Literature DB >> 21833000

Long-term effects of candesartan and amlodipine on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in Japanese high-risk hypertensive patients: the Candesartan Antihypertensive Survival Evaluation in Japan Extension Study (CASE-J Ex).

Toshio Ogihara1, Kenji Ueshima, Kazuwa Nakao, Kohshiro Fukiyama, Koji Oba, Shinji Yasuno, Akira Fujimoto, Tosiya Sato, Hiroaki Matsuoka, Takao Saruta.   

Abstract

In the Candesartan Antihypertensive Survival Evaluation in Japan (CASE-J) trial, comparable efficacy was noted between candesartan and amlodipine in the incidence of cardiovascular (CV) morbidity and mortality during 3.2 years of follow up. Candesartan suppressed new-onset diabetes more effectively than amlodipine. In this observational study, we investigated whether or not the efficacy of the two drugs is sustainable for another 3 years beyond the experimental period of the CASE-J trial. Of the 4728 high-risk hypertensive patients initially enrolled in the CASE-J trial, 2232 agreed to further follow up. The primary endpoint was a composite of CV morbidity and mortality. The distribution of demographic characteristics for the 2232 patients in the CASE-J extension was similar to that in the initial 4703 patients in the CASE-J trial. Both drugs controlled blood pressure well over the relatively long period of time. The incidence of CV events was 15.5/1000 patient years in the candesartan group and 16.3/1000 patient years in the amlodipine group (Hazard ratio (HR)=0.95, 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.77-1.18; P=0.650). The incidence of new-onset diabetes was significantly lower in the candesartan group (9.5/1000 patient years) than in the amlodipine group (13.3/1000 patient years), representing a 29% risk reduction for new-onset diabetes (HR=0.71, 95% CI=0.51-1.00, P=0.0495). In conclusion, candesartan and amlodipine showed comparable efficacy against CV events beyond the experimental period of the CASE-J trial in high-risk hypertensive patients. In addition, the effects of candesartan on new-onset diabetes observed during the CASE-J trial were sustained in the CASE-J extension. The CASE-J extension, which covered a 3-year extension of follow-up from the original trial, corroborated the results of the CASE-J trial.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21833000     DOI: 10.1038/hr.2011.120

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hypertens Res        ISSN: 0916-9636            Impact factor:   3.872


  4 in total

Review 1.  Calcium channel blockers versus other classes of drugs for hypertension.

Authors:  Jiaying Zhu; Ning Chen; Muke Zhou; Jian Guo; Cairong Zhu; Jie Zhou; Mengmeng Ma; Li He
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-01-09

Review 2.  Calcium channel blockers versus other classes of drugs for hypertension.

Authors:  Jiaying Zhu; Ning Chen; Muke Zhou; Jian Guo; Cairong Zhu; Jie Zhou; Mengmeng Ma; Li He
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-10-17

3.  Comparison between calcium channel blocker with angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker combination on the development of new-onset diabetes in hypertensive Korean patients.

Authors:  Yong Hoon Kim; Ae-Young Her; Seung-Woon Rha; Byoung Geol Choi; Se Yeon Choi; Jae Kyeong Byun; Dong Oh Kang; Won Young Jang; Woohyeun Kim; Ju Yeol Baek; Woong Gil Choi; Tae Soo Kang; Jihun Ahn; Sang-Ho Park; Sung Hun Park; Ji Yeon Hong; Ji Young Park; Min-Ho Lee; Cheol Ung Choi; Chang Gyu Park; Hong Seog Seo
Journal:  J Diabetes Metab Disord       Date:  2020-04-03

Review 4.  Pancreatic stellate cells in the islets as a novel target to preserve the pancreatic β-cell mass and function.

Authors:  Yeoree Yang; Ji-Won Kim; Heon-Seok Park; Eun-Young Lee; Kun-Ho Yoon
Journal:  J Diabetes Investig       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 4.232

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.