Literature DB >> 21827720

Improved prenatal detection of chromosomal anomalies.

Christina Frøslev-Friis1, Karina Hjort-Pedersen, Carsten U Henriques, Lotte Nylandsted Krogh, Ester Garne.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Prenatal screening for karyotype anomalies takes place in most European countries. In Denmark, the screening method was changed in 2005. The aim of this study was to study the trends in prevalence and prenatal detection rates of chromosome anomalies and Down syndrome (DS) over a 22-year period.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study was based on data collected from the EUROCAT registry of congenital anomalies for Funen County. The registry includes information about live births, foetal deaths with a gestational age > 20 weeks and terminations of pregnancy after prenatal diagnosis of foetal anomaly (TOPFA). The study includes all foetuses/infants diagnosed with a chromosome anomaly born between 1986 and 2007 of a mother residing in Funen County.
RESULTS: A total of 431 foetuses/infants had a chromosome anomaly corresponding to an overall prevalence of 35.6 chromosome anomalies per 10,000 births. This figure remained constant during the study period. Two hundred and three cases were live births (47% of total), 26 foetal deaths (6%) and 202 TOPFAs (47%). The prenatal detection rate for chromosome anomalies increased from 27% in the 1980s to 71% in the new millennium (p < 0.001). There were 235 cases with DS (55% of total cases), which yields an overall prevalence of 19 DS cases per 10,000 births.
CONCLUSION: The prevalence of all chromosomal anomalies and DS did not change over time. The prenatal DS detection rate more than doubled from 1986-1989 to 2000-2007. The number of TOPFAs increased, which is consistent with a decrease in the number of live births with DS as well as in all chromosomal anomalies. FUNDING: not relevant. TRIAL REGISTRATION: not relevant.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21827720

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dan Med Bull        ISSN: 0907-8916


  3 in total

1.  Socially repugnant or the standard of care: Is there a distinction between sex-selective and ability-selective abortion?

Authors:  Rebecca Lobo; Garnett Genuis
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  Communication of support and critique in Swedish virtual community threads about prenatal diagnoses of fetal anomalies.

Authors:  Tommy Carlsson; Mats Landqvist; Elisabet Mattsson
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2016-07-29       Impact factor: 3.007

3.  Written narratives from immigrants following a prenatal diagnosis: qualitative exploratory study.

Authors:  Tommy Carlsson; Banaz Balbas; Elisabet Mattsson
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2019-05-06       Impact factor: 3.007

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.