Literature DB >> 21828134

Molecular predictors of response to decitabine in advanced chronic myelomonocytic leukemia: a phase 2 trial.

Thorsten Braun1, Raphael Itzykson, Aline Renneville, Benoit de Renzis, François Dreyfus, Kamel Laribi, Krimo Bouabdallah, Norbert Vey, Andrea Toma, Christian Recher, Bruno Royer, Bertrand Joly, Anne Vekhoff, Ingrid Lafon, Laurence Sanhes, Guillaume Meurice, Cédric Oréar, Claude Preudhomme, Claude Gardin, Lionel Ades, Michaela Fontenay, Pierre Fenaux, Nathalie Droin, Eric Solary.   

Abstract

Hydroxyurea is the standard therapy of chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) presenting with advanced myeloproliferative and/or myelodysplastic features. Response to hypomethylating agents has been reported in heterogeneous series of CMML. We conducted a phase 2 trial of decitabine (DAC) in 39 patients with advanced CMML defined according to a previous trial. Median number of DAC cycles was 10 (range, 1-24). Overall response rate was 38% with 4 complete responses (10%), 8 marrow responses (21%), and 3 stable diseases with hematologic improvement (8%). Eighteen patients (46%) demonstrated stable disease without hematologic improvement, and 6 (15%) progressed to acute leukemia. With a median follow-up of 23 months, overall survival was 48% at 2 years. Mutations in ASXL1, TET2, AML1, NRAS, KRAS, CBL, FLT3, and janus kinase 2 (JAK2) genes, and hypermethylation of the promoter of the tumor suppressor gene TIF1γ, did not predict response or survival on DAC therapy. Lower CJUN and CMYB gene expression levels independently predicted improved overall survival. This trial confirmed DAC efficacy in approximately 40% of CMML patients with advanced myeloproliferative or myelodysplastic features and suggested that CJUN and CMYB expression could be potential biomarkers in this setting. This trial is registered at EudraCT (eudract.ema.europa.eu) as #2008-000470-21 and www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01098084.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21828134     DOI: 10.1182/blood-2011-05-352039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood        ISSN: 0006-4971            Impact factor:   22.113


  75 in total

Review 1.  Why methylation is not a marker predictive of response to hypomethylating agents.

Authors:  Maria Teresa Voso; Valeria Santini; Emiliano Fabiani; Luana Fianchi; Marianna Criscuolo; Giulia Falconi; Francesco Guidi; Stefan Hohaus; Giuseppe Leone
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 9.941

Review 2.  Predicting response to epigenetic therapy.

Authors:  Marianne B Treppendahl; Lasse S Kristensen; Kirsten Grønbæk
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2014-01-02       Impact factor: 14.808

Review 3.  DNA Hypomethylating Drugs in Cancer Therapy.

Authors:  Takahiro Sato; Jean-Pierre J Issa; Patricia Kropf
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 6.915

4.  Specific molecular signatures predict decitabine response in chronic myelomonocytic leukemia.

Authors:  Kristen Meldi; Tingting Qin; Francesca Buchi; Nathalie Droin; Jason Sotzen; Jean-Baptiste Micol; Dorothée Selimoglu-Buet; Erico Masala; Bernardino Allione; Daniela Gioia; Antonella Poloni; Monia Lunghi; Eric Solary; Omar Abdel-Wahab; Valeria Santini; Maria E Figueroa
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2015-03-30       Impact factor: 14.808

5.  TET2 Mutations Affect Non-CpG Island DNA Methylation at Enhancers and Transcription Factor-Binding Sites in Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia.

Authors:  Jumpei Yamazaki; Jaroslav Jelinek; Yue Lu; Matteo Cesaroni; Jozef Madzo; Frank Neumann; Rong He; Rodolphe Taby; Aparna Vasanthakumar; Trisha Macrae; Kelly R Ostler; Hagop M Kantarjian; Shoudan Liang; Marcos R Estecio; Lucy A Godley; Jean-Pierre J Issa
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2015-05-13       Impact factor: 12.701

6.  A phase II study of the efficacy, safety, and determinants of response to 5-azacitidine (Vidaza®) in patients with chronic myelomonocytic leukemia.

Authors:  Srinivas K Tantravahi; Philippe Szankasi; Jamshid S Khorashad; Kim-Hien Dao; Tibor Kovacsovics; Todd W Kelley; Michael W Deininger
Journal:  Leuk Lymphoma       Date:  2016-02-08

7.  A multi-centre phase 2 study of azacitidine in chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia.

Authors:  M W Drummond; C Pocock; M Boissinot; J Mills; J Brown; P Cauchy; N C P Cross; S Hartley; J Kell; A Szubert; P N Cockerill; D T Bowen
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 11.528

8.  NRASG12V oncogene facilitates self-renewal in a murine model of acute myelogenous leukemia.

Authors:  Zohar Sachs; Rebecca S LaRue; Hanh T Nguyen; Karen Sachs; Klara E Noble; Nurul Azyan Mohd Hassan; Ernesto Diaz-Flores; Susan K Rathe; Aaron L Sarver; Sean C Bendall; Ngoc A Ha; Miechaleen D Diers; Garry P Nolan; Kevin M Shannon; David A Largaespada
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 9.  Increasing recognition and emerging therapies argue for dedicated clinical trials in chronic myelomonocytic leukemia.

Authors:  Aline Renneville; Mrinal M Patnaik; Onyee Chan; Eric Padron; Eric Solary
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2021-06-26       Impact factor: 11.528

10.  Impact of molecular mutations on treatment response to DNMT inhibitors in myelodysplasia and related neoplasms.

Authors:  F Traina; V Visconte; P Elson; A Tabarroki; A M Jankowska; E Hasrouni; Y Sugimoto; H Szpurka; H Makishima; C L O'Keefe; M A Sekeres; A S Advani; M Kalaycio; E A Copelan; Y Saunthararajah; S T Olalla Saad; J P Maciejewski; R V Tiu
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 11.528

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.