Literature DB >> 21832812

Comparison of coil designs for peripheral magnetic muscle stimulation.

S M Goetz1, H-G Herzog, N Gattinger, B Gleich.   

Abstract

The recent application of magnetic stimulation in rehabilitation is often said to solve key drawbacks of the established electrical method. Magnetic fields cause less pain, allow principally a better penetration of inhomogeneous biologic tissue and do not require skin contact. However, in most studies the evoked muscle force has been disappointing. In this paper, a comparison of a classical round circular geometry, a commercial muscle-stimulation coil and a novel design is presented, with special emphasis on the physical field properties. These systems show markedly different force responses for the same magnetic energy and highlight the enormous potential of different coil geometries. The new design resulted in a slope of the force recruiting curve being more than two and a half times higher than the other coils. The data were analyzed with respect to the underlying physical causes and field conditions. After a parameter-extraction approach, the results for the three coils span a two-dimensional space with clearly distinguishable degrees of freedom, which can be manipulated nearly separately and reflect the two main features of a field; the peak amplitude and its decay with the distance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21832812     DOI: 10.1088/1741-2560/8/5/056007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neural Eng        ISSN: 1741-2552            Impact factor:   5.379


  4 in total

Review 1.  The development and modelling of devices and paradigms for transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Stefan M Goetz; Zhi-De Deng
Journal:  Int Rev Psychiatry       Date:  2017-04-26

2.  Prediction of Force Recruitment of Neuromuscular Magnetic Stimulation From 3D Field Model of the Thigh.

Authors:  Stefan Goetz; Joerg Kammermann; Florian Helling; Thomas Weyh; Zhongxi Li
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 4.528

3.  Checklist on the Quality of the Repetitive Peripheral Magnetic Stimulation (rPMS) Methods in Research: An International Delphi Study.

Authors:  Cyril Schneider; Andrea Zangrandi; Nico Sollmann; Michaela Veronika Bonfert; Louis-David Beaulieu
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-03-22       Impact factor: 4.003

4.  Analysis and optimization of pulse dynamics for magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Stefan M Goetz; Cong Nam Truong; Manuel G Gerhofer; Angel V Peterchev; Hans-Georg Herzog; Thomas Weyh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.