Literature DB >> 21831381

Analysis of peptides and proteins using sub-2 μm fully porous and sub 3-μm shell particles.

Aline Staub1, Daria Zurlino, Serge Rudaz, Jean-Luc Veuthey, Davy Guillarme.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the potential of sub-2 μm totally porous particles and sub-3 μm shell particles for peptide and protein analysis. Specific analytical strategies must be developed for these biomolecules as their importance in the pharmaceutical industry increases and as their structural complexity involves some issues when classical LC conditions are employed. Attention was paid on comparing these different columns in various LC conditions (different temperatures, gradient times, and mobile phase flow rates). The comparison of the different supports was assessed considering columns characteristics (quality of packing, silanol activity, pore size, totally porous or shell particles). In this article, peptides were first analyzed with both column technologies. Similar results to those achieved with low molecular weight compounds were obtained (peak capacity >100 for t(grad) around 3 min and columns dimensions of 2.1 mm id × 50 mm), but specific conditions were required (elevated temperature and the use of a volatile ion-pairing reagent, namely TFA). For peptide analysis following tryptic digestion, the goal was to improve peak capacity and resolution because of the large number of generated peptides. For this purpose, longer columns packed with porous sub-2 μm or shell sub-3 μm particles (i.e., 150 mm) and gradient times (i.e., up to 30 min) were tested. On the other hand, proteins in their intact forms have higher molecular weights (MW>5000 Da) and a tertiary structure, thus requiring different conditions in terms of stationary phase hydrophobicity (C(4)vs. C(18)) and pore size (300 vs. 120 Å). In addition, there were issues with adsorption onto the LC system and/or the column itself. This study showed that proteins with MWs lower than 40,000 Da required chromatographic conditions close to those employed for peptide analysis. For larger proteins, a C(4) 300 Å stationary phase gave the best results, confirming theoretical predictions.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21831381     DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2011.07.051

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chromatogr A        ISSN: 0021-9673            Impact factor:   4.759


  4 in total

Review 1.  Analysis of protein isoforms: can we do it better?

Authors:  Miroslava Stastna; Jennifer E Van Eyk
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 3.984

2.  Validation and application of sub-2 μm core-shell UHPLC-UV-ESI-Orbitrap MS for identification and quantification of β-carotene and selected cleavage products with preceding solid-phase extraction.

Authors:  G Martano; E Bojaxhi; I C Forstenlehner; C G Huber; N Bresgen; P M Eckl; H Stutz
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 4.142

3.  Reversed-phase fused-core HPLC modeling of peptides.

Authors:  Matthias D'Hondt; Bert Gevaert; Sofie Stalmans; Sylvia Van Dorpe; Evelien Wynendaele; Kathelijne Peremans; Christian Burvenich; Bart De Spiegeleer
Journal:  J Pharm Anal       Date:  2012-11-30

Review 4.  The crucial role of multiomic approach in cancer research and clinically relevant outcomes.

Authors:  Miaolong Lu; Xianquan Zhan
Journal:  EPMA J       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 6.543

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.