Literature DB >> 21831966

Patients' evaluations of European general practice--revisited after 11 years.

Davorina Petek1, Beat Künzi, Janko Kersnik, Joachim Szecsenyi, Michel Wensing.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the last decade many things have changed in healthcare systems, primary care practices and populations.
OBJECTIVE: To describe evaluations of general practice care by patients with a chronic illness in 2009 and compare these with a previous study done in 1998.
DESIGN: A descriptive analysis of patients' evaluations, using data from the European practice assessment Cardio study on cardiovascular patients in eight European countries in 2009. We compared these evaluations with a subgroup of patients with self-defined chronic illness from the study in 1998, using a linear regression model. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Patients' evaluation of general practice using the EUROPEP questionnaire. The EUROPEP is a 23-item validated measure of patient evaluations of general practice care.
RESULTS: In 2009, 7472 patients from 251 practices participated in the study with an overall response rate of 49.6%. The percentage of patients with positive evaluations (good/excellent) was 80% or higher for all items, except for the waiting time. More positive evaluations were found in older patients, patients with a longer attachment to the practice, patients with a higher self-evaluation of their health, patients with fewer mental health problems and less pain/discomfort. The comparison between 1998 and 2009 showed no overall trends for all countries combined. Whereas English patients became fairly more positive about general practice in 2009, German patients became slightly less positive, although still more positive than English patients.
CONCLUSION: Overall, the patients' evaluations of general practice were very positive in family practice care in the years 1998 and 2009. The trends over the years need to be carefully interpreted over time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21831966     DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzr052

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care        ISSN: 1353-4505            Impact factor:   2.038


  12 in total

1.  Patient experience and the role of postgraduate GP training: a cross-sectional analysis of national Patient Survey data in England.

Authors:  Mark Ashworth; Peter Schofield; Stevo Durbaba; Sanjiv Ahluwalia
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Are family practice trainers and their host practices any better? Comparing practice trainers and non-trainers and their practices.

Authors:  Pieter van den Hombergh; Saskia Schalk-Soekar; Anneke Kramer; Ben Bottema; Stephen Campbell; Jozé Braspenning
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 2.497

3.  A cross-sectional study of socio-demographic factors associated with patient access to primary care in Slovenia.

Authors:  Suzana Kert; Igor Švab; Maja Sever; Irena Makivić; Danica Rotar Pavlič
Journal:  Int J Equity Health       Date:  2015-04-21

4.  A randomised controlled trial to improve the role of the general practitioner in cancer rehabilitation: effect on patients' satisfaction with their general practitioners.

Authors:  Stinne Holm Bergholdt; Dorte Gilså Hansen; Pia Veldt Larsen; Jakob Kragstrup; Jens Søndergaard
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Patient Safety Culture in Slovenian out-of-hours Primary Care Clinics.

Authors:  Zalika Klemenc-Ketiš; Ellen Tveter Deilkås; Dag Hofoss; Gunnar Tschudi Bondevik
Journal:  Zdr Varst       Date:  2017-10-09

Review 6.  Patient Satisfaction with Pre-Hospital Emergency Services. A Qualitative Study Comparing Professionals' and Patients' Views.

Authors:  Fernando García-Alfranca; Anna Puig; Carles Galup; Hortensia Aguado; Ismael Cerdá; Mercedes Guilabert; Virtudes Pérez-Jover; Irene Carrillo; José Joaquín Mira
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-01-30       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  The EUROPEP questionnaire for patient's evaluation of general practice care: Bulgarian experience.

Authors:  Rositsa Dimova; Rumyana Stoyanova; Donka Keskinova
Journal:  Croat Med J       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 1.351

8.  Do family physicians advise younger people on cardiovascular disease prevention? A cross-sectional study from Slovenia.

Authors:  Davorina Petek; Rok Platinovsek; Zalika Klemenc-Ketis; Janko Kersnik
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2013-06-14       Impact factor: 2.497

9.  How do patients with a Turkish background evaluate their medical care in Germany? An observational study in primary care.

Authors:  Katja Goetz; Jessica Bungartz; Joachim Szecsenyi; Jost Steinhaeuser
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2015-11-03       Impact factor: 2.711

10.  Patient experiences with family medicine: a longitudinal study after the Dutch health care reforms in 2006.

Authors:  Pieter van den Hombergh; Arna van Doorn-Klomberg; Stephen Campbell; Michel Wensing; Jozé Braspenning
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 2.497

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.