica Cavallo, Sara Bringhen, Francesco Di Raimondo, Anna Falanga, Andrea Evangelista, Maide Cavalli, Anfisa Stanevsky, Paolo Corradini, Sara Pezzatti, Francesca Patriarca, Michele Cavo, Jacopo Peccatori, Lucio Catalano, Angelo Michele Carella, Anna Maria Cafro, Agostina Siniscalchi, Claudia Crippa, Maria Teresa Petrucci, Dina Ben Yehuda, Eloise Beggiato, Tommaso Caravita Di Toritto, Mario Boccadoro, Arnon Nagler, Antonio Palumbo.   

Abstract

Lenalidomide plus dexamethasone is effective in the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM) but is associated with an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). This prospective, open-label, randomized substudy of a phase 3 trial compared the efficacy and safety of thromboprophylaxis with low-dose aspirin (ASA) or low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) in patients with newly diagnosed MM, treated with lenalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone induction and melphalan-prednisone-lenalidomide consolidation. Overall, 342 patients who did not have clinical indications or contraindications to antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy were randomly assigned to receive ASA 100 mg/d (n = 176) or LMWH enoxaparin 40 mg/d (n = 166). The incidence of VTE was 2.27% in the ASA group and 1.20% in the LMWH group. Compared with LMWH, the absolute difference in the proportion of VTE was 1.07% (95% confidence interval, -1.69-3.83; P = .452) in the ASA group. Pulmonary embolism was observed in 1.70% of patients in the ASA group and none in the LMWH group. No arterial thrombosis, acute cardiovascular events, or sudden deaths were reported. No major hemorrhagic complications were reported. In previously untreated patients with MM receiving lenalidomide with a low thromboembolic risk, ASA could be an effective and less-expensive alternative to LMWH thromboprophylaxis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21835953     DOI: 10.1182/blood-2011-03-344333

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood        ISSN: 0006-4971            Impact factor:   22.113


  79 in total

Review 1.  Approach to chemotherapy-associated thrombosis.

Authors:  Peter Oppelt; Anthony Betbadal; Lalitha Nayak
Journal:  Vasc Med       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 3.239

2.  Canadian consensus recommendations on the management of venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer. Part 1: prophylaxis.

Authors:  J C Easaw; M A Shea-Budgell; C M J Wu; P M Czaykowski; J Kassis; B Kuehl; H J Lim; M MacNeil; D Martinusen; P A McFarlane; E Meek; O Moodley; S Shivakumar; V Tagalakis; S Welch; P Kavan
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 3.677

3.  Multiple myeloma: 2018 update on diagnosis, risk‐stratification, and management

Authors: 
Journal:  Am J Hematol       Date:  2018-08-16       Impact factor: 10.047

4.  Silent venous thromboembolism in multiple myeloma patients treated with lenalidomide.

Authors:  Atsushi Isoda; Naru Sato; Yuri Miyazawa; Yoshinobu Matsumoto; Mina Koumoto; Masahito Ookawa; Morio Sawamura; Morio Matsumoto
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 2.490

Review 5.  Venous thrombosis and cancer: from mouse models to clinical trials.

Authors:  Y Hisada; J E Geddings; C Ay; N Mackman
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2015-06-26       Impact factor: 5.824

Review 6.  Cardiovascular Complications Associated with Multiple Myeloma Therapies: Incidence, Pathophysiology, and Management.

Authors:  Vivek G Patel; Robert F Cornell
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 5.075

7.  Thromboprophylaxis in multiple myeloma: is the evidence there?

Authors:  Sigurdur Yngvi Kristinsson; Ola Landgren
Journal:  Expert Rev Anticancer Ther       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 4.512

8.  Outpatient thromboprophylaxis with low-molecular-weight heparin in solid tumors: Where do we stand today?

Authors:  Thein Hlaing Oo
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 9.  Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis for ambulatory cancer patients, can we do better?

Authors:  Hikmat Abdel-Razeq; Asem Mansour
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 2.300

10.  Predicting venous thromboembolism in multiple myeloma: development and validation of the IMPEDE VTE score.

Authors:  Kristen M Sanfilippo; Suhong Luo; Tzu-Fei Wang; Mark Fiala; Martin Schoen; Tanya M Wildes; Joseph Mikhael; Nicole M Kuderer; David C Calverley; Jesse Keller; Theodore Thomas; Kenneth R Carson; Brian F Gage
Journal:  Am J Hematol       Date:  2019-08-19       Impact factor: 10.047

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.