| Literature DB >> 21831291 |
Keo-Sik Kim1, Jeong-Hwan Seo, Chul-Gyu Song.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Radiological scoring methods such as colon transit time (CTT) have been widely used for the assessment of bowel motility. However, these radiograph-based methods need cumbersome radiological instruments and their frequent exposure to radiation. Therefore, a non-invasive estimation algorithm of bowel motility, based on a back-propagation neural network (BPNN) model of bowel sounds (BS) obtained by an auscultation, was devised.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21831291 PMCID: PMC3170631 DOI: 10.1186/1475-925X-10-69
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Eng Online ISSN: 1475-925X Impact factor: 2.819
Figure 1Sensor-adaptation set-up of noncontact-type probe.
Figure 2Procedure used for the estimation of the colon transit time (CTT) using the jitter and shimmer of bowel sounds.
Correlation coefficients (C.C.) between the selected features and measured colon transit time (CTT) and their p-values
| J1, 3 | S1, 2 | S3, 2 | J3.3 | S2, 2 | S2, 1 | CTT | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.154 | 37.6 | 36.1 | 0.159 | 35.1 | 35.4 | 10.8 | |
| 0.172 | 34.4 | 34.2 | 0.167 | 35.4 | 35.6 | 26.4 | |
| 0.176 | 38.3 | 36.6 | 0.177 | 38.2 | 37.0 | 10.8 | |
| 0.173 | 34.7 | 32.4 | 0.166 | 35.1 | 33.8 | 2.4 | |
| 0.162 | 34.6 | 36.8 | 0.155 | 36.3 | 38.3 | 18.0 | |
| 0.164 | 34.6 | 34.1 | 0.168 | 35.2 | 35.0 | 12.0 | |
| 0.160 | 37.1 | 36.5 | 0.164 | 34.7 | 35.2 | 16.8 | |
| 0.161 | 34.5 | 35.0 | 0.164 | 35.7 | 37.5 | 60.0 | |
| 0.157 | 36.2 | 33.8 | 0.168 | 35.4 | 37.3 | 26.4 | |
| 0.159 | 36.0 | 36.0 | 0.161 | 34.6 | 38.2 | 25.2 | |
| 0.167 | 35.0 | 36.7 | 0.165 | 34.3 | 36.4 | 2.4 | |
| 0.163 | 32.3 | 32.3 | 0.161 | 35.8 | 33.1 | 33.0 | |
| 0.132 | 30.2 | 31.1 | 0.151 | 30.1 | 29.8 | 69.0 | |
| 0.139 | 32.0 | 27.8 | 0.148 | 32.6 | 31.9 | 86.0 | |
| 0.147 | 31.8 | 30.6 | 0.154 | 31.7 | 32.4 | 102.0 | |
| 0.149 | 30.9 | 34.5 | 0.156 | 35.0 | 31.9 | 66.0 | |
| 0.134 | 32.5 | 30.8 | 0.142 | 30.7 | 30.5 | 82.2 | |
| 0.155 | 29.9 | 30.9 | 0.155 | 30.5 | 30.7 | 68.0 | |
| -0.79* | -0.76* | -0.75* | -0.74* | -0.72* | -0.68* | ||
N: normal subject, P: patient, Jch, t: jitter, Sch, t: shimmer, *: p < 0.01
Figure 3a) Raw bowel sound signals obtained from the abdomen. b) Inherent bowel sounds detected by the modified iterative kurtosis-based detector algorithm. c) Background noise. Arrows represent the individual bowel sound segments.
Figure 4Changes of the correlation coefficient (C.C.) and mean average error (MAE) of the testing-datasets according to the increase of the number of epoch.