| Literature DB >> 21833689 |
Parya Saberi1, Mallory O Johnson, Charles E McCulloch, Eric Vittinghoff, Torsten B Neilands.
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to explore more comprehensive methods to analyze antiretroviral non-adherence data. Using illustrative data and simulations, we investigated the value of using binary logistic regression (LR; dichotomized at 0% non-adherence) versus a hurdle model (combination of LR plus generalized linear model for >0% non-adherence) versus a zero-inflated negative binomial (ZINB) model (simultaneously modeling 0% non-adherence and >0% non-adherence). In simulation studies, the hurdle and ZINB models had similar power but both had higher power in comparison to LR alone. The hurdle model had higher power than ZINB in settings where covariate effects were restricted to one or the other part of the model (0% non-adherence or degree of non-adherence). Use of the hurdle and ZINB models are powerful and valuable approaches in analyzing adherence data which yield a more complete picture than LR alone. We recommend adoption of this methodology for future antiretroviral adherence research.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21833689 PMCID: PMC3216469 DOI: 10.1007/s10461-011-9951-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: AIDS Behav ISSN: 1090-7165