Literature DB >> 21830178

[Skin tests for diagnostics of allergic immediate-type reactions. Guideline of the German Society for Allergology and Clinical Immunology].

F Ruëff1, K-C Bergmann, K Brockow, T Fuchs, A Grübl, K Jung, L Klimek, H Müsken, O Pfaar, B Przybilla, H Sitter, W Wehrmann.   

Abstract

Skin tests in patients with IgE-mediated immediate type allergy are performed with the intention to establish a contact between allergens and skin mast cells. The latter carry specific IgE antibodies on their surface. If mast cells get activated, mediators (mainly histamine) are released which induce a visible skin reaction (wheal and erythema).[nl]Skin tests are indicated, if an immediate type allergic disease is suspected. Systemic anaphylactic reactions at skin testing are very rare. However, it is necessary to take them into account and to provide emergency treatment. Relative contraindications comprise skin diseases in the test area, poor general condition and insufficiently treated severe asthma. If tests are used, which have a higher risk for a systemic anaphylactic reaction, pregnancy or beta-blocker therapy, are further contraindications.[nl]Skin test application does not depend on patient age. However, in pre-school age tests are reluctantly performed. It is essential to consider the half-life of drugs which may interfere with the test result, and which have to be discontinued early enough before testing. After anaphylactic reactions there may be a refractory period. Therefore, tests should not be done within the first week after such reactions. Skin prick tests are the procedures of first choice, intradermal tests are more sensitive than prick tests. Skin tests are performed at the flexor side of the forearm. As intradermal tests are more inconvenient, testing can be also done at a less susceptible site of the body (upper back).[nl]It is recommended to use standardized test extracts. However, if standardised extracts are not available or do not yield suitable test results, one may switch to other preparations. If the patient shows a positive reaction to a non-standardized substance, control tests should be performed in healthy subjects in order to exclude an unspecific reaction.[nl]The reaction is read after 15 to 20 min. Skin tests are regarded positive if the mean wheal diameter is ≥ 3 mm at the prick test, and ≥ 5 mm at the intradermal test.[nl]Skin test results may be negative although patients are allergic. If a skin test is positive, one will have to distinguish reactions, which are clinically relevant, from those, which are not. History and/or challenge tests help to clarify the relevance of a sensitization. Usually, a clinically irrelevant sensitization does not lead to practical consequences. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21830178     DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1256476

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pneumologie        ISSN: 0934-8387


  18 in total

1.  Sensitization against Fungi in Patients with Airway Allergies over 20 Years in Germany.

Authors:  Susann Forkel; Caroline Beutner; Silke S Schröder; Oliver Bader; Sidhi Gupta; Thomas Fuchs; Michael P Schön; Johannes Geier; Timo Buhl
Journal:  Int Arch Allergy Immunol       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 2.749

2.  [A 25-year-old woman with widespread severely pruritic linear papules].

Authors:  V A Zampeli; G Nikolakis; C C Zouboulis; U Lippert
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 0.751

3.  Intracutaneous Skin Tests and Serum IgE Levels Cannot Predict the Grade of Anaphylaxis in Patients with Insect Venom Allergies.

Authors:  Moritz M Hollstein; Silke S Matzke; Lisa Lorbeer; Susann Forkel; Thomas Fuchs; Christiane Lex; Timo Buhl
Journal:  J Asthma Allergy       Date:  2022-07-07

4.  Does the principle of homologous groups allow a reduction of allergens in the skin prick test panel?

Authors:  Katharina Eder; Sabine Markmann; Donata Gellrich; Sophie-Louise Mann; Catalina Högerle; Moritz Gröger
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2020-08-07       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Occupational allergy to β-lactam antibiotics.

Authors:  Anna Classen; Thomas Fuchs
Journal:  Allergo J Int       Date:  2015-03-14

6.  The release of IL-31 and IL-13 after nasal allergen challenge and their relation to nasal symptoms.

Authors:  Ralf Baumann; Matthaeus Rabaszowski; Igor Stenin; Maria Gaertner-Akerboom; Kathrin Scheckenbach; Jens Wiltfang; Joerg Schipper; Martin Wagenmann
Journal:  Clin Transl Allergy       Date:  2012-08-01       Impact factor: 5.871

7.  The skin prick test - European standards.

Authors:  Lucie Heinzerling; Adriano Mari; Karl-Christian Bergmann; Megon Bresciani; Guido Burbach; Ulf Darsow; Stephen Durham; Wytske Fokkens; Mark Gjomarkaj; Tari Haahtela; Ana Todo Bom; Stefan Wöhrl; Howard Maibach; Richard Lockey
Journal:  Clin Transl Allergy       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 5.871

Review 8.  Recombinant allergen-based provocation testing.

Authors:  Verena Niederberger; Julia Eckl-Dorna; Gabrielle Pauli
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2013-08-03       Impact factor: 3.608

9.  Cutaneous Adverse Drug Reactions in Dogs Treated with Antiepileptic Drugs.

Authors:  Tina Koch; Ralf S Mueller; Britta Dobenecker; Andrea Fischer
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2016-04-14

10.  Clinical relevance is associated with allergen-specific wheal size in skin prick testing.

Authors:  T Haahtela; G J Burbach; C Bachert; C Bindslev-Jensen; S Bonini; J Bousquet; L Bousquet-Rouanet; P J Bousquet; M Bresciani; A Bruno; G W Canonica; U Darsow; P Demoly; S R Durham; W J Fokkens; S Giavi; M Gjomarkaj; C Gramiccioni; M L Kowalski; G Losonczy; M Orosz; N G Papadopoulos; G Stingl; A Todo-Bom; E von Mutius; A Köhli; S Wöhrl; S Järvenpää; H Kautiainen; L Petman; O Selroos; T Zuberbier; L M Heinzerling
Journal:  Clin Exp Allergy       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 5.018

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.