Literature DB >> 21833646

The importance of willow thickets for ptarmigan and hares in shrub tundra: the more the better?

Dorothée Ehrich1, John-André Henden, Rolf Anker Ims, Lilyia O Doronina, Siw Turid Killengren, Nicolas Lecomte, Ivan G Pokrovsky, Gunnhild Skogstad, Alexander A Sokolov, Vasily A Sokolov, Nigel Gilles Yoccoz.   

Abstract

In patchy habitats, the relationship between animal abundance and cover of a preferred habitat may change with the availability of that habitat, resulting in a functional response in habitat use. Here, we investigate the relationship of two specialized herbivores, willow ptarmigan (Lagopus lagopus) and mountain hare (Lepus timidus), to willows (Salix spp.) in three regions of the shrub tundra zone-northern Norway, northern European Russia and western Siberia. Shrub tundra is a naturally patchy habitat where willow thickets represent a major structural element and are important for herbivores both as food and shelter. Habitat use was quantified using feces counts in a hierarchical spatial design and related to several measures of willow thicket configuration. We document a functional response in the use of willow thickets by ptarmigan, but not by hares. For hares, whose range extends into forested regions, occurrence increased overall with willow cover. The occurrence of willow ptarmigan showed a strong positive relationship to willow cover and a negative relationship to thicket fragmentation in the region with lowest willow cover at landscape scale, where willow growth may be limited by reindeer browsing. In regions with higher cover, in contrast, such relationships were not observed. Differences in predator communities among the regions may contribute to the observed pattern, enhancing the need for cover where willow thickets are scarce. Such region-specific relationships reflecting regional characteristics of the ecosystem highlight the importance of large-scale investigations to understand the relationships of habitat availability and use, which is a critical issue considering that habitat availability changes quickly with climate change and human impact.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21833646     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-011-2059-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  4 in total

1.  Climate change. Increasing shrub abundance in the Arctic.

Authors:  M Sturm; C Racine; K Tape
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-05-31       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  The ten year cycle of the willow grouse of Lower Kolyma.

Authors:  A Andreev
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  High resilience in the Yamal-Nenets social-ecological system, West Siberian Arctic, Russia.

Authors:  Bruce C Forbes; Florian Stammler; Timo Kumpula; Nina Meschtyb; Anu Pajunen; Elina Kaarlejärvi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-12-10       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Opposing plant community responses to warming with and without herbivores.

Authors:  Eric Post; Christian Pedersen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-08-21       Impact factor: 11.205

  4 in total
  8 in total

1.  Spatiotemporally variable snow properties drive habitat use of an Arctic mesopredator.

Authors:  Thomas W Glass; Greg A Breed; Glen E Liston; Adele K Reinking; Martin D Robards; Knut Kielland
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  A greener Greenland? Climatic potential and long-term constraints on future expansions of trees and shrubs.

Authors:  Signe Normand; Christophe Randin; Ralf Ohlemüller; Christian Bay; Toke T Høye; Erik D Kjær; Christian Körner; Heike Lischke; Luigi Maiorano; Jens Paulsen; Peter B Pearman; Achilleas Psomas; Urs A Treier; Niklaus E Zimmermann; Jens-Christian Svenning
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-07-08       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Indirect food web interactions mediated by predator-rodent dynamics: relative roles of lemmings and voles.

Authors:  Rolf A Ims; John-André Henden; Anders V Thingnes; Siw T Killengreen
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2013-10-30       Impact factor: 3.703

4.  Why Do the Boreal Forest Ecosystems of Northwestern Europe Differ from Those of Western North America?

Authors:  Rudy Boonstra; Harry P Andreassen; Stan Boutin; Jan Hušek; Rolf A Ims; Charles J Krebs; Christina Skarpe; Petter Wabakken
Journal:  Bioscience       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 8.589

5.  Vole abundance and reindeer carcasses determine breeding activity of Arctic foxes in low Arctic Yamal, Russia.

Authors:  Dorothee Ehrich; Maite Cerezo; Anna Y Rodnikova; Natalya A Sokolova; Eva Fuglei; Victor G Shtro; Aleksandr A Sokolov
Journal:  BMC Ecol       Date:  2017-09-16       Impact factor: 2.964

6.  How spatial variation in areal extent and configuration of labile vegetation states affect the riparian bird community in Arctic tundra.

Authors:  John-André Henden; Nigel G Yoccoz; Rolf A Ims; Knut Langeland
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-14       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Quantifying suitable late summer brood habitats for willow ptarmigan in Norway.

Authors:  Mikkel Andreas Jørnsøn Kvasnes; Hans Christian Pedersen; Erlend Birkeland Nilsen
Journal:  BMC Ecol       Date:  2018-10-03       Impact factor: 2.964

8.  Experimental herbivore exclusion, shrub introduction, and carbon sequestration in alpine plant communities.

Authors:  Mia Vedel Sørensen; Bente Jessen Graae; Dagmar Hagen; Brian J Enquist; Kristin Odden Nystuen; Richard Strimbeck
Journal:  BMC Ecol       Date:  2018-08-30       Impact factor: 2.964

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.