Literature DB >> 21834073

Effects of capsid-modified oncolytic adenoviruses and their combinations with gemcitabine or silica gel on pancreatic cancer.

Lotta Kangasniemi1, Suvi Parviainen, Tommi Pisto, Mika Koskinen, Mika Jokinen, Tuula Kiviluoto, Vincenzo Cerullo, Harry Jalonen, Anniina Koski, Anna Kangasniemi, Anna Kanerva, Sari Pesonen, Akseli Hemminki.   

Abstract

Conventional cancer treatments often have little impact on the course of advanced pancreatic cancer. Although cancer gene therapy with adenoviruses is a promising developmental approach, the primary receptor is poorly expressed in pancreatic cancers which might compromise efficacy and thus targeting to other receptors could be beneficial. Extended stealth delivery, combination with standard chemotherapy or circumvention of host antiadenoviral immune response might improve efficacy further. In this work, capsid-modified adenoviruses were studied for transduction of cell lines and clinical normal and tumor tissue samples. The respective oncolytic viruses were tested for oncolytic activity in vitro and in vivo. Survival was studied in a peritoneally disseminated pancreas cancer model, with or without concurrent gemcitabine while silica implants were utilized for extended intraperitoneal virus delivery. Immunocompetent mice and Syrian hamsters were used to study the effect of silica mediated delivery on antiviral immune responses and subsequent in vivo gene delivery. Capsid modifications selectively enhanced gene transfer to malignant pancreatic cancer cell lines and clinical samples. The respective oncolytic viruses resulted in increased cell killing in vitro, which translated into a survival benefit in mice. Early proinfammatory cytokine responses and formation of antiviral neutralizing antibodies was partially avoided with silica implants. The implant also shielded the virus from pre-existing neutralizing antibodies, while increasing the pancreas/liver gene delivery ratio six-fold. In conclusion, capsid modified adenoviruses would be useful for testing in pancreatic cancer trials. Silica implants might increase the safety and efficacy of the approach.
Copyright © 2011 UICC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21834073     DOI: 10.1002/ijc.26370

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cancer        ISSN: 0020-7136            Impact factor:   7.396


  5 in total

Review 1.  Genomic Signature of the Natural Oncolytic Herpes Simplex Virus HF10 and Its Therapeutic Role in Preclinical and Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Ibrahim Ragab Eissa; Yoshinori Naoe; Itzel Bustos-Villalobos; Toru Ichinose; Maki Tanaka; Wu Zhiwen; Nobuaki Mukoyama; Taishi Morimoto; Noriyuki Miyajima; Hasegawa Hitoki; Seiji Sumigama; Branko Aleksic; Yasuhiro Kodera; Hideki Kasuya
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 6.244

2.  A Phase I clinical trial of EUS-guided intratumoral injection of the oncolytic virus, HF10 for unresectable locally advanced pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Yoshiki Hirooka; Hideki Kasuya; Takuya Ishikawa; Hiroki Kawashima; Eizaburo Ohno; Itzel B Villalobos; Yoshinori Naoe; Toru Ichinose; Nobuto Koyama; Maki Tanaka; Yasuhiro Kodera; Hidemi Goto
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2018-05-25       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 3.  Win or loss? Combination therapy does improve the oncolytic virus therapy to pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Wenhao Luo; Yawen Wang; Taiping Zhang
Journal:  Cancer Cell Int       Date:  2022-04-20       Impact factor: 6.429

Review 4.  Pharmacological modulation of anti-tumor immunity induced by oncolytic viruses.

Authors:  Nicole E Forbes; Ramya Krishnan; Jean-Simon Diallo
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2014-07-23       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 5.  Cancer immunotherapy via combining oncolytic virotherapy with chemotherapy: recent advances.

Authors:  Guy R Simpson; Kate Relph; Kevin Harrington; Alan Melcher; Hardev Pandha
Journal:  Oncolytic Virother       Date:  2016-01-06
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.