Literature DB >> 21833833

[Bullet and shrapnel injuries in the face and neck regions. Current aspects of wound ballistics].

T Hauer1, N Huschitt, M Kulla, B Kneubuehl, C Willy.   

Abstract

A basic understanding of the ballistic behaviour of projectiles or fragments after entering the human body is essential for the head and neck surgeon in the military environment in order to anticipate the diagnostic and therapeutic consequences of this type of injury. Although a large number of factors influence the missile in flight and after penetration of the body, the most important factor is the amount of energy transmitted to the tissue. Long guns (rifles or shotguns) have a much higher muzzle energy compared to handguns, explaining why the remote effects beyond the bullet track play a major role. While most full metal jacket bullets release their energy after 12-20 cm (depending on the calibre), soft point bullets release their energy immediately after entry into the human body. This results in a major difference in extremity wounds, but not so much in injuries with long bullet paths (e.g. diagonal shots). Shrapnel wounds are usually produced with similarly high kinetic energy to those caused by hand- and long guns. However, fragments tend to dissipate the entire amount of energy within the body, which increases the degree of tissue disruption. Of all relevant injuries in the head and neck region, soft tissue injuries make up the largest proportion (60%), while injuries to the face are seen three times more often than injuries to the neck. Concomitant intracranial or spinal injury is seen in 30% of cases. Due to high levels of wound contamination, the infection rate is approximately 15%, often associated with a complicated and/or multiresistant spectrum of germs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21833833     DOI: 10.1007/s00106-011-2365-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HNO        ISSN: 0017-6192            Impact factor:   1.284


  31 in total

Review 1.  Face, neck, and eye protection: adapting body armour to counter the changing patterns of injuries on the battlefield.

Authors:  J Breeze; I Horsfall; A Hepper; J Clasper
Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2010-10-30       Impact factor: 1.651

2.  [Medical support of Russian Armed Forces: the results and perspectives].

Authors:  V V Shappo
Journal:  Voen Med Zh       Date:  2008-01

3.  The wound profile: illustration of the missile-tissue interaction.

Authors:  M L Fackler; R F Bellamy; J A Malinowski
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  1988-01

4.  Orthopaedic aspects of war wounds in South Vietnam.

Authors:  K F King
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1969-02-01

5.  Surgical and pathological evaluation of vascular injuries in Vietnam.

Authors:  N M Rich; W C Manion; C W Hughes
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  1969-04

6.  Analysis of battlefield head and neck injuries in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Authors:  Michael S Xydakis; Michael D Fravell; Katherine E Nasser; John D Casler
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.497

7.  Delayed evaluation of combat-related penetrating neck trauma.

Authors:  Charles J Fox; David L Gillespie; Michael A Weber; Mitchell W Cox; Jason S Hawksworth; Chad M Cryer; Norman M Rich; Sean D O'Donnell
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.268

8.  Characterization of craniomaxillofacial battle injuries sustained by United States service members in the current conflicts of Iraq and Afghanistan.

Authors:  Timothy A Lew; John A Walker; Joseph C Wenke; Lorne H Blackbourne; Robert G Hale
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.895

9.  Maxillofacial injuries in military personnel treated at the Royal Centre for Defence Medicine June 2001 to December 2007.

Authors:  J Breeze; A J Gibbons; N J Opie; A Monaghan
Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2009-11-07       Impact factor: 1.651

10.  Maxillofacial injuries caused by terrorist bomb attack in Nairobi, Kenya.

Authors:  W A Odhiambo; S W Guthua; F G Macigo; M K Akama
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.789

View more
  3 in total

1.  Penetrating Foreign Bodies in Head and Neck Trauma: A Surgical Challenge.

Authors:  Jan Oliver Voss; Nadine Thieme; Christian Doll; Stefan Hartwig; Nicolai Adolphs; Max Heiland; Jan-Dirk Raguse
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2018-04-24

2.  Comparison of gunshot entrance morphologies caused by .40-caliber Smith & Wesson, .380-caliber, and 9-mm Luger bullets: a finite element analysis study.

Authors:  Rodrigo Ivo Matoso; Alexandre Rodrigues Freire; Leonardo Soriano de Mello Santos; Eduardo Daruge Junior; Ana Claudia Rossi; Felippe Bevilacqua Prado
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-24       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Management challenges in a short-range low-velocity gunshot injury.

Authors:  K V Arunkumar; Sanjeev Kumar; Rajat Aggarwal; Prajesh Dubey
Journal:  Ann Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2012-07
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.