UNLABELLED: Small terminal or interstitial deletions involving bands 4q34 and 4q35 have been described in several patients with a relatively mild phenotype such as mild to moderate intellectual disability and minor dysmorphic features. We present a boy born from unrelated parents with a de novo 4q34.1-q35.2 deletion and clinical features resembling 22q11.2 deletion syndrome. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first reported patient with 4q34-q35 deletion and phenotype resembling 22q11.2 deletion syndrome without fifth finger anomalies as a specific feature of 4q- syndrome. G-banding karyotyping disclosed the deletion, which was further delineated by microarray comparative genomic hybridization. Fluorescence in situ hybridization and multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification analyses did not reveal rearrangements of 22q11.2 region. MLPA confirmed the deletion within the 4q35.2 region. CONCLUSION: Given the considerable clinical overlaps between the 22q11.2 deletion syndrome and clinical manifestation of the patient described in this study, we propose that region 4q34.1-q35.2 should be considered as another region associated with phenotype resembling 22q11.2 deletion syndrome. We also propose that distal 4q deletions should be considered in the evaluation of patients with phenotypic manifestations resembling 22q11.2 deletion syndrome in whom no 22q11.2 microdeletion was detected, even in the absence of distinctive fifth finger anomalies. Additionally, we underline the importance of applying array CGH that enables simultaneous genome-wide detection and delineation of copy number changes (e.g., deletions and duplications).
UNLABELLED: Small terminal or interstitial deletions involving bands 4q34 and 4q35 have been described in several patients with a relatively mild phenotype such as mild to moderate intellectual disability and minor dysmorphic features. We present a boy born from unrelated parents with a de novo 4q34.1-q35.2 deletion and clinical features resembling 22q11.2 deletion syndrome. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first reported patient with 4q34-q35 deletion and phenotype resembling 22q11.2 deletion syndrome without fifth finger anomalies as a specific feature of 4q- syndrome. G-banding karyotyping disclosed the deletion, which was further delineated by microarray comparative genomic hybridization. Fluorescence in situ hybridization and multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification analyses did not reveal rearrangements of 22q11.2 region. MLPA confirmed the deletion within the 4q35.2 region. CONCLUSION: Given the considerable clinical overlaps between the 22q11.2 deletion syndrome and clinical manifestation of the patient described in this study, we propose that region 4q34.1-q35.2 should be considered as another region associated with phenotype resembling 22q11.2 deletion syndrome. We also propose that distal 4q deletions should be considered in the evaluation of patients with phenotypic manifestations resembling 22q11.2 deletion syndrome in whom no 22q11.2 microdeletion was detected, even in the absence of distinctive fifth finger anomalies. Additionally, we underline the importance of applying array CGH that enables simultaneous genome-wide detection and delineation of copy number changes (e.g., deletions and duplications).
Authors: S Cingoz; A M Bisgaard; I Bache; T Bryndorf; M Kirchoff; W Petersen; H-H Ropers; N Maas; G Van Buggenhout; N Tommerup; Z Tümer Journal: Am J Med Genet A Date: 2006-10-15 Impact factor: 2.802
Authors: Ladeana W Hillier; Tina A Graves; Robert S Fulton; Lucinda A Fulton; Kymberlie H Pepin; Patrick Minx; Caryn Wagner-McPherson; Dan Layman; Kristine Wylie; Mandeep Sekhon; Michael C Becker; Ginger A Fewell; Kimberly D Delehaunty; Tracie L Miner; William E Nash; Colin Kremitzki; Lachlan Oddy; Hui Du; Hui Sun; Holland Bradshaw-Cordum; Johar Ali; Jason Carter; Matt Cordes; Anthony Harris; Amber Isak; Andrew van Brunt; Christine Nguyen; Feiyu Du; Laura Courtney; Joelle Kalicki; Philip Ozersky; Scott Abbott; Jon Armstrong; Edward A Belter; Lauren Caruso; Maria Cedroni; Marc Cotton; Teresa Davidson; Anu Desai; Glendoria Elliott; Thomas Erb; Catrina Fronick; Tony Gaige; William Haakenson; Krista Haglund; Andrea Holmes; Richard Harkins; Kyung Kim; Scott S Kruchowski; Cynthia Madsen Strong; Neenu Grewal; Ernest Goyea; Shunfang Hou; Andrew Levy; Scott Martinka; Kelly Mead; Michael D McLellan; Rick Meyer; Jennifer Randall-Maher; Chad Tomlinson; Sara Dauphin-Kohlberg; Amy Kozlowicz-Reilly; Neha Shah; Sharhonda Swearengen-Shahid; Jacqueline Snider; Joseph T Strong; Johanna Thompson; Martin Yoakum; Shawn Leonard; Charlene Pearman; Lee Trani; Maxim Radionenko; Jason E Waligorski; Chunyan Wang; Susan M Rock; Aye-Mon Tin-Wollam; Rachel Maupin; Phil Latreille; Michael C Wendl; Shiaw-Pyng Yang; Craig Pohl; John W Wallis; John Spieth; Tamberlyn A Bieri; Nicolas Berkowicz; Joanne O Nelson; John Osborne; Li Ding; Rekha Meyer; Aniko Sabo; Yoram Shotland; Prashant Sinha; Patricia E Wohldmann; Lisa L Cook; Matthew T Hickenbotham; James Eldred; Donald Williams; Thomas A Jones; Xinwei She; Francesca D Ciccarelli; Elisa Izaurralde; James Taylor; Jeremy Schmutz; Richard M Myers; David R Cox; Xiaoqiu Huang; John D McPherson; Elaine R Mardis; Sandra W Clifton; Wesley C Warren; Asif T Chinwalla; Sean R Eddy; Marco A Marra; Ivan Ovcharenko; Terrence S Furey; Webb Miller; Evan E Eichler; Peer Bork; Mikita Suyama; David Torrents; Robert H Waterston; Richard K Wilson Journal: Nature Date: 2005-04-07 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Karen Buysse; Barbara Delle Chiaie; Rudy Van Coster; Bart Loeys; Anne De Paepe; Geert Mortier; Frank Speleman; Björn Menten Journal: Eur J Med Genet Date: 2009-09-16 Impact factor: 2.708
Authors: Michael R Rossi; Miriam S DiMaio; Bixia Xiang; Kangmo Lu; Hande Kaymakcalan; Margretta Seashore; Maurice J Mahoney; Peining Li Journal: Am J Med Genet A Date: 2009-12 Impact factor: 2.802
Authors: Kiran Kumar Mantripragada; Isabel Tapia-Páez; Elisabeth Blennow; Peter Nilsson; Anna Wedell; Jan P Dumanski Journal: Int J Mol Med Date: 2004-02 Impact factor: 4.101
Authors: Wilson Wai Sing Chong; Ivan Fai Man Lo; Stephen Tak Sum Lam; Chi Chiu Wang; Ho Ming Luk; Tak Yeung Leung; Kwong Wai Choy Journal: Mol Cytogenet Date: 2014-05-23 Impact factor: 2.009