Literature DB >> 2183590

Evaluating tests for acute pancreatitis.

N Agarwal1, C S Pitchumoni, A V Sivaprasad.   

Abstract

The relative merits of various serum pancreatic enzymes, ultrasonography (US), and computerized tomography (CT) have been evaluated. In practice, the diagnosis of acute pancreatitis (AP) remains hinged on the clinical picture and elevated serum amylase. The advantages of total serum amylase are its technical simplicity, ready availability, and sensitivity. Within 24 h of onset of symptoms, elevation of amylase is as sensitive as that of lipase, pancreatic isoamylase, immunoreactive trypsin, or elastase. However, after the first hospital day, it is the least sensitive of the enzymatic tests. Its greatest disadvantage is its overall low specificity. Lipase assays are now fast, reliable, practical, more specific, almost as sensitive, and not more expensive than amylase assays. The current feeling is that lipase assays should be used more often or even should replace amylase assays. However, comparative studies using objective criteria for AP are required to evaluate the utility of lipase estimations over that of amylase. Other enzymes such as P-isoamylase, immunoreactive trypsin, chymotrypsin, or elastase are more cumbersome, expensive, and not better than lipase. They should be reserved for cases of doubtful diagnoses. The levels of these pancreatic enzymes neither correlate with the severity of the disease nor can they accurately predict the subsequent clinical course of the patients. The main role of ultrasonography remains in the evaluation of the biliary tract in AP. The contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) is useful for estimating the presence and extent of pancreatic necrosis. Thereby, it enables prompt recognition of patients at high risk for systemic and local complications. Routine use of CECT may aid in the identification of pancreatitis when enzyme elevations are modest, but the utility of the procedure in all clinically mild cases is questionable. Patients who are seriously ill or who present a diagnostic problem should have a CECT. A normal CT under such circumstances excludes clinically severe AP. Serial CT should be done in patients demonstrating phlegmonous extrapancreatic spread.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2183590

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0002-9270            Impact factor:   10.864


  21 in total

Review 1.  A case study and review of pancreatitis in the AIDS population.

Authors:  Arvind J Trindade; AnnMarie Huysman; Shirish S Huprikar; Michelle K Kim
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2008-02-21       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 2.  Acute pancreatitis in children and adolescents.

Authors:  Mitsuyoshi Suzuki; Jin Kan Sai; Toshiaki Shimizu
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Pathophysiol       Date:  2014-11-15

3.  Trypsinogen activation peptides (TAP) in peritoneal fluid as predictors of late histopathologic injury in necrotizing pancreatitis of the rat.

Authors:  J Schmidt; E Ryschich; H P Sinn; S Maksan; C Herfarth; E Klar
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  Does subclinical pancreatic inflammation occur after parathyroidectomy?

Authors:  G S Robertson; P J Gibson; N J London; P R Johnson; S J Iqbal; P R Bell
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 1.891

5.  Histopathologic correlates of serum amylase activity in acute experimental pancreatitis.

Authors:  J Schmidt; K Lewandrowski; C Fernandez-del Castillo; U Mandavilli; C C Compton; A L Warshaw; D W Rattner
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 3.199

6.  Technetium-99m hexamethylpropylene amine oxime leucocyte scintigraphy in the early course of mild acute pancreatitis following endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.

Authors:  J C Mortensen; J J Jensen; N Thorsgaard
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1996-11

7.  Melatonin modulates the severity of taurocholate-induced acute pancreatitis in the rat.

Authors:  Kaptan Gülben; Hakan Ozdemir; Uğur Berberoğlu; Hahan Mersin; Fikret Yrkin; Ebru Cakýr; Sebahat Aksaray
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2009-04-28       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 8.  Pancreatitis in children--experience with 43 cases.

Authors:  C Y Yeung; H C Lee; F Y Huang; M Y Ho; H A Kao; D C Liang; C H Hsu; H Y Hung; P Y Chang; J C Sheu
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 3.183

9.  JPN Guidelines for the management of acute pancreatitis: diagnostic criteria for acute pancreatitis.

Authors:  Masaru Koizumi; Tadahiro Takada; Yoshifumi Kawarada; Koichi Hirata; Toshihiko Mayumi; Masahiro Yoshida; Miho Sekimoto; Masahiko Hirota; Yasutoshi Kimura; Kazunori Takeda; Shuji Isaji; Makoto Otsuki; Seiki Matsuno
Journal:  J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg       Date:  2006

Review 10.  Acute biliary pancreatitis: diagnosis and treatment.

Authors:  Zakaria M Hazem
Journal:  Saudi J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.485

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.