Literature DB >> 21835943

Pedicle marrow signal hyperintensity on short tau inversion recovery- and t2-weighted images: prevalence and relationship to clinical symptoms.

B Borg1, M T Modic, N Obuchowski, G Cheah.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Lumbar pedicle marrow hyperintense signal on T2- and STIR-weighted images is not an uncommon finding. We hypothesize that these marrow signal intensity changes and their behavior within the pedicle are associated with clinical symptoms and that their improvement or resolution correlates with clinical improvement. We investigated the prevalence of these pedicle marrow changes, associated morphologic abnormalities, and the relationship to symptoms over time.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Prevalence was evaluated prospectively in 246 patients and retrospectively in 400 patients. To analyze the relationship between changes in signal intensity over time and symptoms, a third group of 30 patients was followed clinically for assessment of pain and functional limitation and with MR studies for 18 months or until signal intensity changes resolved.
RESULTS: The prevalence of pedicle marrow hyperintensity on T2 and STIR-weighted sequences was 1.7%. Associated morphologic abnormalities were pars interarticularis and pedicle fractures and degenerative facets. In the longitudinal study, pedicle marrow signal hyperintensity on T2- and STIR-weighted images resolved in 17 patients and persisted in 5 patients. The extent, intensity, and resolution of signal intensity changes significantly related to the degree of functional limitation (P = .01).
CONCLUSIONS: Resolution of pedicle marrow hyperintensity on T2 and STIR-weighted images was associated with improved functional testing and a trend toward decreased pain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21835943      PMCID: PMC7965367          DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A2588

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol        ISSN: 0195-6108            Impact factor:   3.825


  34 in total

1.  Pedicle marrow signal intensity changes in the lumbar spine: a manifestation of facet degenerative joint disease.

Authors:  J L Morrison; P A Kaplan; R G Dussault; M W Anderson
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Vertebral body MRI related to lumbar fusion results.

Authors:  G R Buttermann; K B Heithoff; J W Ogilvie; E E Transfeldt; M Cohen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  MR imaging of lumbar spondylolysis: the importance of ancillary observations.

Authors:  J L Ulmer; V P Mathews; A D Elster; L P Mark; D L Daniels; W Mueller
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Degenerative disk disease: assessment of changes in vertebral body marrow with MR imaging.

Authors:  M T Modic; P M Steinberg; J S Ross; T J Masaryk; J R Carter
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 5.  The value of fat saturation sequences and contrast medium administration in MRI of degenerative disease of the posterior/perispinal elements of the lumbosacral spine.

Authors:  P D'Aprile; A Tarantino; J R Jinkins; D Brindicci
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-05-30       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Course of Modic 1 six months after lumbar posterior osteosynthesis.

Authors:  J M Vital; O Gille; V Pointillart; M Pedram; P Bacon; F Razanabola; C Schaelderle; S Azzouz
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2003-04-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Occult cartilage and bone injuries of the knee: detection, classification, and assessment with MR imaging.

Authors:  J H Mink; A L Deutsch
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Mechanical loading histories and cortical bone remodeling.

Authors:  D R Carter
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 4.333

Review 9.  Stress fractures: current concepts.

Authors:  R H Daffner; H Pavlov
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 3.959

10.  Modic changes in endplates of lumbar vertebral bodies: prevalence and association with low back and sciatic pain among middle-aged male workers.

Authors:  Mari Kuisma; Jaro Karppinen; Jaakko Niinimäki; Risto Ojala; Marianne Haapea; Markku Heliövaara; Raija Korpelainen; Simo Taimela; Antero Natri; Osmo Tervonen
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2007-05-01       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  The value of magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography in the study of spinal disorders.

Authors:  Fernando Ruiz Santiago; Antonio Jesús Láinez Ramos-Bossini; Yì Xiáng J Wáng; José Pablo Martínez Barbero; Jade García Espinosa; Alberto Martínez Martínez
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2022-07

2.  Utility of STIR-MRI in Detecting the Pain Generator in Asymmetric Bilateral Pars Fracture: A Report of 5 Cases.

Authors:  Kazuta Yamashita; Toshinori Sakai; Yoichiro Takata; Fumio Hayashi; Fumitake Tezuka; Masatoshi Morimoto; Yutaka Kinoshita; Akihiro Nagamachi; Takashi Chikawa; Hiroshi Yonezu; Kosaku Higashino; Tadanori Sakamaki; Koichi Sairyo
Journal:  Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)       Date:  2017-12-25       Impact factor: 1.742

3.  Signal intensity changes of the posterior elements of the lumbar spine in symptomatic adults.

Authors:  Kosuke Sugiura; Toshinori Sakai; Fumitake Tezuka; Kazuta Yamashita; Yoichiro Takata; Kosaku Higashino; Akihiro Nagamachi; Koichi Sairyo
Journal:  Spine Surg Relat Res       Date:  2017-12-20

4.  Association of MRI-defined lumbar paraspinal muscle mass and slip percentage in degenerative and isthmic spondylolisthesis: A multicenter, retrospective, observational study.

Authors:  Jae-Hyun Park; Koh-Woon Kim; Yousuk Youn; Hyungsuk Kim; Won-Seok Chung; Mi-Yeon Song; Jae-Heung Cho
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 1.889

Review 5.  Informed appropriate imaging for low back pain management: A narrative review.

Authors:  Yì Xiáng J Wáng; Ai-Min Wu; Fernando Ruiz Santiago; Marcello H Nogueira-Barbosa
Journal:  J Orthop Translat       Date:  2018-08-27       Impact factor: 5.191

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.