Literature DB >> 21835379

Prediction of life-threatening arrhythmic events in patients with chronic myocardial infarction by contrast-enhanced CMR.

Philipp Boyé1, Hassan Abdel-Aty, Udo Zacharzowsky, Steffen Bohl, Carsten Schwenke, Rob J van der Geest, Rainer Dietz, Alexander Schirdewan, Jeanette Schulz-Menger.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We hypothesized that infarct transmurality assessed with late gadolinium enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance (LGE-CMR) predicts arrhythmic events in patients with chronic myocardial infarction.
BACKGROUND: Patients with decreased left ventricular function due to chronic myocardial infarction are at increased risk for life-threatening arrhythmias related to infarcted tissue. LGE-CMR accurately detects infarct morphology.
METHODS: We prospectively enrolled 52 patients with chronic myocardial infarction referred for primary preventive implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation following MADIT (Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial) study criteria. Using LGE-CMR, left ventricular volumes, function, and infarct morphology were assessed including calculation of total and relative infarct mass, infarct border, infarct border zone, and infarct transmurality.
RESULTS: Patients were followed for 1,235 ± 341 days. The primary combined endpoint including appropriate device therapy (ICD discharge or antitachycardia pacing) or death from cardiac cause occurred in 16 individuals resulting in an annual event rate of 4.7%. Six patients received an appropriate shock, 7 patients received recurrent appropriate antitachycardia pacing for sustained ventricular tachycardia, and 3 patients died of cardiac cause. There was a significant association to relative infarct mass (38 ± 8% vs. 28 ± 14%, p = 0.02), infarct transmurality (24 ± 8 g vs. 16 ± 12 g, p = 0.02), and relative infarct transmurality (RIT) (63 ± 12% vs. 48 ± 23%, p = 0.01). In separate logistic regression models, no variable emerged as significant when combined with RIT. As a single effect, RIT emerged as a predictor of the primary endpoint (p = 0.02). A RIT cutoff at 43% resulted in a sensitivity of 88%, a specificity of 50%, a positive predictive value of 44%, and a negative predictive value of 90%.
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with chronic myocardial infarction scheduled for primary preventive ICD implantation, infarct transmurality as defined by LGE-CMR identifies a subgroup with increased risk for life-threatening arrhythmias and cardiac death.
Copyright © 2011 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21835379     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2011.04.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1876-7591


  17 in total

1.  Image-based left ventricular shape analysis for sudden cardiac death risk stratification.

Authors:  Fijoy Vadakkumpadan; Natalia Trayanova; Katherine C Wu
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 6.343

Review 2.  Cardiac magnetic resonance for prediction of arrhythmogenic areas.

Authors:  Esra Gucuk Ipek; Saman Nazarian
Journal:  Trends Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2015-03-03       Impact factor: 6.677

3.  Quantitative analysis of late gadolinium enhancement in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: comparison of diagnostic performance in myocardial fibrosis between gadobutrol and gadopentetate dimeglumine.

Authors:  Dongting Liu; Xiaohai Ma; Jiayi Liu; Lei Zhao; Hui Chen; Lei Xu; Zhonghua Sun; Zhanming Fan
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2017-03-13       Impact factor: 2.357

4.  Prevalence and clinical relevance of the morphological substrate of ventricular arrhythmias in patients without known cardiac conditions detected by cardiovascular MR.

Authors:  J Weisser-Thomas; V A Ferrari; A Lakghomi; L M Lickfett; G Nickenig; H H Schild; D Thomas
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-04-09       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Virtual electrophysiological study in a 3-dimensional cardiac magnetic resonance imaging model of porcine myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Jason Ng; Jason T Jacobson; Justin K Ng; David Gordon; Daniel C Lee; James C Carr; Jeffrey J Goldberger
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 6.  The scar: the wind in the perfect storm-insights into the mysterious living tissue originating ventricular arrhythmias.

Authors:  C Pandozi; Marco Valerio Mariani; C Chimenti; V Maestrini; D Filomena; M Magnocavallo; M Straito; A Piro; M Russo; M Galeazzi; S Ficili; F Colivicchi; P Severino; M Mancone; F Fedele; C Lavalle
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2022-01-24       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 7.  Late gadolinium enhancement on cardiac magnetic resonance predicts adverse cardiovascular outcomes in nonischemic cardiomyopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sujith Kuruvilla; Nebiyu Adenaw; Arabindra B Katwal; Michael J Lipinski; Christopher M Kramer; Michael Salerno
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2013-12-20       Impact factor: 7.792

8.  Scar extent evaluated by late gadolinium enhancement CMR: a powerful predictor of long term appropriate ICD therapy in patients with coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Joachim Alexandre; Eric Saloux; Audrey Emmanuelle Dugué; Alain Lebon; Adrien Lemaitre; Vincent Roule; Fabien Labombarda; Nicole Provost; Sophie Gomes; Patrice Scanu; Paul Milliez
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2013-01-19       Impact factor: 5.364

9.  Prospective, randomized comparison of gadopentetate and gadobutrol to assess chronic myocardial infarction applying cardiovascular magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Andre Rudolph; Daniel Messroghli; Florian von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff; Julius Traber; Johannes Schüler; Ralf Wassmuth; Jeanette Schulz-Menger
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 1.930

10.  Iron deposition following chronic myocardial infarction as a substrate for cardiac electrical anomalies: initial findings in a canine model.

Authors:  Ivan Cokic; Avinash Kali; Xunzhang Wang; Hsin-Jung Yang; Richard L Q Tang; Anees Thajudeen; Michael Shehata; Allen M Amorn; Enzhao Liu; Brian Stewart; Nathan Bennett; Doron Harlev; Sotirios A Tsaftaris; Warren M Jackman; Sumeet S Chugh; Rohan Dharmakumar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-16       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.