Literature DB >> 21831539

Comparative pathogenicity of type 1 and type 2 isolates of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) in a young pig infection model.

F J Martínez-Lobo1, F Díez-Fuertes, J Segalés, C García-Artiga, I Simarro, J M Castro, C Prieto.   

Abstract

Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) isolates are classified in two different genotypes, based on genomic heterogeneity: type 1, which comprises European type isolates, and type 2, which includes North American type isolates. It is believed that members of both genotypes differ in some biological properties including pathogenicity, however extensive studies comparing isolates of both genotypes have never been carried out. The objective of the present study was to compare the pathogenic properties of six different PRRSV isolates, three of type 1 and three of type 2, in a young pig infection model. For this purpose, a total of 105 3-week-old piglets were divided in 7 groups of 15 animals that were exposed on day 0 of the experiment to one of the six isolates tested or were mock infected (negative control group). Clinical signs and rectal temperatures were recorded daily and blood samples were taken on days 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18 and 21 of the experiment. On days 7, 14 and 21 post-inoculation five animals per group were sacrificed, macroscopic lung lesions were evaluated and different tissue samples were collected to determine viral organic distribution. The results obtained indicate that type 2 isolates are more pneumovirulent than type 1 isolates, as demonstrated by the recording of respiratory clinical signs only in pigs exposed to type 2 viruses and by the severity of macroscopic and microscopic lung lesions in those pigs. However, no clear differences could be established between genotypes in systemic clinical signs or viral load and viral distribution after challenge. These results support the general idea that type 2 isolates induce more severe respiratory disease than type 1 isolates.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21831539     DOI: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2011.06.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet Microbiol        ISSN: 0378-1135            Impact factor:   3.293


  30 in total

1.  Insights into the Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus Viral Ovarian Tumor Domain Protease Specificity for Ubiquitin and Interferon Stimulated Gene Product 15.

Authors:  Stephanie M Bester; Courtney M Daczkowski; Kay S Faaberg; Scott D Pegan
Journal:  ACS Infect Dis       Date:  2018-06-12       Impact factor: 5.084

2.  Pathogenesis of type 1 (European genotype) porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus in male gonads of infected boar.

Authors:  K Han; H W Seo; Y Oh; I Kang; C Park; J H Han; S-H Kim; C Chae
Journal:  Vet Res Commun       Date:  2013-02-24       Impact factor: 2.459

3.  Coinfection with Entamoeba polecki and Brachyspira hyodysenteriae in a pig with severe diarrhea.

Authors:  Maria Cuvertoret-Sanz; Christiane Weissenbacher-Lang; Madeleine Lunardi; René Brunthaler; Mònica Coma; Herbert Weissenböck; Joaquim Segalés
Journal:  J Vet Diagn Invest       Date:  2019-02-09       Impact factor: 1.279

4.  Analysis of efficacy obtained with a trivalent inactivated Haemophilus parasuis serovars 4, 5, and 12 vaccine and commercial vaccines against Glässer's disease in piglets.

Authors:  Zhanqin Zhao; Huisheng Liu; Yun Xue; Kunpeng Chen; Zhijun Liu; Qiao Xue; Chen Wang
Journal:  Can J Vet Res       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 1.310

5.  Comparison of Two Commercial Type 1 Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus (PRRSV) Modified Live Vaccines against Heterologous Type 1 and Type 2 PRRSV Challenge in Growing Pigs.

Authors:  Taeyeon Kim; Changhoon Park; Kyuhyung Choi; Jiwoon Jeong; Ikjae Kang; Su-Jin Park; Chanhee Chae
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2015-04-08

6.  Comparison of the pathogenicity of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV)-1 and PRRSV-2 in pregnant sows.

Authors:  Chang-Gi Jeong; Salik Nazki; Seung-Chai Kim; Amina Khatun; Yun-Hee Noh; Dong-Uk Lee; Sang Chul Kang; Byoung-Joo Seo; Myeon-Sik Yang; Sim-In Lee; In-Joong Yoon; Bumseok Kim; Won-Il Kim
Journal:  Arch Virol       Date:  2022-01-26       Impact factor: 2.574

7.  The Attenuation Phenotype of a Ribavirin-Resistant Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus Is Maintained during Sequential Passages in Pigs.

Authors:  Amina Khatun; Nadeem Shabir; Byoung-Joo Seo; Bum-Seok Kim; Kyoung-Jin Yoon; Won-Il Kim
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2016-04-14       Impact factor: 5.103

8.  Comparative pathogenesis of type 1 (European genotype) and type 2 (North American genotype) porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus in infected boar.

Authors:  Kiwon Han; Hwi Won Seo; Changhoon Park; Yeonsu Oh; Ikjae Kang; Chanhee Chae
Journal:  Virol J       Date:  2013-05-21       Impact factor: 4.099

9.  Kinetics of the porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) humoral immune response in swine serum and oral fluids collected from individual boars.

Authors:  Apisit Kittawornrat; Mark Engle; Yaowalak Panyasing; Chris Olsen; Kent Schwartz; Anna Rice; Sergio Lizano; Chong Wang; Jeffrey Zimmerman
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2013-03-28       Impact factor: 2.741

10.  Safety of Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Modified Live Virus (MLV) vaccine strains in a young pig infection model.

Authors:  Francisco Javier Martínez-Lobo; Laura Carrascosa de Lome; Francisco Díez-Fuertes; Joaquim Segalés; Carlos García-Artiga; Isabel Simarro; José María Castro; Cinta Prieto
Journal:  Vet Res       Date:  2013-12-05       Impact factor: 3.683

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.