BACKGROUND: The roles played by different peach allergens with respect to symptom severity have not been completely ascertained. We have evaluated the diagnostic efficacy of peach recombinant allergens ImmunoCAP compared to peach in the identification of subjects at an increased risk for severe reactions to peaches. METHODS: 148 peach-allergic patients were divided based on their symptom severity into 2 groups: mild oral allergy syndrome (OAS) and severe OAS. Anti-rPru p 1, 3 and 4 IgE levels were measured. Statistical analyses were carried out using parametric and non-parametric tests. RESULTS: anti-rPru p 1 and anti-rPru p 4 IgE levels were significantly higher in patients with mild OAS than in patients with severe OAS (p = 0.0001); in contrast, anti-rPru p 3 IgE levels were significantly higher in patients with severe OAS than in patients with mild OAS (p < 0.00005). Moreover, we found that any unitary increase in anti-rPru p 1 IgE values corresponded to a 2.48% reduction in the odds of having severe OAS (p = 0.048), whereas any unitary increase in anti-rPru p 3 IgE values corresponded to a 9.02% increase in the probability of having severe OAS (p = 0.001). Unexpectedly, we found that patients positive to rPru p 3 as well as rPru p 1 and 4 demonstrated a significant reduction of the odds of developing severe symptoms than those positive to rPru p 3 alone. Anti-rPru p 3 IgE levels were a significantly better indicator than anti-peach IgE values (p = 0.016) of patients with the highest risk for severe OAS. A cutoff of 2.69 kUA/l for anti-rPru p 3 IgE values better discriminated peach-allergic patients at a higher risk for symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Italian patients with positive anti-rPru p 1, 4 and 3 IgE levels seemed less likely to experience the clinical effects of high anti-rPru p 3 IgE values.
BACKGROUND: The roles played by different peach allergens with respect to symptom severity have not been completely ascertained. We have evaluated the diagnostic efficacy of peach recombinant allergens ImmunoCAP compared to peach in the identification of subjects at an increased risk for severe reactions to peaches. METHODS: 148 peach-allergicpatients were divided based on their symptom severity into 2 groups: mild oral allergy syndrome (OAS) and severe OAS. Anti-rPru p 1, 3 and 4 IgE levels were measured. Statistical analyses were carried out using parametric and non-parametric tests. RESULTS: anti-rPru p 1 and anti-rPru p 4 IgE levels were significantly higher in patients with mild OAS than in patients with severe OAS (p = 0.0001); in contrast, anti-rPru p 3 IgE levels were significantly higher in patients with severe OAS than in patients with mild OAS (p < 0.00005). Moreover, we found that any unitary increase in anti-rPru p 1 IgE values corresponded to a 2.48% reduction in the odds of having severe OAS (p = 0.048), whereas any unitary increase in anti-rPru p 3 IgE values corresponded to a 9.02% increase in the probability of having severe OAS (p = 0.001). Unexpectedly, we found that patients positive to rPru p 3 as well as rPru p 1 and 4 demonstrated a significant reduction of the odds of developing severe symptoms than those positive to rPru p 3 alone. Anti-rPru p 3 IgE levels were a significantly better indicator than anti-peach IgE values (p = 0.016) of patients with the highest risk for severe OAS. A cutoff of 2.69 kUA/l for anti-rPru p 3 IgE values better discriminated peach-allergicpatients at a higher risk for symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Italian patients with positive anti-rPru p 1, 4 and 3 IgE levels seemed less likely to experience the clinical effects of high anti-rPru p 3 IgE values.
Authors: Margaretha A Faber; Ine I Decuyper; Athina L Van Gasse; Vito Sabato; Margo M Hagendorens; Didier G Ebo Journal: Curr Allergy Asthma Rep Date: 2018-10-25 Impact factor: 4.806
Authors: Carina G Uasuf; Caterina Di Sano; Sebastiano Gangemi; Giuseppe Albeggiani; Diego Cigna; Paola Dino; Ignazio Brusca; Mark Gjomarkaj; Elisabetta Pace Journal: Inflamm Res Date: 2018-05-17 Impact factor: 4.575
Authors: Isabel J Skypala; Ricardo Asero; Domingo Barber; Lorenzo Cecchi; Arazeli Diaz Perales; Karin Hoffmann-Sommergruber; Elide A Pastorello; Ines Swoboda; Joan Bartra; Didier G Ebo; Margaretha A Faber; Montserrat Fernández-Rivas; Francesca Gomez; Anastasios P Konstantinopoulos; Olga Luengo; Ronald van Ree; Enrico Scala; Stephen J Till Journal: Clin Transl Allergy Date: 2021-05-18 Impact factor: 5.871
Authors: Elisa Vendramin; Giorgio Pea; Luca Dondini; Igor Pacheco; Maria Teresa Dettori; Laura Gazza; Simone Scalabrin; Francesco Strozzi; Stefano Tartarini; Daniele Bassi; Ignazio Verde; Laura Rossini Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-03-03 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Francisca Gomez; Ana Aranda; Paloma Campo; Araceli Diaz-Perales; Natalia Blanca-Lopez; James Perkins; Maria Garrido; Miguel Blanca; Cristobalina Mayorga; Maria José Torres Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-09-11 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: C Alessandri; R Ferrara; M L Bernardi; D Zennaro; L Tuppo; I Giangrieco; M Tamburrini; A Mari; M A Ciardiello Journal: Clin Transl Allergy Date: 2017-07-17 Impact factor: 5.871