Literature DB >> 21830693

Ecological forecasting and data assimilation in a data-rich era.

Yiqi Luo1, Kiona Ogle, Colin Tucker, Shenfeng Fei, Chao Gao, Shannon LaDeau, James S Clark, David S Schimel.   

Abstract

Several forces are converging to transform ecological research and increase its emphasis on quantitative forecasting. These forces include (1) dramatically increased volumes of data from observational and experimental networks, (2) increases in computational power, (3) advances in ecological models and related statistical and optimization methodologies, and most importantly, (4) societal needs to develop better strategies for natural resource management in a world of ongoing global change. Traditionally, ecological forecasting has been based on process-oriented models, informed by data in largely ad hoc ways. Although most ecological models incorporate some representation of mechanistic processes, today's models are generally not adequate to quantify real-world dynamics and provide reliable forecasts with accompanying estimates of uncertainty. A key tool to improve ecological forecasting and estimates of uncertainty is data assimilation (DA), which uses data to inform initial conditions and model parameters, thereby constraining a model during simulation to yield results that approximate reality as closely as possible. This paper discusses the meaning and history of DA in ecological research and highlights its role in refining inference and generating forecasts. DA can advance ecological forecasting by (1) improving estimates of model parameters and state variables, (2) facilitating selection of alternative model structures, and (3) quantifying uncertainties arising from observations, models, and their interactions. However, DA may not improve forecasts when ecological processes are not well understood or never observed. Overall, we suggest that DA is a key technique for converting raw data into ecologically meaningful products, which is especially important in this era of dramatically increased availability of data from observational and experimental networks.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21830693     DOI: 10.1890/09-1275.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Appl        ISSN: 1051-0761            Impact factor:   4.657


  25 in total

Review 1.  Climate, environmental and socio-economic change: weighing up the balance in vector-borne disease transmission.

Authors:  Paul E Parham; Joanna Waldock; George K Christophides; Deborah Hemming; Folashade Agusto; Katherine J Evans; Nina Fefferman; Holly Gaff; Abba Gumel; Shannon LaDeau; Suzanne Lenhart; Ronald E Mickens; Elena N Naumova; Richard S Ostfeld; Paul D Ready; Matthew B Thomas; Jorge Velasco-Hernandez; Edwin Michael
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2015-04-05       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Bayesian data assimilation provides rapid decision support for vector-borne diseases.

Authors:  Chris P Jewell; Richard G Brown
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2015-07-06       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  The emergent interactions that govern biodiversity change.

Authors:  James S Clark; C Lane Scher; Margaret Swift
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-07-06       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Climate controls over ecosystem metabolism: insights from a fifteen-year inductive artificial neural network synthesis for a subalpine forest.

Authors:  Loren P Albert; Trevor F Keenan; Sean P Burns; Travis E Huxman; Russell K Monson
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2017-03-25       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 5.  Plant functional types in Earth system models: past experiences and future directions for application of dynamic vegetation models in high-latitude ecosystems.

Authors:  Stan D Wullschleger; Howard E Epstein; Elgene O Box; Eugénie S Euskirchen; Santonu Goswami; Colleen M Iversen; Jens Kattge; Richard J Norby; Peter M van Bodegom; Xiaofeng Xu
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2014-05-02       Impact factor: 4.357

6.  Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework.

Authors:  Eric R Merriam; J Todd Petty; Michael P Strager
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2016-07-24       Impact factor: 1.355

7.  Modeling the Effects of Harvest Alternatives on Mitigating Oak Decline in a Central Hardwood Forest Landscape.

Authors:  Wen J Wang; Hong S He; Martin A Spetich; Stephen R Shifley; Frank R Thompson Iii; Jacob S Fraser
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-18       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Sequential modelling of the effects of mass drug treatments on anopheline-mediated lymphatic filariasis infection in Papua New Guinea.

Authors:  Brajendra K Singh; Moses J Bockarie; Manoj Gambhir; Peter M Siba; Daniel J Tisch; James Kazura; Edwin Michael
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-24       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Increased adoption of best practices in ecological forecasting enables comparisons of forecastability.

Authors:  Abigail S L Lewis; Whitney M Woelmer; Heather L Wander; Dexter W Howard; John W Smith; Ryan P McClure; Mary E Lofton; Nicholas W Hammond; Rachel S Corrigan; R Quinn Thomas; Cayelan C Carey
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2021-12-14       Impact factor: 6.105

10.  Automated data-intensive forecasting of plant phenology throughout the United States.

Authors:  Shawn D Taylor; Ethan P White
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2019-11-25       Impact factor: 6.105

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.