Literature DB >> 21831888

Challenges of ecological monitoring: estimating population abundance from sparse trap counts.

Natalia Petrovskaya1, Sergei Petrovskii, Archie K Murchie.   

Abstract

Ecological monitoring aims to provide estimates of pest species abundance-this information being then used for making decisions about means of control. For invertebrate species, population size estimates are often based on trap counts which provide the value of the population density at the traps' location. However, the use of traps in large numbers is problematic as it is costly and may also be disruptive to agricultural procedures. Therefore, the challenge is to obtain a reliable population size estimate from sparse spatial data. The approach we develop in this paper is based on the ideas of numerical integration on a coarse grid. We investigate several methods of numerical integration in order to understand how badly the lack of spatial data can affect the accuracy of results. We first test our approach on simulation data mimicking spatial population distributions of different complexity. We show that, rather counterintuitively, a robust estimate of the population size can be obtained from just a few traps, even when the population distribution has a highly complicated spatial structure. We obtain an estimate of the minimum number of traps required to calculate the population size with good accuracy. We then apply our approach to field data to confirm that the number of trap/sampling locations can be much fewer than has been used in many monitoring programmes. We also show that the accuracy of our approach is greater that that of the statistical method commonly used in field studies. Finally, we discuss the implications of our findings for ecological monitoring practice and show that the use of trap numbers 'smaller than minimum' may still be possible but it would result in a paradigm shift: the population size estimates should be treated probabilistically and the arising uncertainty may introduce additional risk in decision-making.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21831888      PMCID: PMC3262429          DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2011.0386

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Soc Interface        ISSN: 1742-5662            Impact factor:   4.118


  6 in total

1.  Ecology. Fall and rise of the Black Sea ecosystem.

Authors:  Ahmet E Kideys
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-08-30       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 2.  Periodic travelling waves in cyclic populations: field studies and reaction-diffusion models.

Authors:  Jonathan A Sherratt; Matthew J Smith
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2008-05-06       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  A new index of aggregation for animal counts.

Authors:  J N Perry; M Hewitt
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Effective attraction radius : A method for comparing species attractants and determining densities of flying insects.

Authors:  J A Byers; O Anderbrant; J Löqvist
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 2.626

Review 5.  Dynamical aspects of animal grouping: swarms, schools, flocks, and herds.

Authors:  A Okubo
Journal:  Adv Biophys       Date:  1986

6.  Ecological chaos in the wake of invasion.

Authors:  J A Sherratt; M A Lewis; A C Fowler
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1995-03-28       Impact factor: 11.205

  6 in total
  5 in total

1.  Catching ghosts with a coarse net: use and abuse of spatial sampling data in detecting synchronization.

Authors:  Natalia Petrovskaya; Sergei Petrovskii
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Computational ecology as an emerging science.

Authors:  Sergei Petrovskii; Natalia Petrovskaya
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2012-01-05       Impact factor: 3.906

3.  Towards the Development of a More Accurate Monitoring Procedure for Invertebrate Populations, in the Presence of an Unknown Spatial Pattern of Population Distribution in the Field.

Authors:  Natalia B Petrovskaya; Emily Forbes; Sergei V Petrovskii; Keith F A Walters
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 2.769

4.  Using Probabilistic Approach to Evaluate the Total Population Density on Coarse Grids.

Authors:  Manal Alqhtani; Khaled M Saad
Journal:  Entropy (Basel)       Date:  2020-06-14       Impact factor: 2.524

5.  A predictive model and a field study on heterogeneous slug distribution in arable fields arising from density dependent movement.

Authors:  Sergei Petrovskii; John Ellis; Emily Forbes; Natalia Petrovskaya; Keith F A Walters
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.