Literature DB >> 21835588

The value of a carotid duplex surveillance program for stroke prevention.

David L Cull1, Terry Cole, Blair Miller, Brent Johnson, Dustin Rawlinson, Eric Walker, Spence M Taylor.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although duplex ultrasonography (DU) can readily identify progression of carotid stenosis, controversy regarding the natural history of asymptomatic carotid stenosis as well as the need and appropriate interval for carotid DU surveillance still exists. Furthermore, consensus has not yet been made in the surgical literature regarding the usefulness, cost-effectiveness, or timing of DU surveillance after carotid endarterectomy (CEA). The purpose of this study was to determine how often DU surveillance for asymptomatic carotid disease or postintervention stenosis resulted in any change in the patient's clinical management, how many strokes were prevented by DU surveillance, and the cost of such a DU surveillance program per stroke prevented.
METHODS: We reviewed a 9-year vascular surgical database to identify all patients enrolled in a carotid DU surveillance program for asymptomatic carotid stenosis or following CEA between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2008. The number of duplex scans and CEAs performed in those patients through March 2010 was also determined. The results of the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study were then used to estimate the number of strokes prevented by CEA in the study population. Reimbursement data were assessed to calculate the average cost of each DU and the cost of the DU surveillance program for each stroke prevented.
RESULTS: During the study period, there were 11,531 carotid duplex scans performed on 3,003 patients (mean: 3.84 scans per patient) who had been enrolled in the DU surveillance program. CEA for asymptomatic carotid stenosis was performed on 225 (7.5%) patients. The DU surveillance program prevented approximately 13 strokes (871 carotid duplex scans per stroke prevented). The mean cost of each duplex scan was $332 ± 170. The total cost of the DU surveillance program was approximately $3,830,000 or $290,000 per stroke prevented.
CONCLUSIONS: Although a carotid DU surveillance program generates substantial revenue for a vascular surgery practice, it is costly and inefficient. A reappraisal of the "value" of carotid DU surveillance in stroke prevention is warranted. Consideration should be given to eliminating routine surveillance of postendarterectomy carotids in the absence of contralateral disease and limiting the number of DU surveillance studies for asymptomatic carotid disease.
Copyright © 2011 Annals of Vascular Surgery Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21835588     DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2011.05.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0890-5096            Impact factor:   1.466


  5 in total

1.  The value and economic analysis of routine postoperative carotid duplex ultrasound surveillance after carotid endarterectomy.

Authors:  Ali F AbuRahma; Mohit Srivastava; Zachary AbuRahma; Will Jackson; Albeir Mousa; Patrick A Stone; L Scott Dean; Jason Green
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2015-05-09       Impact factor: 4.268

2.  Prediction of Long-Term Restenosis After Carotid Endarterectomy Using Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Angiography.

Authors:  Lukas Andereggen; Sepideh Amin-Hanjani; Jürgen Beck; Markus M Luedi; Jan Gralla; Gerrit A Schubert; Angelo Tortora; Robert H Andres; Marcel Arnold; Andreas Raabe; Michael Reinert
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 4.086

3.  MR imaging-detected carotid plaque hemorrhage is stable for 2 years and a marker for stenosis progression.

Authors:  R J Simpson; S Akwei; A A Hosseini; S T MacSweeney; D P Auer; N Altaf
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  Prevalence and risk factors for atherosclerotic carotid stenosis and plaque: A population-based screening study.

Authors:  Shin Young Woo; Jin Hyun Joh; Sang-Ah Han; Ho-Chul Park
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 1.889

5.  Validation of Risk Prediction Models to Detect Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis.

Authors:  Michiel H F Poorthuis; Alison Halliday; M Sofia Massa; Paul Sherliker; Rachel Clack; Dylan R Morris; Robert Clarke; Gert J de Borst; Richard Bulbulia; Sarah Lewington
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2020-04-20       Impact factor: 5.501

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.