Literature DB >> 21831458

Outcome of children with edge-everted traumatic tympanic membrane perforations following spontaneous healing versus fibroblast growth factor-containing gelfoam patching with or without edge repair.

Zhengcai Lou1, Lianfang Xu, Jian Yang, Xiaohong Wu.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To retrospectively analyze the outcome of children with edge-everted tympanic membrane (TM) perforations following spontaneous healing and fibroblast growth factor-containing gelfoam patching with or without repair of the edge flaps.
METHODS: Medical records of children with TM perforations who underwent spontaneous healing (n = 69) or received fibroblast growth factor (FGF)-containing gelfoam patching treatment (n = 67) were retrieved from the Records Department of the Wenzhou Medical College-Affiliated Yiwu Hospital in China. The demographic data and outcome measures were analyzed and compared between these two groups of patients.
RESULTS: Patching with FGF-containing gelfoams significantly improved the healing rate (P < 0.01) and the average perforation closure time (P<0.01), as compared with spontaneous healing. Repair of the perforation edge flaps did not significantly affect the outcome of gelfoam patching (P>0.05), despite a slightly reduced healing rate (96.4% versus 100%) and a slightly shorter closure time (10.2 ± 2.6 d versus 10.9 ± 3.3 d) observed as compared with no edge repair. The everted perforation edge flaps formed scabs during the process of spontaneous healing whereas they underwent retraction and eventually dissolved during the process of gelfoam patching-facilitated healing.
CONCLUSIONS: As compared with spontaneous healing, FGF-containing gelfoam patching had an improved outcome in children with edge-everted traumatic eardrum perforation. Repair of everted edge flaps did not affect the healing outcome. Our results suggest that growth factor-containing gelfoam patching without eardrum flap repair would offer a feasible option to manage traumatic tympanic membrane perforations in children.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21831458     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2011.07.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0165-5876            Impact factor:   1.675


  8 in total

1.  Regeneration of chronic tympanic membrane perforation using an EGF-releasing chitosan patch.

Authors:  Hoon Seonwoo; Seung Won Kim; Jangho Kim; Tian Chunjie; Ki Taek Lim; Yeon Ju Kim; Shambhavi Pandey; Pill-Hoon Choung; Yun-Hoon Choung; Jong Hoon Chung
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 3.845

2.  A prospective controlled trial comparing spontaneous closure and Epifilm® patching in traumatic tympanic membrane perforations.

Authors:  Ibrahim Sayin; Kamil Hakan Kaya; Oğuzhan Ekizoğlu; Ibrahim Erdim; Fatma Tülin Kayhan
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-01-05       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Topical Application of bFGF Alone for the Regeneration of Chronic Tympanic Membrane Perforations: A Preliminary Case Series.

Authors:  Zihan Lou; Zhengcai Lou; Kangfeng Jin; Junzhi Sun; Zhengnong Chen
Journal:  Stem Cells Int       Date:  2021-05-15       Impact factor: 5.443

4.  Epithelial pearl formation following tympanic membrane regeneration therapy using an atelocollagen/silicone membrane and basic fibroblast growth factor: our experience from a retrospective study of one hundred sixteen patients.

Authors:  N Hakuba; N Hato; Y Omotehara; M Okada; K Gyo
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 2.597

5.  Outlook for Tissue Engineering of the Tympanic Membrane.

Authors:  Maria A Villar-Fernandez; Jose A Lopez-Escamez
Journal:  Audiol Res       Date:  2015-01-23

6.  Treatment of tympanic membrane perforation using bacterial cellulose: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Fábio Coelho Alves Silveira; Flávia Cristina Morone Pinto; Sílvio da Silva Caldas Neto; Mariana de Carvalho Leal; Jéssica Cesário; José Lamartine de Andrade Aguiar
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-09-08

Review 7.  FGF2 and EGF for the Regeneration of Tympanic Membrane: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Zhengcai Lou; Zihan Lou; Yumeng Jiang; Zhengnong Chen
Journal:  Stem Cells Int       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 5.443

8.  The Effectiveness of bFGF in the Treatment of Tympanic Membrane Perforations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Juntao Huang; Bing Mei Teh; Robert Henry Eikelboom; Liyuan Han; Guodong Xu; Xu Yao; Yi Hu; Minghao Zheng; Yi Shen
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 2.619

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.