Literature DB >> 21834800

Long-term intermittent hyperoxic exposures do not enhance erythropoiesis.

Michail E Keramidas1, Barbara Norman, Thomas Gustafsson, Ola Eiken, Igor B Mekjavic.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Based on a report of a marked increase in the erythropoietin concentration ([EPO]) a few hours after the cessation of a single 2-h session of O(2) breathing, short periods of O(2) administration have been advocated as a therapy for anaemia. Accordingly, the purpose of the present study was to evaluate this theory by investigating the effect of 10 daily short-term exposures to normobaric O(2) over a 2-week period on the plasma [EPO] in healthy individuals.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty men were assigned to either an experimental (NBO(2)) or to a control (AIR) group. The NBO(2) group breathed 100% normobaric O(2) for 2 h every weekday over a 2-week period. The AIR group breathed air within the same time protocol. Blood samples were collected at the pre-, mid- and post-intervention periods to determine [EPO].
RESULTS: [EPO] of the NBO(2) group was significantly lower than that of the AIR group during the mid- and post-periods (P < 0·001). [EPO] of the NBO(2) group showed a slight, albeit statistically nonsignificant, decrease during the mid (∼11%)- and post (∼16%)-periods.
CONCLUSIONS: Daily short-term exposures to normobaric hyperoxia do not increase the [EPO] in healthy individuals. The increased O(2) tension suppresses [EPO]. Hence, administration of pure O(2) to enhance erythropoiesis is not warranted.
© 2011 The Authors. European Journal of Clinical Investigation © 2011 Stichting European Society for Clinical Investigation Journal Foundation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21834800     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2362.2011.02578.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Invest        ISSN: 0014-2972            Impact factor:   4.686


  3 in total

1.  Hypoxia, a multifaceted phenomenon: the example of the "normobaric oxygen paradox".

Authors:  C Balestra; P Germonpré
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2012-03-31       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Prevailing evidence contradicts the notion of a "normobaric oxygen paradox".

Authors:  Michail E Keramidas; Ola Eiken; Igor B Mekjavic
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2012-03-31       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Increasing Oxygen Partial Pressures Induce a Distinct Transcriptional Response in Human PBMC: A Pilot Study on the "Normobaric Oxygen Paradox".

Authors:  Deborah Fratantonio; Fabio Virgili; Alessandro Zucchi; Kate Lambrechts; Tiziana Latronico; Pierre Lafère; Peter Germonpré; Costantino Balestra
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-01-05       Impact factor: 5.923

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.