Literature DB >> 21827781

Non-response bias in a web-based health behaviour survey of New Zealand tertiary students.

Kypros Kypri1, Ari Samaranayaka, Jennie Connor, John D Langley, Brett Maclennan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: There has been little investigation of non-response bias in web-based health surveys. We hypothesised that non-respondents have a higher prevalence of risk behaviours than respondents.
METHOD: In 2005, random samples of students aged 17-25 years from 12 New Zealand tertiary institutions (n=7130) were invited to complete a web-based health behaviour survey, with three e-mail reminders. Early respondents (before 2nd reminder) were compared with late respondents (after 2nd reminder). Late respondents served as a proxy for non-respondents.
RESULTS: 2607 students (37%) responded early, 676 (9%) responded late, and 3847 (54%) did not respond. There were differences between early and late respondents in high school binge drinking (38% vs 47%, p=0.002) and non-compliance with physical activity guidelines (12% vs 18%, p=0.004). Differences in overweight/obesity (26% vs 31%, p=0.058), smoking (18% vs 22%, p=0.091) and non-compliance with dietary guidelines (76% vs 77%, p=0.651) were non-significant but point estimates were in the expected direction. Estimated bias in prevalence of risk behaviours was an absolute difference of 1-4% and a relative difference of 0-21%.
CONCLUSION: Respondents whose participation was hardest to elicit reported more risk behaviour. Assuming non-respondents' behaviour is similar or more extreme than that of late respondents, prevalence will have been substantially underestimated. Copyright Â
© 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21827781     DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2011.07.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Med        ISSN: 0091-7435            Impact factor:   4.018


  24 in total

1.  Factors associated with survey response in hand surgery research.

Authors:  Arjan G J Bot; Jade A Anderson; Valentin Neuhaus; David Ring
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Vaccination during pregnancy: Canadian maternity care providers' opinions and practices.

Authors:  Eve Dubé; Dominique Gagnon; Kyla Kaminsky; Courtney R Green; Manale Ouakki; Julie A Bettinger; Nicholas Brousseau; Eliana Castillo; Natasha S Crowcroft; S Michelle Driedger; Devon Greyson; Deshayne Fell; William Fisher; Arnaud Gagneur; Maryse Guay; Donna Halperin; Scott A Halperin; Shannon MacDonald; Samantha B Meyer; Nancy M Waite; Kumanan Wilson; Holly O Witteman; Mark Yudin; Jocelynn L Cook
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  The role of community pharmacists in depression management: a survey of attitudes, practices and perceived barriers.

Authors:  Rula Shami; Mohammed Fasihul Alam; Maguy Saffouh ElHajj
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2021-10-18

4.  Personalized feedback as a universal prevention approach for college drinking: a randomized trial of an e-mail linked universal web-based alcohol intervention.

Authors:  Tibor P Palfai; Michael Winter; John Lu; David Rosenbloom; Richard Saitz
Journal:  J Prim Prev       Date:  2014-04

5.  Risk factors for mental disorder among university students in Australia: findings from a web-based cross-sectional survey.

Authors:  David Said; Kypros Kypri; Jenny Bowman
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2012-09-04       Impact factor: 4.328

6.  Second-stage non-response in the Swiss health survey: determinants and bias in outcomes.

Authors:  Thomas Volken
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2013-02-23       Impact factor: 3.295

7.  The effect of low survey response rates on estimates of alcohol consumption in a general population survey.

Authors:  Jessica Meiklejohn; Jennie Connor; Kypros Kypri
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-20       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Drinking pattern is more strongly associated with under-reporting of alcohol consumption than socio-demographic factors: evidence from a mixed-methods study.

Authors:  Sadie Boniface; James Kneale; Nicola Shelton
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2014-12-18       Impact factor: 3.295

9.  Effects of study design and allocation on self-reported alcohol consumption: randomized trial.

Authors:  Kypros Kypri; Amanda Wilson; John Attia; Paschal J Sheeran; Jim McCambridge
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2015-03-28       Impact factor: 2.279

10.  A telephone survey of factors affecting willingness to participate in health research surveys.

Authors:  D C Glass; H L Kelsall; C Slegers; A B Forbes; B Loff; D Zion; L Fritschi
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2015-10-05       Impact factor: 3.295

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.